emeraldislenc wrote:The 5 pm advisory will be interesting
Go to the Advisories thread.
viewtopic.php?f=59&t=118367&p=2546993#p2546993
Moderator: S2k Moderators
emeraldislenc wrote:The 5 pm advisory will be interesting
Alyono wrote:cycloneye wrote:Peak intensity is up to 90kts at 5 PM.
72H 02/1800Z 15.7N 75.1W 90 KT 105 MPH
96H 03/1800Z 18.6N 75.5W 90 KT 105 MPH
laughably too low.
You're telling me that over waters with heat content higher than the Philippine Sea with less than 10 kts of shear, this is not going to rapidly intensify?
Only way that happens is if the shear forecasts are wrong. That is possible as they have already been wrong once. But if the shear decreases as NHC says, this will explode
jlauderdal wrote:Alyono wrote:cycloneye wrote:Peak intensity is up to 90kts at 5 PM.
72H 02/1800Z 15.7N 75.1W 90 KT 105 MPH
96H 03/1800Z 18.6N 75.5W 90 KT 105 MPH
laughably too low.
You're telling me that over waters with heat content higher than the Philippine Sea with less than 10 kts of shear, this is not going to rapidly intensify?
Only way that happens is if the shear forecasts are wrong. That is possible as they have already been wrong once. But if the shear decreases as NHC says, this will explode
You predicting RI?
Dean4Storms wrote:This is way ahead of the forecast points to this point, Mathew better slow down soon or it is going to be much further west before that ridge begins to erode.
Ken711 wrote:Dean4Storms wrote:This is way ahead of the forecast points to this point, Mathew better slow down soon or it is going to be much further west before that ridge begins to erode.
What would the longer track implications be?
the the easy part is through sunday/monday so no reason for them to deviate too much..intensity forecast as always is much more difficult even through 5 dayspsyclone wrote:Say what you will about the models lurching around...one thing that isn't lurching around so much is the NHC's official track. It has consistently implied a substantial threat to Jamaica, Eastern Cuba, Haiti and the Bahamas. It reminds me very much of Hermine which also was fairly consistent despite all the noise. It would also seem to continue to imply a very low risk to Florida at this point in time.
Ken711 wrote:Dean4Storms wrote:This is way ahead of the forecast points to this point, Mathew better slow down soon or it is going to be much further west before that ridge begins to erode.
What would the longer track implications be?
psyclone wrote:Say what you will about the models lurching around...one thing that isn't lurching around so much is the NHC's official track. It has consistently implied a substantial threat to Jamaica, Eastern Cuba, Haiti and the Bahamas. It reminds me very much of Hermine which also was fairly consistent despite all the noise. It would also seem to continue to imply a very low risk to Florida at this point in time.
Dean4Storms wrote:Ken711 wrote:Dean4Storms wrote:This is way ahead of the forecast points to this point, Mathew better slow down soon or it is going to be much further west before that ridge begins to erode.
What would the longer track implications be?
The turn would occur further west which begins to put FL into play on its northward track. Remember to this point models have been forecasting the ridge to its north without Recon Flight Obs being fed into them extending only to about where their current solutions turn it north. If Mathew continues past that general consensus of the turn it would mean the Ridge extends further Westward than the models calculated, a possibility!
Raebie wrote:Ken711 wrote:Dean4Storms wrote:This is way ahead of the forecast points to this point, Mathew better slow down soon or it is going to be much further west before that ridge begins to erode.
What would the longer track implications be?
My guess would be Florida would possibly be in play and a definite threat to the EC.
Bailey1777 wrote:Question, Matthew is moving at 17 mph and is supposed to keep west or just south of west for the next 48 hours..that would put it 817 miles west of where it is now, can somebody with the tools show where this would be on the map please.
Bailey1777 wrote:Question, Matthew is moving at 17 mph and is supposed to keep west or just south of west for the next 48 hours..that would put it 817 miles west of where it is now, can somebody with the tools show where this would be on the map please.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests