#22 Postby TexasStooge » Sat Oct 15, 2005 8:16 am
Yep, I was right, it's gonna be like one of those "Wilmer-Hutchins ISD" kind of incidents.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bus firm facing 2 inquiries
Exclusive: Focus is why company got passing grade before deadly fire
By STEVE McGONIGLE, MICHAEL GRABELL and HOLLY BECKA / The Dallas Morning News
The U.S. Department of Transportation is investigating why its regulators gave a satisfactory rating to a tour company involved in last month's fatal bus fire near Dallas for almost two years before concluding it was an imminent hazard to the public.
The office of Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta also requested that the agency's independent watchdog conduct an investigation, The Dallas Morning News has learned.
The reviews will examine how Global Limo Inc. of Pharr, operator of the bus in which 23 elderly hurricane evacuees died, kept the satisfactory rating for 20 months before being depicted as a rogue operator and forced to cease operations Oct. 7, said Transportation Department spokesman Brian Turmail.
A much-criticized safety rating system that federal regulators use to identify problem carriers is likely to be a focus of both inquiries. Although Global had one of the lowest driver safety scores of any bus carrier, no review had been triggered.
"We really have a lot of questions [about the ratings], and we really want to get to the bottom of that as quickly as possible," Mr. Turmail said.
A review team established by Annette Sandberg, administrator of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, began work last week, Mr. Turmail said. This week, he said, Mr. Mineta's office asked Inspector General Kenneth Mead to conduct his own inquiry.
David Barnes, a spokesman for Mr. Mead, confirmed the request from Mr. Mineta's office but declined to discuss what matters would be examined.
He said an inspector general investigation could result in civil or criminal penalties. "I can't stress enough, just because we've initiated an investigation doesn't necessarily mean it's going to result in a finding of wrongdoing," Mr. Barnes said.
The motor carrier administration, an arm of the Transportation Department, regulates the safety of interstate bus companies. It was the most recent regulatory agency to review Global's overall compliance with safety regulations.
Mr. Turmail characterized both the internal review and the request to Mr. Mead as routine reflections of Mr. Mineta's commitment to improving transit safety.
Jerry Donaldson, a longtime observer of the motor carrier agency, called the internal review "unprecedented." He said he was skeptical it would produce meaningful change in what critics have labeled as one of government's worst-run agencies.
But he said the request to Mr. Mead, a vocal critic, sends the signal that the Transportation Department considers the situation to be serious.
"He's been after this agency hammer and tong," said Mr. Donaldson, senior researcher for Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety. "If the OIG does an investigation, you are going to be sure you are going to get a really candid appraisal."
The dual reviews are being launched within days of the motor carrier administration taking the rare step of ordering Global to cease operations. The order followed a two-week compliance review that found 168 violations of federal safety regulations, more than half related to maintenance and vehicle conditions.
Ms. Sandberg approved the shutdown order, Mr. Turmail said.
Investigators examining the fatal Sept. 23 fire on Global's bus have cited inadequate maintenance of the rear brakes and wheel bearings as the likely reason a rear tire caught fire, setting off explosions that incinerated the vehicle.
Global's attorney, Mark Cooper, did not return a phone call on Friday. James Maples, the bus company's owner, could not be reached.
Lawsuits filed on behalf of victims of the accident have accused Global of operating negligently.
Houston attorney Robert Luke, who is representing two survivors of the bus fire as well as families of three people who died in it, said he was pleased to hear that motor carrier officials were conducting an internal investigation.
"I'm glad they're at least grading their own papers. There are going to be a lot of people outside of the government rating their papers as well, and the lawyers on the case are going to be some of those people."
Company problems
Global and its predecessor, Global Tours and Charters, have a history of financial troubles and allegations of shoddy maintenance and records keeping. Mr. Maples filed for bankruptcy protection from his creditors in February 2005. Since 2001, he and other drivers have been stopped more than a dozen times by state and federal inspectors.
The Texas Department of Public Safety, the state agency that also regulates bus companies, conducted an "educational contact" with the company in April 2002 after receiving complaints from customers about its operations.
The inspection found several violations of safety regulations and "strongly advised" Mr. Maples to implement improvements. But it did not result in any further enforcement action or any follow-up reviews by state authorities.
The DPS review was conducted by Juan Jauregui, a civilian investigator who subsequently went to work for the federal motor carrier agency. Since 2003, Mr. Jauregui has been a private safety consultant. Global is one of his clients.
"He's always had a positive attitude towards safety," Mr. Jauregui said of Global's owner. "I know the reports say otherwise."
Mr. Turmail said the internal review would also look at Mr. Jauregui's role in the motor carrier agency's 2004 compliance review. Mr. Jauregui was interviewed as part of that review, which found several violations of records keeping regulations that were similar to those he had discovered in his 2002 inspection.
In an interview this week, Mr. Jauregui said that his participation in the 2004 compliance review had no effect on the investigator, a former colleague.
The 2004 compliance review was prompted by four negative roadside inspections the year before, particularly involving incidents when drivers exceeded maximum working hours or didn't have a logbook, Mr. Turmail said.
As a result of the review, the Texas office of the motor carrier agency was supposed to monitor the company through SafeStat, a statistical rating system drawn from reports of contacts by state and federal safety regulators.
Critics, which include Mr. Mead, the inspector general, have alleged that SafeStat is ineffective because the records that it relies on are incomplete and do not give an accurate assessment of small carriers, which represent the bulk of bus companies.
SafeStat, which stands for Safety Status Measurement System, rates companies in four categories: drivers, vehicles, accidents and overall safety management. Global was initially given a rating of 74 for driver safety, which is one point below a threshold that warns of serious problems. In March 2005, the driver safety rating jumped to 97.
Mr. Turmail attributed the higher score to a single incident involving a Global bus driver. Because the rating is calculated in part on the size of the company, he said, such a sharp increase would not be seen as abnormal. He also noted that it generally requires SafeStat scores above 75 in two or more categories to trigger a compliance review.
June, August incidents
Nor was it unusual, he said, that the company's safety rating was not affected by two additional incidents in June and August in which Global drivers were taken off the road for records keeping and licensing issues.
No compliance review of Global was planned, he said, before the Wilmer fire, which occurred as the patients were being evacuated from a nursing home in Houston in advance of Hurricane Rita.
The bus fire triggered the second compliance review, Mr. Turmail said.
"This is a horrific incident," he said, "and we wanted to make sure no stone was left unturned."
0 likes