ATL: INGRID - Remnants - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

#141 Postby Alyono » Wed Sep 11, 2013 7:59 am

BT has this moving at 270... will need to turn to the north some to move over the BOC
0 likes   

djmikey
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 153
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 6:04 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#142 Postby djmikey » Wed Sep 11, 2013 8:00 am

I think Tx was jinxed. So much for the perfect scenario of a rain maker easing our extreme drought across Texas. I really feel this is our last oppurtunity of something tropical easing drought situations across Texas. :cry:


The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion - 40% - 70%

#143 Postby wxman57 » Wed Sep 11, 2013 8:00 am

cycloneye wrote:
wxman57 wrote:I think 70% is about 30% too low. And if it stays over the BoC/SW Gulf as long as GFS is indicating not only will it almost certainly be a hurricane, but possibly a major hurricane.


You go that far about being a major?


If it becomes a TS and has 2-3 days over water, then there may not be much to prevent continued strengthening. Now that wouldn't be what I would put out as a FORECAST to our clients, but it's a possibility.
0 likes   

caneman

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#144 Postby caneman » Wed Sep 11, 2013 8:17 am

This has always been a likely Mexico storm, GFS not withstanding[/quote]

Thanks Alyono. Glad a Met said it. Little too much hype going on here. Looks like the models burying it in Mexico thus far look to be right looking at Satellite this morning.[/quote]

what hype? I think last nights model runs were a fun time on the board. Its not all informational at 1am in the morning.... :wink:[/quote]

I can see a few Texans were having some fun last night :) Back to reality now ;)
0 likes   

User avatar
tailgater
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3339
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 9:13 pm
Location: St. Amant La.

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion - 40% - 70%

#145 Postby tailgater » Wed Sep 11, 2013 8:39 am

I know that it will likely be drawing in moisture from the GOM, NW Carb. and E Pac, but dry air could be a bit of an issue IMHO.
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion - 40% - 70%

#146 Postby Sanibel » Wed Sep 11, 2013 8:55 am

That center burst started last night at 1:30am. It has a bit more of a head start than Fernand so theoretically it should top out higher if it tracks similarly.
0 likes   

User avatar
TexWx
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 370
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 11:00 pm
Location: Pearland, Texas
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion - 40% - 70%

#147 Postby TexWx » Wed Sep 11, 2013 9:02 am

This may not even make it to the BOC.
0 likes   

User avatar
Tireman4
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5853
Age: 59
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 1:08 pm
Location: Humble, Texas
Contact:

#148 Postby Tireman4 » Wed Sep 11, 2013 9:04 am

Is this all not just speculation at this time? I mean ( and I have no idea about anything) should the models need a definite center of circulation from which to work from? Would not that be from a Hurricane Hunter aircraft or letting it better organized? Goodness knows I would not want this, but the rain for Central Texas would be nice. Just my four cents.


The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ptarmigan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5313
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:06 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion - 40% - 70%

#149 Postby Ptarmigan » Wed Sep 11, 2013 9:09 am

wxman57 wrote:I think 70% is about 30% too low. And if it stays over the BoC/SW Gulf as long as GFS is indicating not only will it almost certainly be a hurricane, but possibly a major hurricane.


If it becomes a major hurricane, that could be a problem.
0 likes   

User avatar
Tireman4
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5853
Age: 59
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 1:08 pm
Location: Humble, Texas
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion - 40% - 70%

#150 Postby Tireman4 » Wed Sep 11, 2013 9:15 am

wxman57 wrote:
cycloneye wrote:
wxman57 wrote:I think 70% is about 30% too low. And if it stays over the BoC/SW Gulf as long as GFS is indicating not only will it almost certainly be a hurricane, but possibly a major hurricane.


You go that far about being a major?


If it becomes a TS and has 2-3 days over water, then there may not be much to prevent continued strengthening. Now that wouldn't be what I would put out as a FORECAST to our clients, but it's a possibility.



Wxman 57, I respect your opinion a ton. Here is one time, I sure hope that the GFS is wrong
0 likes   

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

#151 Postby ConvergenceZone » Wed Sep 11, 2013 9:31 am

very depressed that Texas may miss out on this rain :cry:
I agree that the Mexico odds seem to be increasing by the hour, especially since it's not gaining altitude. While I think most of us knew it would go to Mexico, we were hoping that it would go more to Northern Mexico so that Texas would benefit from the rains, but now it seems like southern Mexico is looking more likely...
0 likes   

User avatar
Portastorm
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 9914
Age: 63
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:16 am
Location: Round Rock, TX
Contact:

Re:

#152 Postby Portastorm » Wed Sep 11, 2013 9:52 am

ConvergenceZone wrote:very depressed that Texas may miss out on this rain :cry:
I agree that the Mexico odds seem to be increasing by the hour, especially since it's not gaining altitude. While I think most of us knew it would go to Mexico, we were hoping that it would go more to Northern Mexico so that Texas would benefit from the rains, but now it seems like southern Mexico is looking more likely...


That has been our luck since the drought began years ago. Dare I say we're used to it?! :cry:

The current movement and latest models certainly don't leave a lot of room for hope. Another 24 hours of this and we can pretty much forget about it. But as Alyono has pointed out, this has the potential to provide some devastating rains to an area of Mexico which has already seen a lot of rain this summer.
0 likes   
Any forecasts under my name are to be taken with a grain of salt. Get your best forecasts from the National Weather Service and National Hurricane Center.

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re:

#153 Postby wxman57 » Wed Sep 11, 2013 10:10 am

Tireman4 wrote:Is this all not just speculation at this time? I mean ( and I have no idea about anything) should the models need a definite center of circulation from which to work from? Would not that be from a Hurricane Hunter aircraft or letting it better organized? Goodness knows I would not want this, but the rain for Central Texas would be nice. Just my four cents.


In this case, it's not necessary for a center to form before the models get a good handle on movement. What will determine where this storm will go is dependent on the projected ridge placement to its north over TX/LA. If that ridge breaks down and/or slips east, then TX could be impacted - regardless of where or when the storm develops. Steering currents at all levels would be from east to west, so even the BAM models should handle this storm well.

Unfortunately (as far as any TX rain), both the Euro and GFS indicate that the ridge over Texas will hold strong through the middle of next week. They're in good agreement on that. And if that's the case, we won't get much rain out of the storm in TX, certainly not on the mid to upper coast.
0 likes   

HurriGuy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 734
Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2013 8:43 pm
Location: Prairieville, LA

#154 Postby HurriGuy » Wed Sep 11, 2013 10:28 am

is it just the way the convection is building up or is this thing scraping along the coast of the Yucatan right now?
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Portastorm
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 9914
Age: 63
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:16 am
Location: Round Rock, TX
Contact:

Re:

#155 Postby Portastorm » Wed Sep 11, 2013 10:36 am

HurriGuy wrote:is it just the way the convection is building up or is this thing scraping along the coast of the Yucatan right now?


To this untrained eye, I see a general west-northwest movement per visible here:

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/floaters/93L/flash-vis-short.html
0 likes   
Any forecasts under my name are to be taken with a grain of salt. Get your best forecasts from the National Weather Service and National Hurricane Center.

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: Re:

#156 Postby wxman57 » Wed Sep 11, 2013 10:40 am

Portastorm wrote:
HurriGuy wrote:is it just the way the convection is building up or is this thing scraping along the coast of the Yucatan right now?


To this untrained eye, I see a general west-northwest movement per visible here:

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/floaters/93L/flash-vis-short.html


Hard to tell. I don't think the ridge over Texas will be so strong as to not let it gain any latitude over the next day or two, allowing it to emerge into the BoC tomorrow. Not looking good for significant rain here in TX.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5849
Age: 41
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

#157 Postby Hammy » Wed Sep 11, 2013 10:44 am

Not the use the most cliche line now, but this would probably be a depression (if not storm) at this point if not for land.
0 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145285
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion - 40% - 70%

#158 Postby cycloneye » Wed Sep 11, 2013 10:49 am

Hi Portastorm. Here are the past 24 hour positions of the best track and it has rided thru the 18N latitude. If it continues moving west at 270 degress it would never reach water. That is why is important to see how the next 12 hours of movement will be to see if it gets into the water or stays overland.


AL, 93, 2013091012, , BEST, 0, 180N, 857W, 20, 1009, DB, 0, , 0, 0, 0, 0, 1010, 100, 50, 0, 0, L, 0, , 0, 0, INVEST, S,
AL, 93, 2013091018, , BEST, 0, 180N, 864W, 20, 1009, DB, 0, , 0, 0, 0, 0, 1010, 100, 50, 0, 0, L, 0, , 0, 0, INVEST, S,
AL, 93, 2013091100, , BEST, 0, 180N, 871W, 20, 1008, DB, 0, , 0, 0, 0, 0, 1010, 100, 50, 0, 0, L, 0, , 0, 0, INVEST, S,
AL, 93, 2013091106, , BEST, 0, 180N, 880W, 25, 1009, DB, 0, , 0, 0, 0, 0, 1011, 180, 120, 0, 0, L, 0, , 0, 0, INVEST, S,
AL, 93, 2013091112, , BEST, 0, 180N, 888W, 25, 1008, DB, 34,
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
Ptarmigan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5313
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:06 pm

Re: Re:

#159 Postby Ptarmigan » Wed Sep 11, 2013 10:57 am

wxman57 wrote:
Hard to tell. I don't think the ridge over Texas will be so strong as to not let it gain any latitude over the next day or two, allowing it to emerge into the BoC tomorrow. Not looking good for significant rain here in TX.


Now, if there is a way to get rid of that annoying ridge. :grrr: :grr:
0 likes   

User avatar
TexWx
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 370
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 11:00 pm
Location: Pearland, Texas
Contact:

ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#160 Postby TexWx » Wed Sep 11, 2013 11:10 am

Alyono wrote:12Z GFS buries this as a weak TS in the Bay of Campeche


I'd definitely have to agree with this run.
0 likes   


Return to “2013”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests