ATL: NATE - Post Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
bella_may
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 908
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 2:13 pm
Location: SE Mississippi coast

Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1261 Postby bella_may » Fri Oct 06, 2017 1:33 pm

stormlover2013 wrote:I don't think cat 2 is even in possible with this, the no name system is making this sloppy sloppy


Have you even looked at the satellite? Cat 2 is definitely not impossible and that's enough to cause widespread power outages and damage. Especially to those of us close and just east of the center
1 likes   

User avatar
FLpanhandle91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1033
Age: 34
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 3:50 pm
Location: Fort Walton Beach, FL

Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1262 Postby FLpanhandle91 » Fri Oct 06, 2017 1:36 pm

stormlover2013 wrote:no I am looking at everything as possible, floaters, radars, and etc....the system doesn't look good, max winds at 50 mph right now, I am going to say cat 1 , max winds 80-85 mph its a sloppy system so many people won't see winds that high...


Have you experienced 80-85mph sustained winds? That causes significant damage. People like my family and I are lined up to take the east part of this storm in the Florida panhandle.
3 likes   

User avatar
galaxy401
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2419
Age: 30
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 9:04 pm
Location: Casa Grande, Arizona

Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1263 Postby galaxy401 » Fri Oct 06, 2017 1:36 pm

stormlover2013 wrote:no I am looking at everything as possible, floaters, radars, and etc....the system doesn't look good, max winds at 50 mph right now, I am going to say cat 1 , max winds 80-85 mph its a sloppy system so many people won't see winds that high...


We are clearly looking at different things here.

You have been repeating your same point over 5 times already.
Last edited by galaxy401 on Fri Oct 06, 2017 1:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
3 likes   
Got my eyes on moving right into Hurricane Alley: Florida.

BYG Jacob

Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1264 Postby BYG Jacob » Fri Oct 06, 2017 1:36 pm

stormlover2013 wrote:no I am looking at everything as possible, floaters, radars, and etc....the system doesn't look good, max winds at 50 mph right now, I am going to say cat 1 , max winds 80-85 mph its a sloppy system so many people won't see winds that high...

Meanwhile, in reality, Nate continues to reorganize his core, and is over the warmest waters in the Atlantic.
1 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1265 Postby Aric Dunn » Fri Oct 06, 2017 1:37 pm

nice long curved band trying to wrap around the center the last couple hours... if it closes off then some pretty quick deepening could occur.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

txwatcher91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1498
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:29 pm

Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1266 Postby txwatcher91 » Fri Oct 06, 2017 1:37 pm

stormlover2013 wrote:no I am looking at everything as possible, floaters, radars, and etc....the system doesn't look good, max winds at 50 mph right now, I am going to say cat 1 , max winds 80-85 mph its a sloppy system so many people won't see winds that high...


And what if this system undergoes RI and the pressure drops 30-40mb by landfall in the 960mb range with cat 2/3 winds? Satellite high res is showing rapidly improving banding and convection firing over the system, during DMIN nonetheless. Tonight this will explode and we will likely be looking at a rapidly deepening hurricane as this approaches landfall.
0 likes   

xironman
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2522
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 4:53 pm
Location: NoVA

Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1267 Postby xironman » Fri Oct 06, 2017 1:37 pm

This is the place to watch

Image
0 likes   

bob rulz
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1704
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 7:30 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1268 Postby bob rulz » Fri Oct 06, 2017 1:37 pm

Big Easy Breeze wrote:
panamatropicwatch wrote:Went ahead and put up the shutters and put away the patio furniture. These things sometimes have a bad habit of making that northeast turn a little early.


A mass moving in a given direction at the projected speed of some 20mph, will have a very difficult time making a sudden turn. The turn will be more gradual (less sharp), but timing will be critical, obviously.


A hurricane of any size and any intensity can make a hard turn. Remember Irma "bouncing" off the coast of Cuba or Maria taking a hard hard right turn off the coast of North Carolina.
0 likes   

BYG Jacob

Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1269 Postby BYG Jacob » Fri Oct 06, 2017 1:38 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:nice long curved band trying to wrap around the center the last couple hours... if it closes off then some pretty quick deepening could occur.

It probably will, Nate is over jet fuel right now.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1270 Postby Aric Dunn » Fri Oct 06, 2017 1:39 pm

bob rulz wrote:
Big Easy Breeze wrote:
panamatropicwatch wrote:Went ahead and put up the shutters and put away the patio furniture. These things sometimes have a bad habit of making that northeast turn a little early.


A mass moving in a given direction at the projected speed of some 20mph, will have a very difficult time making a sudden turn. The turn will be more gradual (less sharp), but timing will be critical, obviously.


A hurricane of any size and any intensity can make a hard turn. Remember Irma "bouncing" off the coast of Cuba or Maria taking a hard hard right turn off the coast of North Carolina.


pretty sure he meant because of its forward speed.. both IRMA ans MAria were moving slow..
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

stormlover2013

Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1271 Postby stormlover2013 » Fri Oct 06, 2017 1:40 pm

I just feel the ingredients isn't there right now to develop quickly, now lets be honest we all feel it will get to a low cat 1 so 45 mph to 75 is pretty good development I just don't see it getting to a cat 2 like some peeps are saying.
0 likes   

bob rulz
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1704
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 7:30 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1272 Postby bob rulz » Fri Oct 06, 2017 1:42 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:
bob rulz wrote:
Big Easy Breeze wrote:
A mass moving in a given direction at the projected speed of some 20mph, will have a very difficult time making a sudden turn. The turn will be more gradual (less sharp), but timing will be critical, obviously.


A hurricane of any size and any intensity can make a hard turn. Remember Irma "bouncing" off the coast of Cuba or Maria taking a hard hard right turn off the coast of North Carolina.


pretty sure he meant because of its forward speed.. both IRMA ans MAria were moving slow..


Does speed matter either? Charley was going about 20mph when it made its unexpected early turn.
Last edited by bob rulz on Fri Oct 06, 2017 1:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

LarryWx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6323
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 2:04 pm
Location: GA

Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1273 Postby LarryWx » Fri Oct 06, 2017 1:42 pm

stormlover2013 wrote:I just feel the ingredients isn't there right now to develop quickly, now lets be honest we all feel it will get to a low cat 1 so 45 mph to 75 is pretty good development I just don't see it getting to a cat 2 like some peeps are saying.


I don't know why you are sort of getting blasted here. You're just giving your opinion like anyone is allowed to do.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

bob rulz
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1704
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 7:30 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1274 Postby bob rulz » Fri Oct 06, 2017 1:43 pm

LarryWx wrote:
stormlover2013 wrote:I just feel the ingredients isn't there right now to develop quickly, now lets be honest we all feel it will get to a low cat 1 so 45 mph to 75 is pretty good development I just don't see it getting to a cat 2 like some peeps are saying.


I don't know why you are sort of getting blasted here. You're just giving your opinion like anyone is allowed to do.


Because downplaying the threat of a developing hurricane heading towards a populated area is frowned upon unless there is strong evidence to support their argument.
Last edited by bob rulz on Fri Oct 06, 2017 1:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
4 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20012
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: NATE - Models

#1275 Postby tolakram » Fri Oct 06, 2017 1:43 pm

12Z Euro and total precip graph. Since the 0Z almost lost the system in the central gulf I think it's fair to say this run is stronger throughout with a similar landfall intensity.

Image

Image
1 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
FLpanhandle91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1033
Age: 34
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 3:50 pm
Location: Fort Walton Beach, FL

Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1276 Postby FLpanhandle91 » Fri Oct 06, 2017 1:44 pm

LarryWx wrote:
stormlover2013 wrote:I just feel the ingredients isn't there right now to develop quickly, now lets be honest we all feel it will get to a low cat 1 so 45 mph to 75 is pretty good development I just don't see it getting to a cat 2 like some peeps are saying.


I don't know why you are sort of getting blasted here. You're just giving your opinion like anyone is allowed to do.


Mainly because he/she is giving no sort of evidence to back up their claims of minimal strengthening.
2 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1277 Postby Aric Dunn » Fri Oct 06, 2017 1:44 pm

bob rulz wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:
bob rulz wrote:
A hurricane of any size and any intensity can make a hard turn. Remember Irma "bouncing" off the coast of Cuba or Maria taking a hard hard right turn off the coast of North Carolina.


pretty sure he meant because of its forward speed.. both IRMA ans MAria were moving slow..


Does speed matter either? Charley was going about 20mph when it made its unexpected early turn.


yes it does.. and charley didn't make a SHARP turn..
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

BigB0882
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2284
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 12:08 am
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Contact:

Re: ATL: NATE - Models

#1278 Postby BigB0882 » Fri Oct 06, 2017 1:49 pm

That Euro run is slightly west of the NHC track. Maybe initial landfall is right on but it continues north into Louisiana instead of hooking towards MS/AL coastline.
0 likes   

txwatcher91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1498
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:29 pm

Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1279 Postby txwatcher91 » Fri Oct 06, 2017 1:49 pm

stormlover2013 wrote:I just feel the ingredients isn't there right now to develop quickly, now lets be honest we all feel it will get to a low cat 1 so 45 mph to 75 is pretty good development I just don't see it getting to a cat 2 like some peeps are saying.


People never thought Harvey would be a strong cat 4 at landfall or dump 60+ inches of rain. No one thought the islands would be devasted by two cat 5 hurricanes this year but they were. In a season where storms have undergone RI in favorable environments it's not unreasonable to see Nate do the same. A smaller system also will ramp up quicker/stronger and with 36+ hours still over water there is plenty of time for this to deepen into more than a cat 1. A low shear, high SST environment with a core that is organizing very quickly is a recipe for RI as we've seen multiple times this year.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1280 Postby Aric Dunn » Fri Oct 06, 2017 1:50 pm

if this convective pattern keep improving with that type of deep convection wrapping around next recon might find it much closer to hurricane strength..
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests