INVEST 99L near Leewards,comments,sat pics,etc #4

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#181 Postby wxman57 » Mon Jul 31, 2006 4:53 pm

Extremeweatherguy wrote: I agree wxman. It will be a difficult track for sure. The thing that scares me though is that if it can reach the Gulf, this thing might explode over the loop current like Katrina, Rita, Wilma, or Alberto did.


Conditions in the Gulf are nowhere near as favorable as with Katrina/Rita. Lots of shear. That's one plus.
0 likes   

User avatar
drezee
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3664
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 12:49 pm
Location: FL

#182 Postby drezee » Mon Jul 31, 2006 4:54 pm

wxman57 wrote:
The disturbance is located in the southeast quadrant of an upper-level low, a region that tends to cause a flare-up of thunderstorms, as we've seen today.



I agree with the logic that when a syste in the SE quad that is good...but this system is in the SW quad of the upper low to the N and has an upper high to the W of it. That is why the clouds are blowing NW to SE...

If it were indeed in the SE quad the clouds would move SW to NE or thereabouts...
0 likes   

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15446
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

#183 Postby NDG » Mon Jul 31, 2006 4:58 pm

AJC3 wrote:
wxman57 wrote:Y'all can continue your argument, I'll just post a few observations.

It does appear that 99L has a weak LLC located west of the convection. Winds on the west and southwest side appeat to be 15 kts or less. About 20-25 kts east of the center.

Movement appears to be to the WNW at about 15 kts.

The disturbance is located in the southeast quadrant of an upper-level low, a region that tends to cause a flare-up of thunderstorms, as we've seen today.

Once the disturbance moves a bit more to the west-northwest, the enhanced lifting caused by the upper low will diminish. The big question is whether or not the upper low was able to jump-start the disturbance enough to keep the storms going after the enhanced lifting diminishes. That remains to be seen.

If not, then we'll have a weak swirl of clouds out there for a day or two until it encounters the 2nd upper low over the SE Bahamas. Once there, storms should flare up again.

If the convection maintains itself after passing the axis of the upper level trof tonight, then shear will briefly drop and a TD could form. It would move WNW and eventually interact with the stronger upper low over the SE Bahamas. Wind shear there is fairly strong. Could rip it apart.

Making it to the southeas or south-central Gulf as a TD/TS will be a difficult trek.

End of observations. Carry on with the arguments. ;-)


Chris, one minor point to pick. The TUTT low is actually pinching off due N of the system, hence the NNW shear - I think there's pretty strong divergence aloft nonetheless. As I mentioned in another post, I think this will allow it to sneak past and ahead of the TUTT low begins before it begins to retrograde WWD.

I'll go out on a limb and say this will have no trouble maintaining at lest some convection, although it will remain in a pretty parched air mass for the next 24 hours or so. From then on, I think it will intensify.


I agree with you AJC, the TUTT low is currently due N of 99L and it will get ahead of it before both TUTT lows start retrogating westward, so 99L could very well ride between the two of them.
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#184 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Mon Jul 31, 2006 4:59 pm

NDG wrote:
AJC3 wrote:
wxman57 wrote:Y'all can continue your argument, I'll just post a few observations.

It does appear that 99L has a weak LLC located west of the convection. Winds on the west and southwest side appeat to be 15 kts or less. About 20-25 kts east of the center.

Movement appears to be to the WNW at about 15 kts.

The disturbance is located in the southeast quadrant of an upper-level low, a region that tends to cause a flare-up of thunderstorms, as we've seen today.

Once the disturbance moves a bit more to the west-northwest, the enhanced lifting caused by the upper low will diminish. The big question is whether or not the upper low was able to jump-start the disturbance enough to keep the storms going after the enhanced lifting diminishes. That remains to be seen.

If not, then we'll have a weak swirl of clouds out there for a day or two until it encounters the 2nd upper low over the SE Bahamas. Once there, storms should flare up again.

If the convection maintains itself after passing the axis of the upper level trof tonight, then shear will briefly drop and a TD could form. It would move WNW and eventually interact with the stronger upper low over the SE Bahamas. Wind shear there is fairly strong. Could rip it apart.

Making it to the southeas or south-central Gulf as a TD/TS will be a difficult trek.

End of observations. Carry on with the arguments. ;-)


Chris, one minor point to pick. The TUTT low is actually pinching off due N of the system, hence the NNW shear - I think there's pretty strong divergence aloft nonetheless. As I mentioned in another post, I think this will allow it to sneak past and ahead of the TUTT low begins before it begins to retrograde WWD.

I'll go out on a limb and say this will have no trouble maintaining at lest some convection, although it will remain in a pretty parched air mass for the next 24 hours or so. From then on, I think it will intensify.


I agree with you AJC, the TUTT low is currently due N of 99L and it will get ahead of it before both TUTT lows start retrogating westward, so 99L could very well ride between the two of them.
So, AJC3, you think this is going to intensify beyond 24 hours? How strong do you think this has the potential to become?
0 likes   

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4822
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

#185 Postby ronjon » Mon Jul 31, 2006 5:00 pm

18Z Model Runs - ignore the CLP5 (that's climatology) - looks like most models take it just north of the islands toward S FL or the straits. Of course, once its a depression, it will be initialized by all the models and we'll see what the globals do with it also. I noticed GFDL doesn't develop it into a cyclone during its last 2 runs.

http://euler.atmos.colostate.edu/~vigh/ ... early1.png
0 likes   

HurricaneHunter914
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4439
Age: 31
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:36 pm
Location: College Station, TX

#186 Postby HurricaneHunter914 » Mon Jul 31, 2006 5:01 pm

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/avn.jpg

99L has an "eye" like feature with it, but its probably the dry are getting sicked into the system.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#187 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Mon Jul 31, 2006 5:02 pm

ronjon wrote:18Z Model Runs - ignore the CLP5 (that's climatology) - looks like most models take it just north of the islands toward S FL or the straits. Of course, once its a depression, it will be initialized by all the models and we'll see what the globals do with it also. I noticed GFDL doesn't develop it into a cyclone during its last 2 runs.

http://euler.atmos.colostate.edu/~vigh/ ... early1.png
I don't like the look of these... :roll:

They pretty much all have the system avoiding the highest mountains and roughest terrain.
0 likes   

Weatherfreak000

#188 Postby Weatherfreak000 » Mon Jul 31, 2006 5:04 pm

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/loop-vis.html


Convection IS over the center. Am I wrong?
Last edited by Weatherfreak000 on Mon Jul 31, 2006 5:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Thunder44
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5922
Age: 44
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 7:53 pm
Location: New York City

#189 Postby Thunder44 » Mon Jul 31, 2006 5:04 pm

HurricaneHunter914 wrote:http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/avn.jpg

99L has an "eye" like feature with it, but its probably the dry are getting sicked into the system.


That's not where the center is. It's further north.
0 likes   

User avatar
southerngale
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 27418
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)

#190 Postby southerngale » Mon Jul 31, 2006 5:05 pm

HurricaneHunter914 wrote:http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/avn.jpg

99L has an "eye" like feature with it, but its probably the dry are getting sicked into the system.


Where? It looks like butt cheeks. lol
0 likes   

User avatar
AJC3
Admin
Admin
Posts: 3999
Age: 61
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: Ballston Spa, New York
Contact:

#191 Postby AJC3 » Mon Jul 31, 2006 5:05 pm

Extremeweatherguy wrote:
NDG wrote:
AJC3 wrote:
wxman57 wrote:Y'all can continue your argument, I'll just post a few observations.

It does appear that 99L has a weak LLC located west of the convection. Winds on the west and southwest side appeat to be 15 kts or less. About 20-25 kts east of the center.

Movement appears to be to the WNW at about 15 kts.

The disturbance is located in the southeast quadrant of an upper-level low, a region that tends to cause a flare-up of thunderstorms, as we've seen today.

Once the disturbance moves a bit more to the west-northwest, the enhanced lifting caused by the upper low will diminish. The big question is whether or not the upper low was able to jump-start the disturbance enough to keep the storms going after the enhanced lifting diminishes. That remains to be seen.

If not, then we'll have a weak swirl of clouds out there for a day or two until it encounters the 2nd upper low over the SE Bahamas. Once there, storms should flare up again.

If the convection maintains itself after passing the axis of the upper level trof tonight, then shear will briefly drop and a TD could form. It would move WNW and eventually interact with the stronger upper low over the SE Bahamas. Wind shear there is fairly strong. Could rip it apart.

Making it to the southeas or south-central Gulf as a TD/TS will be a difficult trek.

End of observations. Carry on with the arguments. ;-)


Chris, one minor point to pick. The TUTT low is actually pinching off due N of the system, hence the NNW shear - I think there's pretty strong divergence aloft nonetheless. As I mentioned in another post, I think this will allow it to sneak past and ahead of the TUTT low begins before it begins to retrograde WWD.

I'll go out on a limb and say this will have no trouble maintaining at lest some convection, although it will remain in a pretty parched air mass for the next 24 hours or so. From then on, I think it will intensify.


I agree with you AJC, the TUTT low is currently due N of 99L and it will get ahead of it before both TUTT lows start retrogating westward, so 99L could very well ride between the two of them.
So, AJC3, you think this is going to intensify beyond 24 hours? How strong do you think this has the potential to become?



Well, I don't see overall environmental conditions as becoming that great. While the air mass well ahead of the system beyond 24 hours won't be as dryas it is now, it's not going to become terribly moist either.

Similarly, while I think shear will decrease, I still think there will be some northerly shear for another day or so.

A lot of if's here. I certainly don't see rapid strenghtening, assuming any occurs at all. Once it does become a TC, I'd probably call for slow strenghtening... no more than 5 knots/12 hours. I really don't want to get any more specific than that, especially being at home and not having all the guidance here in front of me.


edit: Also, something to consider is any potential interaction with the islands of the GA, especially Hispanola.
Last edited by AJC3 on Mon Jul 31, 2006 5:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

HurricaneHunter914
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4439
Age: 31
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:36 pm
Location: College Station, TX

#192 Postby HurricaneHunter914 » Mon Jul 31, 2006 5:06 pm

Thunder44 wrote:
HurricaneHunter914 wrote:http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/avn.jpg

99L has an "eye" like feature with it, but its probably the dry are getting sicked into the system.


That's not where the center is. It's further north.


In that case, this is on the brim of becoming a TD.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#193 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Mon Jul 31, 2006 5:06 pm

AJC3 wrote:
Extremeweatherguy wrote:
NDG wrote:
AJC3 wrote:
wxman57 wrote:Y'all can continue your argument, I'll just post a few observations.

It does appear that 99L has a weak LLC located west of the convection. Winds on the west and southwest side appeat to be 15 kts or less. About 20-25 kts east of the center.

Movement appears to be to the WNW at about 15 kts.

The disturbance is located in the southeast quadrant of an upper-level low, a region that tends to cause a flare-up of thunderstorms, as we've seen today.

Once the disturbance moves a bit more to the west-northwest, the enhanced lifting caused by the upper low will diminish. The big question is whether or not the upper low was able to jump-start the disturbance enough to keep the storms going after the enhanced lifting diminishes. That remains to be seen.

If not, then we'll have a weak swirl of clouds out there for a day or two until it encounters the 2nd upper low over the SE Bahamas. Once there, storms should flare up again.

If the convection maintains itself after passing the axis of the upper level trof tonight, then shear will briefly drop and a TD could form. It would move WNW and eventually interact with the stronger upper low over the SE Bahamas. Wind shear there is fairly strong. Could rip it apart.

Making it to the southeas or south-central Gulf as a TD/TS will be a difficult trek.

End of observations. Carry on with the arguments. ;-)


Chris, one minor point to pick. The TUTT low is actually pinching off due N of the system, hence the NNW shear - I think there's pretty strong divergence aloft nonetheless. As I mentioned in another post, I think this will allow it to sneak past and ahead of the TUTT low begins before it begins to retrograde WWD.

I'll go out on a limb and say this will have no trouble maintaining at lest some convection, although it will remain in a pretty parched air mass for the next 24 hours or so. From then on, I think it will intensify.


I agree with you AJC, the TUTT low is currently due N of 99L and it will get ahead of it before both TUTT lows start retrogating westward, so 99L could very well ride between the two of them.
So, AJC3, you think this is going to intensify beyond 24 hours? How strong do you think this has the potential to become?



Well, I don't see overall environmental conditions as becoming that great. While the air mass well ahead of the system beyond 24 hours won't be as dryas it is now, it's not going to become terribly moist either.

Similarly, while I think shear will decrease, I still think there will be some northerly shear for another day or so.

A lot of if's here. I certainly don't see rapid strenghtening, assuming any occurs at all. Once it does become a TC, I'd probably call for slow strenghtening... no more than 5 knots/12 hours. I really don't want to get any more specific than that, especially being at home and not having all the guidance here in front of me.
ok. thanks AJC3.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

#194 Postby ROCK » Mon Jul 31, 2006 5:11 pm

Weatherfreak000 wrote:Wow......I can't believe i'm saying this but.....that is a depression...no doubt about it.



hmmm.....I guess the Houston Texans will win the Superbowl this year.... :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#195 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Mon Jul 31, 2006 5:12 pm

ROCK wrote:
Weatherfreak000 wrote:Wow......I can't believe i'm saying this but.....that is a depression...no doubt about it.



hmmm.....I guess the Houston Texans will win the Superbowl this year.... :lol:
:lol: :lol:
0 likes   

Stratosphere747
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3772
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 8:34 pm
Location: Surfside Beach/Freeport Tx
Contact:

#196 Postby Stratosphere747 » Mon Jul 31, 2006 5:15 pm

ROCK wrote:
Weatherfreak000 wrote:Wow......I can't believe i'm saying this but.....that is a depression...no doubt about it.



hmmm.....I guess the Houston Texans will win the Superbowl this year.... :lol:


Still not a depression...If so, than 98L was a borderline cat 2...

PSL holder here...Front row, 10yd line south, opposing side. 8-8 this year..
0 likes   

User avatar
storms in NC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2338
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Wallace,NC 40 miles NE of Wilm
Contact:

#197 Postby storms in NC » Mon Jul 31, 2006 5:16 pm

And who will shave thier head? :blow: :sadly: :roflmao: :roflmao:
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

#198 Postby ROCK » Mon Jul 31, 2006 5:17 pm

Stratosphere747 wrote:
ROCK wrote:
Weatherfreak000 wrote:Wow......I can't believe i'm saying this but.....that is a depression...no doubt about it.



hmmm.....I guess the Houston Texans will win the Superbowl this year.... :lol:


Still not a depression...If so, than 98L was a borderline cat 2...

PSL holder here...Front row, 10yd line south, opposing side. 8-8 this year..



So extremely close in my book. NHC will probably end all of this tonight.
0 likes   

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15446
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

#199 Postby NDG » Mon Jul 31, 2006 5:20 pm

storms in NC wrote:And who will shave thier head? :blow: :sadly: :roflmao: :roflmao:


Good question!!! Thanks for reminding us.
0 likes   

User avatar
skysummit
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5305
Age: 49
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Ponchatoula, LA
Contact:

#200 Postby skysummit » Mon Jul 31, 2006 5:20 pm

I'm beginning to see thickening cloud cover on the northwest and west sides for the first time.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], StormWeather and 39 guests