ATL: BARRY - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Blinhart
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2079
Age: 48
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 3:13 pm
Location: Crowley, La.

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#181 Postby Blinhart » Tue Jul 09, 2019 8:15 am

N2FSU wrote:0z Euro shifted East about 100nm

http://i66.tinypic.com/15340ae.jpg


And if it goes 15 to 20 nm west of there it will go right over me.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20009
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#182 Postby tolakram » Tue Jul 09, 2019 8:16 am

As others have pointed out, the GFS tends to accel in this area and this time in the season. This will be very interesting to watch.
2 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
WAcyclone
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 352
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2017 1:56 pm
Location: Perth, Western Australia

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#183 Postby WAcyclone » Tue Jul 09, 2019 8:22 am

The experimental HAFS (Hurricane Analysis and Forecast System) model keeps 92L relatively weak, similar to the GFS:

 https://twitter.com/AndyHazelton/status/1148570160359280649




Image
1 likes   

User avatar
ColdMiser123
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 904
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:26 pm
Location: Northeast US

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#184 Postby ColdMiser123 » Tue Jul 09, 2019 9:09 am

The 12z NAM 850 hPa vorticity max is west-southwest of the 6z run, looks slightly better aligned with the 700 hPa vorticity max so far.
0 likes   
B.S., M.S., Meteorology & Atmospheric Science

User avatar
Sambucol
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 223
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:09 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#185 Postby Sambucol » Tue Jul 09, 2019 9:23 am

ColdMiser123 wrote:The 12z NAM 850 hPa vorticity max is west-southwest of the 6z run, looks slightly better aligned with the 700 hPa vorticity max so far.

Does that move the track back to a westerly track toward Texas?
0 likes   

User avatar
ColdMiser123
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 904
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:26 pm
Location: Northeast US

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#186 Postby ColdMiser123 » Tue Jul 09, 2019 9:27 am

Still very close to the coast this run, so that will limit how strong it gets.
0 likes   
B.S., M.S., Meteorology & Atmospheric Science

User avatar
HurricaneBrain
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 520
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 2:07 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#187 Postby HurricaneBrain » Tue Jul 09, 2019 9:32 am

Gut feeling that the 12z GFS run swings back to the stronger intensity it showed in the 0z.
0 likes   

User avatar
ColdMiser123
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 904
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:26 pm
Location: Northeast US

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#188 Postby ColdMiser123 » Tue Jul 09, 2019 9:33 am

HurricaneBrain wrote:Gut feeling that the 12z GFS run swings back to the stronger intensity it showed in the 0z.


If the NAM was 50 miles further south, it would have been a significantly stronger solution with better vertical alignment.
0 likes   
B.S., M.S., Meteorology & Atmospheric Science

User avatar
ColdMiser123
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 904
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:26 pm
Location: Northeast US

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#189 Postby ColdMiser123 » Tue Jul 09, 2019 9:33 am

3km continues to be south of the 12 km with surface low placement. Pretty remarkable how different the evolution is actually compared to the 12km.
0 likes   
B.S., M.S., Meteorology & Atmospheric Science

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9621
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#190 Postby Steve » Tue Jul 09, 2019 9:53 am

ColdMiser123 wrote:3km continues to be south of the 12 km with surface low placement. Pretty remarkable how different the evolution is actually compared to the 12km.


Yeah. 12 just spins along the coast and eventually drops the circulation down toward South Texas, whereas the 3km, now run all the way to 84 hours, has an intensifying system just south of the LA Coast at 989mb and likely dropping at 56 hours.

. https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 0912&fh=20
Last edited by Steve on Tue Jul 09, 2019 9:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes   

BobHarlem
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2106
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:11 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#191 Postby BobHarlem » Tue Jul 09, 2019 9:54 am

1 likes   

Frank P
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2776
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 10:52 am
Location: Biloxi Beach, Ms
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#192 Postby Frank P » Tue Jul 09, 2019 9:56 am

Steve wrote:
ColdMiser123 wrote:3km continues to be south of the 12 km with surface low placement. Pretty remarkable how different the evolution is actually compared to the 12km.


Yeah. 12 just spins along the coast and eventually drops the circulation down toward South Texas, whereas the 3km, now run all the way to 84 hours, has an intensifying system just south of the LA Coast at 989mb and likely dropping at 56 hours.

. https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 0912&fh=20

That 3k NAM run could increase the pucker pressure along the coast of LA if it were to come to fruition. Just sitting of the coast far enough from land doing loops and strengthening
1 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9621
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#193 Postby Steve » Tue Jul 09, 2019 10:00 am

NAM 3km is finally finished running out to 60 hours (so 7pm Thursday Central Daylight Time). Barry is rapidly deepening and at 981 by the end of the run and dropping. Crazy. Though I'm not a fan of it in the tropics as most others aren't either, sometimes it gets clued in on stuff. Even though 20N is out of its range, it did get Harvey's pressure plunge ahead of some of the big dog models.
2 likes   

User avatar
ColdMiser123
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 904
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:26 pm
Location: Northeast US

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#194 Postby ColdMiser123 » Tue Jul 09, 2019 10:05 am

Steve wrote:
ColdMiser123 wrote:3km continues to be south of the 12 km with surface low placement. Pretty remarkable how different the evolution is actually compared to the 12km.


Yeah. 12 just spins along the coast and eventually drops the circulation down toward South Texas, whereas the 3km, now run all the way to 84 hours, has an intensifying system just south of the LA Coast at 989mb and likely dropping at 56 hours.

. https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 0912&fh=20


That is one of the largest discrepancies I can remember between the 3km and the 12km with both placement and intensity of a tropical system.

The 3km also shifted quite a bit southwest compared to the 6z run.
3 likes   
B.S., M.S., Meteorology & Atmospheric Science

User avatar
PTrackerLA
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5277
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 8:40 pm
Location: Lafayette, LA

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#195 Postby PTrackerLA » Tue Jul 09, 2019 10:09 am

Steve wrote:NAM 3km is finally finished running out to 60 hours (so 7pm Thursday Central Daylight Time). Barry is rapidly deepening and at 981 by the end of the run and dropping. Crazy. Though I'm not a fan of it in the tropics as most others aren't either, sometimes it gets clued in on stuff. Even though 20N is out of its range, it did get Harvey's pressure plunge ahead of some of the big dog models.


That's a very concerning run from the 12z 3km NAM. I remember quite well how it accurately forecast the rapid deepening of Harvey before other models latched on.

Image
Last edited by PTrackerLA on Tue Jul 09, 2019 10:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
2 likes   

User avatar
MississippiWx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1699
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Hattiesburg, Mississippi

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#196 Postby MississippiWx » Tue Jul 09, 2019 10:09 am

Steve wrote:NAM 3km is finally finished running out to 60 hours (so 7pm Thursday Central Daylight Time). Barry is rapidly deepening and at 981 by the end of the run and dropping. Crazy. Though I'm not a fan of it in the tropics as most others aren't either, sometimes it gets clued in on stuff. Even though 20N is out of its range, it did get Harvey's pressure plunge ahead of some of the big dog models.


Actually down to 979mb. It's odd that the model solutions are so different. The ones that develop the system strengthen it rather quickly. Then you have the other camp that barely even develops it into a tropical depression. It appears that the difference is in the alignment of the mid-level and low-level circulations. It's difficult to say which group is correct at this point.
2 likes   
This post is not an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of MississippiWx and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
ColdMiser123
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 904
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:26 pm
Location: Northeast US

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#197 Postby ColdMiser123 » Tue Jul 09, 2019 10:15 am

MississippiWx wrote:
Steve wrote:NAM 3km is finally finished running out to 60 hours (so 7pm Thursday Central Daylight Time). Barry is rapidly deepening and at 981 by the end of the run and dropping. Crazy. Though I'm not a fan of it in the tropics as most others aren't either, sometimes it gets clued in on stuff. Even though 20N is out of its range, it did get Harvey's pressure plunge ahead of some of the big dog models.


Actually down to 979mb. It's odd that the model solutions are so different. The ones that develop the system strengthen it rather quickly. Then you have the other camp that barely even develops it into a tropical depression. It appears that the difference is in the alignment of the mid-level and low-level circulations. It's difficult to say which group is correct at this point.


I would lean more toward the Euro solution at this point, since the GFS is doing a poor job depicting the current thunderstorm activity over the NE Gulf.

 https://twitter.com/yconsor/status/1148593202980687872


0 likes   
B.S., M.S., Meteorology & Atmospheric Science

User avatar
MississippiWx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1699
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Hattiesburg, Mississippi

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#198 Postby MississippiWx » Tue Jul 09, 2019 10:23 am

12z ICON still strengthens 92L quickly off the Louisiana coast. Down to 976mb at 90 hours and still strengthening. It's about 50 miles to the east of the 6z run so far.
1 likes   
This post is not an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of MississippiWx and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
ColdMiser123
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 904
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:26 pm
Location: Northeast US

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#199 Postby ColdMiser123 » Tue Jul 09, 2019 10:30 am

MississippiWx wrote:12z ICON still strengthens 92L quickly off the Louisiana coast. Down to 976mb at 90 hours and still strengthening. It's about 50 miles to the east of the 6z run so far.


Something worth noting too is that while it is further east, it is actually slower than the 6z run. 0z/6z were already starting to make landfall at this point.

12z RGEM is well south of the 12 km NAM, and south of the 6z run. It's pretty close to the 3km in terms of placement.
0 likes   
B.S., M.S., Meteorology & Atmospheric Science

User avatar
tarheelprogrammer
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1793
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:25 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC area (Garner, NC)

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#200 Postby tarheelprogrammer » Tue Jul 09, 2019 10:35 am

12z GFS is not showing any vorticity making it into the GOM until tomorrow at 06z. Ummmmmmmmm, am I see things incorrectly :double:
0 likes   
My posts are not official forecasts. They are just my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.


Return to “2019”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests