linkerweather wrote:melhow wrote:linkerweather wrote:StormFury wrote:Could I guys tell me what you are all talking about in ENGLISH? From what I am hearing, the GFS data could have been screwed up (human error), resulting in screwed up GFDL, BAMM, and BAMD models. I think there could have been human error because of what you guys said about there being no dropsonde (however it's spelled).
As a result, I bet that the new GFS, GFDL, BAMM, and BAMD model runs will once again point to Florida in the next run, assuming that there are dropsondes and no human or computer screw ups.
Also, I've seen Wilma drifting to the NW in the last few frames...maybe she is starting to make that northward move. Not convinced? Place your finger at the initial position of the eye...then see where the eye ends up!
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT ... -loop.html
You will have to wait until the 00z runs of the GFS and ultimately the GFDL which will come out around 1:50 am EDT. The 18z runs are an extension of the 12z runs (with some added data) but based off the 12z data. That is often why you don't find any monumental info coming out of 06z or 18z model runs
Hey Josh,
Model question - do you think that the last GFDL was a lousy run based off of skewed data, or do you think that it could "hold water", so to speak?
Thats impossible to say for sure. I mean the GFDL uses the GFS grid so if the GFS was Bad, which it may even be, just some data was alledgedly left out, then the gfdl would be bad also. We really have to wait until the 00z run unfortunately IMO
Mr. Linker, just curious; won't the more detailed or accurate model runs occur after the NOAA high altitude drops are combined with the normal recon drops?
That wouldn't be until 20.10.2005 0000Z runs if I'm not mistaken?
