SouthDadeFish wrote:RL3AO wrote:I do think people laugh off the HWRF a little too much. It's gotten pretty good. For example, here's the intensity error from 2015 between the GFS, Euro, HWRF, and NHC.
Thanks for sharing this. When you posted this I presumed that although the absolute error was relatively low, there would likely be a large positive bias, but this isn't the case either. Glad to see the hard work by the good people working on the HWRF is paying off.
Thats what I thought too, but it actually had a slightly negative bias.