ATL: NATE - Post Tropical - Discussion
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion
dry air, little bit of shear, no name system, also this thing is booking it!! hard to developed quickly when systems are moving this fast
0 likes
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 34002
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion
It's already at the 00Z point (or slightly east of) 5 hours ahead of schedule? Wow it is zooming!
0 likes
Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion
TWC just said that FL panhandle (near Panama City or Pensacola) is possible, but still also saying that LA landfall is likely.
Either way, thankfully this isn't a very strong storm.
Either way, thankfully this isn't a very strong storm.
1 likes
Storm Track: Erin '95, Opal '95, Danny '97, Georges '98, Ivan '04, Dennis '05
Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion
bella_may wrote:NDG wrote:I can definitely say that it looks like Nate is developing a core now, convection is right along the W & S quadrant trying to feel in on the rest of the quadrants.
There's a little bit of dry air just to the east but as it reaches the gulf it won't have that problem
In my opinion, I would have to politely disagree. The jet stream is dipping down into the Rockies, sending that high level cooler air right into the top end of this storm, plus the low/ground level winds are pushing the hot dry air out of the Mexican desert, which is the dry section being sucked in from the west into the southern section of the storm. Combine that with the speed of this thing and it will not have any time to develop much. As it gets into the northern gulf the jet stream will be sucking out much of the moisture, dumping it along the front all the way into New England.
This is why they are saying Cat 1 at worst.
0 likes
- Blown Away
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 10147
- Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am
Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion
I'll predict the NHC lowers intensity forecast a little...
0 likes
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05... EYE COMING MY WAY IN 2024…
Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…
Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…
- MGC
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 5899
- Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2003 9:05 pm
- Location: Pass Christian MS, or what is left.
Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion
Nate looks to be getting better organized this afternoon......not a good trend. I think Nate's involvement with the Yucatan should be minimal.....MGC
1 likes
- galaxy401
- Category 5
- Posts: 2419
- Age: 30
- Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 9:04 pm
- Location: Casa Grande, Arizona
Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion
Some are saying this storm is strengthening while others are saying it won't strengthen much more. Huge inconsistencies today. 

6 likes
Got my eyes on moving right into Hurricane Alley: Florida.
-
- Admin
- Posts: 20012
- Age: 62
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
- Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)
Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion
GBPackMan wrote:In my opinion, I would have to politely disagree. The jet stream is dipping down into the Rockies, sending that high level cooler air right into the top end of this storm, plus the low/ground level winds are pushing the hot dry air out of the Mexican desert, which is the dry section being sucked in from the west into the southern section of the storm. Combine that with the speed of this thing and it will not have any time to develop much. As it gets into the northern gulf the jet stream will be sucking out much of the moisture, dumping it along the front all the way into New England.
This is why they are saying Cat 1 at worst.
What maps are you using that show that?
Here's the GFS 200mb https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/?model=gfs®ion=atl&pkg=uv200&runtime=2017100612&fh=0&xpos=0&ypos=300
Not seeing this cool air you are talking about as wind direction stays out of the south and southwest at the upper levels.
2 likes
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion
Blown Away wrote:I'll predict the NHC lowers intensity forecast a little...
If anything they might up the intensity a little. But I don't expect them to change the intensity until the next recon. I hope this storm doesn't catch people off guard. You never know how long the power outages could last
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 21238
- Age: 42
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
- Location: Ready for the Chase.
- Contact:
Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion
last couple frames.. some very deep hot towers developing and wrapping around to the north side.. could be a start of a deepening phase..
0 likes
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
If there is nothing before... then just ask

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 21238
- Age: 42
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
- Location: Ready for the Chase.
- Contact:
Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion
pressure has definitely dropped.. this bouy in the eastern "eyewall'' with 40kts of wind with a pressure 0f 996..so central pressure probably 993 ish maybe lower.
http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=42056
http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=42056
Last edited by Aric Dunn on Fri Oct 06, 2017 3:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
If there is nothing before... then just ask

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion
I wouldn’t be surprised if Nate’s pressure is now down to 990 mb or just above it.


0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 1498
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:29 pm
Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion
Judging by current motion it looks like the center would either clip the Yucatan or stay offshore. If that does occur it will continue to deepen as we approach DMAX. May be a rapidly organizing hurricane by morning IMO.
2 likes
Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion
Some seriously deep convection going on the N side. Will have to see whether it does something with it to close off or it just makes the system more lopsided


0 likes
- SEASON_CANCELED
- Category 3
- Posts: 887
- Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 5:17 am
- Location: 8 Bit Charlie Sheen
Re: ATL: NATE - Models
Big Easy Breeze wrote:AJC3 wrote:Gang, two things.
1. Please keep the non-model posts over in the discussion thread.
2. When you summarize what a model solution shows, be accurate. For instance, the 12Z NAM does not show a SELA landfall (it misses Pass a Loutre to the SE by about 15 miles), and the 12Z GFS does not have NOLA written all over it (it moves over Buras, heading NE toward a second landfall along the MS coast). Thanks.
Better yet; why allow a posters written perspective of what they see in a model graphic, when all there is needed, is the graphic?
tolakram has it down pat!
The Majority of us come here for commentary both professional and not...that is what puts S2k above everything else and what has made it the #1 resource on the internet during the carnot cycle of the tropics. If we wanted just graphics we would go elsewhere.
This is a forum after all..as long there isn't outrageous doom casting or talk about global warming happening i do not see what the problem is. I see neither.
4 likes
i am a big stupid ugly moron with an ugly face and a big butt and my butt stinks and i like to kiss my own butt
Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion
txwatcher91 wrote:Judging by current motion it looks like the center would either clip the Yucatan or stay offshore. If that does occur it will continue to deepen as we approach DMAX. May be a rapidly organizing hurricane by morning IMO.
Too much sheer and interaction with other pieces in the region to get much past 80mph winds at landfall.
0 likes
-
- Tropical Depression
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2017 3:55 pm
Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion
GBPackMan wrote:txwatcher91 wrote:Judging by current motion it looks like the center would either clip the Yucatan or stay offshore. If that does occur it will continue to deepen as we approach DMAX. May be a rapidly organizing hurricane by morning IMO.
Too much sheer and interaction with other pieces in the region to get much past 80mph winds at landfall.
While the official NHC forecast isn't for it to get to over 80 mph winds, the statement in their last discussion of the storm would seem to debunk your claims:
"Conditions appear favorable for strengthening up to landfall on the
northern Gulf Coast, and Nate is expected to make landfall there as
a hurricane. The new intensity forecast, which is an update of the
previous one, lies near the upper edge of the intensity guidance.
It should be noted that the Rapid Intensification Index of the SHIPS
model continues to indicate an above normal chance of rapid
intensification. However, the current structure of the cyclone does
not favor rapid development."
Note in bold. RI is possible, but NHC isn't forecasting it because of the "current" structure of the storm. Note also, there's nothing about shear or dry air inhibiting RI in this statement. Given the recent favorable changes in structure, why would we NOT expect a higher intensity forecast?
1 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 21238
- Age: 42
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
- Location: Ready for the Chase.
- Contact:
Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion
highest 1 min wind from bouy so far
44.7 kts
currently gusting to 70 mph..
take that back now
4:01 pm 48.6 kts
44.7 kts
currently gusting to 70 mph..
take that back now
4:01 pm 48.6 kts
Last edited by Aric Dunn on Fri Oct 06, 2017 3:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
If there is nothing before... then just ask

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 34002
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion
Aric Dunn wrote:highest 1 min wind from bouy so far
44.7 kts
currently gusting to 70 mph..
I'd go with 50 kt based on that data.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 21238
- Age: 42
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
- Location: Ready for the Chase.
- Contact:
Re: ATL: NATE - Tropical Storm - Discussion
CrazyC83 wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:highest 1 min wind from bouy so far
44.7 kts
currently gusting to 70 mph..
I'd go with 50 kt based on that data.
now the 1 min avg is
4:01 pm 48.6 kts
50 kts seems reasonable.
0 likes
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
If there is nothing before... then just ask

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests