GulfBreezer wrote:GalvestonDuck wrote:Those who did probably agree with our nation's motto. However, he swore the judicial oath, probably with his hand on the Bible, and he didn't honor that oath.
"I, __________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of Alabama, and obey the laws thereof; that I am not disqualified from holding the office of __________; that I will faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter. So help me God."
AMEN A MILLION TIMES DUCK!!! I too admire his stance, but there has to be a line drawn and if he was allowed to cross it, well, we all know what can of worms that would open. I dont believe that it was an easy decision for them to make but they had an obligation too.
This is exactly the point! Just imagine an opposite situation occuring. If there was a court order to remove the symbol of Wiccan religion out of the Supreme Court and they defied a court order... everyone would be lining up to get the chance to "unseat" him. The decision made today was not a religious one. The decisions before this day, however, were. I admire the former justice for his stance, but the law is the law.