Derek Ortt wrote:the correction is is that Avila said "Upper winds are forecast to become more favorable"
Nowhere did he say that the necessary low-level dynamics are more favorable. If we do not have sufficient low-level convergence, it really doesn't matter how favorable the UL winds are. Due to mass continuity, if there is not low level convergence, there is not going to be the necessary vertical velocity to cause pressures to fall
quote
"BUT UPPER-LEVEL WINDS ARE FORECAST TO BECOME
FAVORABLE FOR SOME DEVELOPMENT DURING THE NEXT DAY OR TWO"
FOR SOME DEVELOPMENT ? That doesnt quailfy as possible development?
Derek he didnt have to say any of what you have just said since he said quote"
BUT UPPER-LEVEL WINDS ARE FORECAST TO BECOME
FAVORABLE FOR SOME DEVELOPMENT DURING THE NEXT DAY OR TWO"
He never included all that in his discussion so unless you have a 4 year degree in meterology and specialize in tropical weather how could one come to that conclusion?
Again "possible development" was a valid conclusion from that and all discussions the NHC has written today.
Steve