NATL: MELISSA - Aftermath - Discussion: Josh Morgerman video of Melissa is up
Moderator: S2k Moderators
- xtyphooncyclonex
- Category 5

- Posts: 3889
- Age: 24
- Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2012 9:07 am
- Location: Cebu City
- Contact:
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Melissa looks and feels like a late-season, high-end WestPac super typhoon
6 likes
REMINDER: My opinions that I, or any other NON Pro-Met in this forum, are unofficial. Please do not take my opinions as an official forecast and warning. I am NOT a meteorologist. Following my forecasts blindly may lead to false alarm, danger and risk if official forecasts from agencies are ignored.
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Travorum wrote:sasha_B wrote:Travorum wrote:
Raw T# is back to where it was almost 24 hours ago which is especially impressive given that in the meantime the CI# at every timestep since then has stayed above any prior CI# that any hurricane has set since ADT was implemented.
Better than that. As of 0030z, Melissa now holds or ties the record for raw, adjusted, *and* final-T (as well as CI) on ADT:2025OCT28 003020 8.0 888.8 170.0 8.0 8.4 8.4 NO LIMIT OFF OFF OFF OFF 17.48 -80.20 EYE
With how rapidly the CDG is building in the W half I think Melissa is about to max out the scale on Raw T#.
T8.5 Melissa would truly be something. And given the mismatch between ground conditions and satellite appearance, and the fact that (as the NHC has repeatedly stressed) a Cat 4/5 is a Cat 4/5, there's no reason not to root for it..... but alas, we're back down to a mere CI 8.1 / T# 8.2.
4 likes
-
CrazyC83
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 34308
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
903 mb on the Air Force plane. This seems to be going upwards again...
4 likes
-
CrazyC83
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 34308
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
zzzh wrote:Extrap 902.8mb!!!
Also with the trends, you could make an easy case for 155 kt and possibly 160 kt.
4 likes
-
Keldeo1997
- Category 2

- Posts: 688
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 11:35 pm
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

uhhhh
902 with 20 kt barb so we are very close....
Last edited by Keldeo1997 on Mon Oct 27, 2025 8:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
3 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
NOAA pass: 162 kt FL to the SSE, 152 kt FL to the NNW, 909.2 mb extrap
AF pass: 156 kt FL to the SE, 902.8 mb extrap
Why the huge difference with their extrap pressures, though? Did NOAA miss the center?
AF pass: 156 kt FL to the SE, 902.8 mb extrap
Why the huge difference with their extrap pressures, though? Did NOAA miss the center?
1 likes
TC naming lists: retirements and intensity
Most aggressive Advisory #1's in North Atlantic (cr. kevin for starting the list)
Most aggressive Advisory #1's in North Atlantic (cr. kevin for starting the list)
- xtyphooncyclonex
- Category 5

- Posts: 3889
- Age: 24
- Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2012 9:07 am
- Location: Cebu City
- Contact:
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Melissa looks and feels like a late-season, high-end WestPac super typhoon
2 likes
REMINDER: My opinions that I, or any other NON Pro-Met in this forum, are unofficial. Please do not take my opinions as an official forecast and warning. I am NOT a meteorologist. Following my forecasts blindly may lead to false alarm, danger and risk if official forecasts from agencies are ignored.
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
902.8 extrap, holy cow. She’s going nuts again.
Edit: NOAA is still reporting 909-910mb. FL winds went up though.
Edit: NOAA is still reporting 909-910mb. FL winds went up though.
Last edited by aspen on Mon Oct 27, 2025 8:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21
I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.
I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.
-
HurricaneRyan
- Category 3

- Posts: 842
- Age: 31
- Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2010 3:05 pm
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Is this supposed to still make landfall in Jamaica? the further west it gets the more I think it will miss it and then make landfall in Cuba instead.
0 likes
Kay '22 Hilary '23
-
CrazyC83
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 34308
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Teban54 wrote:NOAA pass: 162 kt FL to the SSE, 152 kt FL to the NNW, 909.2 mb extrap
AF pass: 156 kt FL to the SE, 902.8 mb extrap
Why the huge difference with their extrap pressures, though? Did NOAA miss the center?
That seems likely.
1 likes
-
CrazyC83
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 34308
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
HurricaneRyan wrote:Is this supposed to still make landfall in Jamaica? the further west it gets the more I think it will miss it and then make landfall in Cuba instead.
Yes, in western Jamaica.
But if it misses Jamaica, that is terrible for Cuba, since it won't weaken nearly as much due to land interaction (if at all).
1 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Quite puzzled by the discrepancy between NOAA and AF here, unless Kermit missed the center.
2 likes
- Category5Kaiju
- Category 5

- Posts: 4305
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2020 12:45 pm
- Location: Seattle and Phoenix
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Oh wow, 902.8?
Remember when sub-900 mbar storms normally happened every decade, if not longer?
Should Melissa actually make it below 900, 2024-2025 would have the extraordinary distinction of being the first time in recorded history that sub-900 mbar storms happened in back to back years.
Remember when sub-900 mbar storms normally happened every decade, if not longer?
Should Melissa actually make it below 900, 2024-2025 would have the extraordinary distinction of being the first time in recorded history that sub-900 mbar storms happened in back to back years.
3 likes
Unless explicitly stated, all info in my posts is based on my own opinions and observations. Tropical storms and hurricanes can be extremely dangerous. Refer to an accredited weather research agency or meteorologist if you need to make serious decisions regarding an approaching storm.
- Hurricane2022
- Category 5

- Posts: 1957
- Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2022 11:38 pm
- Location: Araçatuba, Brazil
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
That's a drop of 6-7 mb from the last pass. Should this continue and we may see something like 898-896 mb in the next pass. Another historic and unforgettable night to us, especially for the people of Jamaica and Cuba.
4 likes
Sorry for the bad English sometimes...!
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.
--------
ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.
--------
ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Beef Stew wrote:Quite puzzled by the discrepancy between NOAA and AF here, unless Kermit missed the center.
Let's wait for the AF drop to confirm. NOAA's eye drop is already available (907 mb / 6 kt).
1 likes
TC naming lists: retirements and intensity
Most aggressive Advisory #1's in North Atlantic (cr. kevin for starting the list)
Most aggressive Advisory #1's in North Atlantic (cr. kevin for starting the list)
-
tolakram
- Admin

- Posts: 20167
- Age: 62
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
- Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
It hit the ridge, wobbled a bit, now stationary to just a bit of eastward motion IMO.
saved loop

source: https://weather.cod.edu/satrad/?parms=meso-meso1-13-96-1-25-2&checked=latlon-usint-map&colorbar=undefined
saved loop

source: https://weather.cod.edu/satrad/?parms=meso-meso1-13-96-1-25-2&checked=latlon-usint-map&colorbar=undefined
3 likes
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Wow...we may see a sub 900mb storm overnight. Just incredible.
I just hope recon brought extra dropsondes, I think the AF may have ran out this morning as their were none dropped on their final eye pass.
We may may get a chance to see a higher winds from the dropsondes than this morning's 210kts @917mb pressure altitude(iirc the surface at that drop was 935mb)
I just hope recon brought extra dropsondes, I think the AF may have ran out this morning as their were none dropped on their final eye pass.
We may may get a chance to see a higher winds from the dropsondes than this morning's 210kts @917mb pressure altitude(iirc the surface at that drop was 935mb)
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests









