Big Quake....Russia

Chat about anything and everything... (well almost anything) Whether it be the front porch or the pot belly stove or news of interest or a topic of your liking, this is the place to post it.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38108
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

#21 Postby Brent » Fri Apr 21, 2006 12:42 am

Matt-hurricanewatcher wrote:BIG QUAKE? Its a 7.7 quake not very big...See I think something is big when its at least a 8.5 quake.

Thats just the way I'm...

:roll:


The 1906 San Francisco earthquake has a 7.8 estimate. That's not big to you???
0 likes   
#neversummer

User avatar
Aslkahuna
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4550
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 5:00 pm
Location: Tucson, AZ
Contact:

#22 Postby Aslkahuna » Fri Apr 21, 2006 1:24 am

Actually, the USGS considers the Lome Prieta Earthquake of 1989 a 6.9. The 6.2 in Seattle was a deep earthquake so the shaking was nothing compared to what it would have been had it been a shallow depth earthquake.

Steve
0 likes   

User avatar
James
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1531
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 10:29 am
Location: Gloucestershire, England
Contact:

#23 Postby James » Fri Apr 21, 2006 1:26 am

For another example, the devastating Kobe earthquake in 1995 was a 7.2
0 likes   

User avatar
Aslkahuna
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4550
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 5:00 pm
Location: Tucson, AZ
Contact:

#24 Postby Aslkahuna » Fri Apr 21, 2006 5:02 am

When did they upgrade that one? The last I had heard was that it was identical in magnitude to the Northridge Earthquake that occurred precisely one year earlier with a MM of 6.7. The difference between Kobe and Northridge is that the Kobe earthquake was centered very close to the city while the CA shock was 20+ miles NW of downtown LA. Have to remember that 6.5-7.0's are the kind of quakes that have killed tens of thousands in places like Pakistan, Iran and Turkey and they are not really slouch type shocks.

Steve
0 likes   

User avatar
alicia-w
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6400
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 2:55 pm
Location: Tijeras, NM

#25 Postby alicia-w » Fri Apr 21, 2006 6:40 am

feederband wrote:
Matt-hurricanewatcher wrote:So a 1.0-3.0 is a depression
3.0 to 5.0 is a tropical storm
5.1-6.0 is a cat1
6.1 to 6.9 is a cat2
7.0 to 7.9 is a cat3 Major...
8.0 to 8.9 is a cat4
9.0 to 10.0 is a cat5

Just putting earth quakes next to hurricanes. What do you think?


hmmm


not even a relevant comparison.
0 likes   

User avatar
Gorky
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 334
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 7:23 am
Location: Scarborough, North Yorkshire, UK

#26 Postby Gorky » Fri Apr 21, 2006 6:48 am

Matt-hurricanewatcher wrote:So a 1.0-3.0 is a depression
3.0 to 5.0 is a tropical storm
5.1-6.0 is a cat1
6.1 to 6.9 is a cat2
7.0 to 7.9 is a cat3 Major...
8.0 to 8.9 is a cat4
9.0 to 10.0 is a cat5

Just putting earth quakes next to hurricanes. What do you think?


The problem is the hurricane scale is linear, whilst it's exponential for earthquakes. I'd say the best comparison would be along these lines...

0.0-1.0 - Someone sneezes
1.0-2.0 - Light Breeze
2.0-3.0 - Drizzle
3.0-4.0 - Rain Shower
4.0-5.0 - Thunderstorm
5.0-5.5 - Tropical Depression
5.5-6.0 - Tropical Storm
6.0-6.5 - Cat 1
6.5-6.9 - Cat 2
6.9-7.2 - Cat 3
7.2-7.5 - Cat 4
7.5-8.0 - Cat 5 160mph-180mph
8.0-9.0 - Cat5 180mph-200mph
9.0-9.5 - Megacane > 200mph

Of course, this is all kinda pointless as damage is also affected by quake depth, duration and the length of the fault affected... ;)
0 likes   

User avatar
James
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1531
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 10:29 am
Location: Gloucestershire, England
Contact:

#27 Postby James » Fri Apr 21, 2006 10:27 am

Aslkahuna wrote:When did they upgrade that one? The last I had heard was that it was identical in magnitude to the Northridge Earthquake that occurred precisely one year earlier with a MM of 6.7. The difference between Kobe and Northridge is that the Kobe earthquake was centered very close to the city while the CA shock was 20+ miles NW of downtown LA. Have to remember that 6.5-7.0's are the kind of quakes that have killed tens of thousands in places like Pakistan, Iran and Turkey and they are not really slouch type shocks.

Steve


Admittedly I did get that estimate off of Wikipedia, and I'm not sure how accurate it might be, so you're probably right.
0 likes   

User avatar
CentralFlGal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 573
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: Cocoa Beach, FL

#28 Postby CentralFlGal » Fri Apr 21, 2006 10:46 am

Since the damaging effects grow exponentially the higher the magnitude, I certainly wouldn't want to be in a 7.7 quake.
0 likes   

User avatar
alicia-w
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6400
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 2:55 pm
Location: Tijeras, NM

#29 Postby alicia-w » Fri Apr 21, 2006 11:01 am

When we lived in the Philippines, we experienced four earthquakes (83, 85, 86, and 88), all over 6.0. They were very scary and caused a fair amount of damage even in the rural area we were in. I would not want to do it again.
0 likes   


Return to “Off Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 46 guests