kevin wrote:Beryl is VIS/SWIR right now, textbookSeptemberJuly cat 5 Caribbean cruiser.
https://i.imgur.com/jdp21bE.png
Super Typhoon Beryl

Moderator: S2k Moderators
kevin wrote:Beryl is VIS/SWIR right now, textbookSeptemberJuly cat 5 Caribbean cruiser.
https://i.imgur.com/jdp21bE.png
Hayabusa wrote:kevin wrote:Beryl is VIS/SWIR right now, textbookSeptemberJuly cat 5 Caribbean cruiser.
https://i.imgur.com/jdp21bE.png
Super Typhoon Beryl
NXStumpy_Robothing wrote:Okay, I know that some people (including me) were joking about this hitting MPI and being like Dorian near peak... I just wasn't expecting it to actually make a serious run at 150kt+. Had to close down and then re-open the page on like 2 different sites to make sure I didn't just hallucinate that recon data.
What an absolutely ridiculous system.
Charleswachal wrote:Winds as high as 196 knts found on that last dropsonde. At the surface it was 167 knots.
Based on this I think we can see them go 160 to 165 knts
zzzh wrote:Charleswachal wrote:Winds as high as 196 knts found on that last dropsonde. At the surface it was 167 knots.
Based on this I think we can see them go 160 to 165 knts
1. 167kt was at 940mb, not surface.
2. These are instantaneous winds, not 1min sustained winds.
zzzh wrote:Charleswachal wrote:Winds as high as 196 knts found on that last dropsonde. At the surface it was 167 knots.
Based on this I think we can see them go 160 to 165 knts
1. 167kt was at 940mb, not surface.
2. These are instantaneous winds, not 1min sustained winds.
Keldeo1997 wrote:https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/697996354537914448/1257640057439916092/Screenshot_197.png?ex=66852413&is=6683d293&hm=6411789918d028409e6fe8c8a41f5e3a6e6a581f67c86e4a972f724a9f3fde48&
You can add this sonde to the hall of fame. Almost 200kts just above the surface
Ian2401 wrote:zzzh wrote:Charleswachal wrote:Winds as high as 196 knts found on that last dropsonde. At the surface it was 167 knots.
Based on this I think we can see them go 160 to 165 knts
1. 167kt was at 940mb, not surface.
2. These are instantaneous winds, not 1min sustained winds.
940mb is likely the sfc pressure
Ian2401 wrote:Ian2401 wrote:zzzh wrote:1. 167kt was at 940mb, not surface.
2. These are instantaneous winds, not 1min sustained winds.
940mb is likely the sfc pressure
stand corrected. looks like it wasn't reported as being a surface ob. still likely just above the sfc
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests