ATL: Tropical Depression Dolly

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#1901 Postby KWT » Wed Jul 16, 2008 4:56 pm

Well there we have offical word on what the NHC thinks, close but not quite there from the sounds of things. Still watching very closely though just in case it does something during tonights Dmax which is possible.

Also note...could become a tropical depression at any time...
Last edited by KWT on Wed Jul 16, 2008 4:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

Re: Re:

#1902 Postby Derek Ortt » Wed Jul 16, 2008 4:56 pm

RL3AO wrote:
tomdrewls wrote:I thought there have been systems recently that did just fine despite high shear? Hmmm... Maybe those were storms that had already formed though.


A well developed system (hurricane) can usually hold off shear for a little bit. A developing system cannot. Anything over 15 knots and it doesn't have much chance for form. The Central Caribbean is near 40kts. A hurricane can form in 26C water if there is no shear. A hurricane won't form in 32C water with 25 kts of shear.

In this case, the lower level winds are moving very fast while the upper level winds are not. That creates the shear. In the case of Dean last year, the lower level winds were pretty strong from the east, but so were the middle and upper levels. So it didn't actually feel any shear. Thats not the case here.


Chapter 3 of my M.S. Thesis showed that weaker systems are more shear resistant than more intense ones
0 likes   

Cryomaniac
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1289
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 2:26 pm
Location: Newark, Nottinghamshire, UK
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L near the Windward Islands

#1903 Postby Cryomaniac » Wed Jul 16, 2008 4:57 pm

Innotech wrote:whether this storm forms or not, its not even worth worrying about damage or danger from it.


That's a pretty stupid thing to say in my opinion.
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: Re:

#1904 Postby RL3AO » Wed Jul 16, 2008 4:59 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:Chapter 3 of my M.S. Thesis showed that weaker systems are more shear resistant than more intense ones


That makes sense to me if there was 40kt of shear at 300mb or so, but wouldn't it impact a weak system more if the shear was 40kt at 850 mb?
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

Re:

#1905 Postby senorpepr » Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:00 pm

KWT wrote:Well there we have offical word on what the NHC thinks, close but not quite there from the sounds of things. Still watching very closely though just in case it does something during tonights Dmax which is possible.

Also note...could become a tropical depression at any time...



Although I doubt an upgrade will occur without recon. With the mission two scheduled at 12am EDT... I don't see it the upgrade happening until 5am tomorrow morning AT THE EARLIEST.

Then again... stranger things have happened...
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#1906 Postby HURAKAN » Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:01 pm

The push needed will probably come tonight after DMAX. Of course, shear must play a nice paper, which is not the forecast.
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

Re: Re:

#1907 Postby senorpepr » Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:02 pm

cat5canes77 wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:Chapter 3 of my M.S. Thesis showed that weaker systems are more shear resistant than more intense ones
No, it's just easier to notice when a stronger storm is sheared. If it's 140mph then 30kts of shear will knock it down a lot. If however it's just a 40mph tropical storm the shear wont have as much of an impact because it is so weak already. It does not mean they are more resistant. 30kts of shear is 30kts of shear no matter what.


...and what makes you qualified to say that?
0 likes   

User avatar
Innotech
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1031
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 5:32 pm
Location: Lafayette, Louisiana
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L near the Windward Islands

#1908 Postby Innotech » Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:02 pm

Cryomaniac wrote:
Innotech wrote:whether this storm forms or not, its not even worth worrying about damage or danger from it.


That's a pretty stupid thing to say in my opinion.

Sorry. youre right. 20 mph winds might knock over a table or something.
0 likes   

Rainband

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L near the Windward Islands

#1909 Postby Rainband » Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:03 pm

Innotech wrote:whether this storm forms or not, its not even worth worrying about damage or danger from it. Just a bit of wind and rain. I could see it being an issue with a major hurricane thread or something, but this thing is still barely an invest. Definitely over the top to regulate this particular thread much.
All strong storms come from something, S2K is about discussing the Tropics. thats what people are doing. Tone your comments down a notch :D
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

Re: Re:

#1910 Postby Derek Ortt » Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:04 pm

cat5canes77 wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:Chapter 3 of my M.S. Thesis showed that weaker systems are more shear resistant than more intense ones
No, it's just easier to notice when a stronger storm is sheared. If it's 140mph then 30kts of shear will knock it down a lot. If however it's just a 40mph tropical storm the shear wont have as much of an impact because it is so weak already. It does not mean they are more resistant. 30kts of shear is 30kts of shear no matter what.


you're arguing against facts that were reviewed by my Thesis Comittee.

I actually looked at every 6 hour time period for all TCs of TS intensity or greater from 1987 and did the correlation and mean shear values for the 12 hour intensity change.

Shear that is favorable for intensification for a tropical storm is favorable for weakening of a major hurricane
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L near the Windward Islands

#1911 Postby senorpepr » Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:04 pm

Innotech wrote:
Cryomaniac wrote:
Innotech wrote:whether this storm forms or not, its not even worth worrying about damage or danger from it.


That's a pretty stupid thing to say in my opinion.

Sorry. youre right. 20 mph winds might knock over a table or something.


It's not the winds, but the rainfall. It's easy to get a mudslide in this part of the world...
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L=Special Statement=No TD at this time

#1912 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:05 pm

Like I said earlier I hate thise kinds of systems. I laugh at all that forecasted this season to have more then 15 storms. I mean it will be a ok season with a good cape verdes, but not a "big deal". In fact it is pretty good forecast to go with 12-14 named storms, what ever climo we do have shows that is what is about what we get with active phase like the one we are in.

I'm going to watch Bertha and the Eastern Pacific. Its starting to kick backside big time. I will keep one eye on this in case it doe's something. I could suprized with this season at the end, who knows.
0 likes   

User avatar
Innotech
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1031
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 5:32 pm
Location: Lafayette, Louisiana
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L near the Windward Islands

#1913 Postby Innotech » Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:08 pm

senorpepr wrote:
It's not the winds, but the rainfall. It's easy to get a mudslide in this part of the world...

I doubt that would be a problem in this particular storm. its basically a slightly stronger than normal tropical wave right now.

I mean look, if it was developing into a tropical storm, sure it would be something to worry about, but right now its no worse than a typical storm going over the islands. If it did close off a circulation and begin to strengthen obviously it would be something worth taking caution for.
Last edited by Innotech on Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#1914 Postby HURAKAN » Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:08 pm

Image
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

Re: Re:

#1915 Postby Derek Ortt » Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:09 pm

cat5canes77 wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:I actually looked at every 6 hour time period for all TCs of TS intensity or greater from 1987 and did the correlation and mean shear values for the 12 hour intensity change.

Shear that is favorable for intensification for a tropical storm is favorable for weakening of a major hurricane
Again, this is not because a 40mph tropical storm has something in it that makes it more "shear resistant". It's already so weak that the shear will not have as much of an impact weakening it. When your starting point is 140mph, and you get 30kts of shear, you have a lot of room to go down. If you start dropping from 40mph then your fall will be less.


that is so far from the truth

15.5KT of shear is about the mean shear for intensifying tropical storms. It is about the mean shear for weakening major hurricanes

Now tell me that one is not more shear resistant than the other
0 likes   

mattpetre
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 510
Age: 53
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 3:20 pm
Location: Missouri City,TX & Galleria
Contact:

#1916 Postby mattpetre » Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:10 pm

Why are we all hating? Too many people in the world? I'm sick of this. I give up on the weather, I give up on people being friendly, I give up... Stupid the way we react to one another...
0 likes   

mattpetre
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 510
Age: 53
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 3:20 pm
Location: Missouri City,TX & Galleria
Contact:

#1917 Postby mattpetre » Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:12 pm

It's dead Hank! This storm has been dead for over 24hrs now, why are you still talking about it?
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: Re:

#1918 Postby RL3AO » Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:12 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:that is so far from the truth

15.5KT of shear is about the mean shear for intensifying tropical storms. It is about the mean shear for weakening major hurricanes

Now tell me that one is not more shear resistant than the other


Question. How often is the shear being caused at the lower levels (the Caribbean now) than at the upper levels? And did your research look at just the shear (200mb-850mb?), or did it also look at if the shear was caused at the upper, middle, or lower levels? Hopefully that made sense.
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

Re: Re:

#1919 Postby senorpepr » Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:14 pm

cat5canes77 wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:that is so far from the truth

15.5KT of shear is about the mean shear for intensifying tropical storms. It is about the mean shear for weakening major hurricanes

Now tell me that one is not more shear resistant than the other

It takes a much more favorable environment to maintain a 140mph hurricane than it does a 40mph tropical storm. A tropical storm could in fact strengthen at 15kts of shear and 140mph could weaken in 15kts of shear. This is simply because the hurricane is so strong the environment must be nearly perfect to maintain itself. The only shear resistant element to a tropical storm is that it's so weak it takes a lot more shear to cause a negative impact.


Seriously... what qualifications do you have to argue this? Derek has more than enough support on his side.
0 likes   

User avatar
Just Joshing You
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 512
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 10:29 am
Location: Nova Scotia

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L=Special Statement=No TD at this time

#1920 Postby Just Joshing You » Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:15 pm

Why are you arguing against a pro-met... that's like telling the President you can do a better job. Either get the credentials to back up your claim or just stop. It seems like you're trying to troll.
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests