The Hurricane Charley coverup

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
HurricaneBill
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: East Longmeadow, MA, USA

#21 Postby HurricaneBill » Mon Nov 29, 2004 2:15 pm

tallywx wrote:Well well, so what I initially took for an outlandish story may not be so out there after all. very interesting hearing the accounts of people from that area who have nothing to gain by being fanciful. As I used to be investigative news editor of a minor newspaper, I may head down there next break I get and poke around a bit.


Please do. I see absolutely no reason why a death toll should be understated.

Tallywx, maybe you should try and do a story on migrant workers too. Illegal immigrants or not, they're people too.
0 likes   

DoctorHurricane2003

#22 Postby DoctorHurricane2003 » Mon Nov 29, 2004 2:32 pm

Yeah and I was here after Ivan! There were the same types of rumors here! Give me a break people:

1. There is no logical reason to underreport deaths. Higher death count = higher number of people who leave for next hurricane.

2. They must bring in a @$^# load of body bags just in case there are high amounts of casualties. Just because there ARE body bags, doesn't mean there are dead people, if anything, in them. Sometimes body bags are used for dead animals as well.

3. They always lock down an area after a hurricane...would you like to trip over an electrical wire you did not see?

4. Hearing what 'so-and-so' says about what he saw could really be damaging to anyone's reputation. As a scientist, you must find FOR YOURSELF. What he says could be an exaggeration, he could have mis-seen something, etc., etc.
0 likes   

chadtm80

#23 Postby chadtm80 » Mon Nov 29, 2004 2:35 pm

DoctorHurricane2003 wrote:Yeah and I was here after Ivan! There were the same types of rumors here! Give me a break people:

1. There is no logical reason to underreport deaths. Higher death count = higher number of people who leave for next hurricane.

2. They must bring in a @$^# load of body bags just in case there are high amounts of casualties. Just because there ARE body bags, doesn't mean there are dead people, if anything, in them. Sometimes body bags are used for dead animals as well.

3. They always lock down an area after a hurricane...would you like to trip over an electrical wire you did not see?

4. Hearing what 'so-and-so' says about what he saw could really be damaging to anyone's reputation. As a scientist, you must find FOR YOURSELF. What he says could be an exaggeration, he could have mis-seen something, etc., etc.

Here Here.. I was shaking my head reading some of that stupid report.. and was shocked with some of the posts I saw..
0 likes   

User avatar
vbhoutex
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 29133
Age: 74
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
Location: Cypress, TX
Contact:

#24 Postby vbhoutex » Mon Nov 29, 2004 2:59 pm

Until there is verifiable proof-pictures, etc.- I have to believe the actual death toll from any of these storms is close to what has been reported. In this age of total communication and tiny hidden cameras, etc. there is no way IMO that a massive cover-up such as is suggested could occur, unless all of the citizenry were also moved out of the area, and they haven't been.
0 likes   
Skywarn, C.E.R.T.
Please click below to donate to STORM2K to help with the expenses of keeping the site going:
Image


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 482 guests