Thinking West-Central Gulf for Tropical Formation 9-12 Days

[Berwick Bay]

Air Force, what rule says that my opinion has to be based on what you are anyone else says? Its not gonna be that way with me. So in other words, its okay with you if someone resorts to personal attack because my "forecast" doesn't conform to what they would like to see? I didn't think we allowed hazing or "code red's" at this site.

[drezee]

BB, I believe that you may need to edit your post. I am not in the discussion.

[Aric Dunn]

by the way this is a good site .. to learn a few things .. it will take a little longer to be good at it.. im still working on it lol its been a few years of working on it. but eventually i get better. http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/~chu/chap3/s ... 3_contents

[Tampa Bay Hurricane]

I can note a substantial increase in moisture across the Caribbean so far
this week...and I would not be surprised if some of that moisture
makes its way into the GOM. Hence Berwick Bay I think that your
prediction might come true if that moisture can
get into the GOM where the ssts are already very warm.
Now also shear will be an important factor.

[sevenleft]

Air Force, what rule says that my opinion has to be based on what you are anyone else says? Its not gonna be that way with me. So in other words, its okay with you if someone resorts to personal attack because my "forecast" doesn't conform to what they would like to see? I didn't think we allowed hazing or "code red's" at this site.

You are allowed to post whatever you want. And just like you are allowed to post whatever forecast you want, we are allowed to question its meteorological backing. That is called discussion. If you wanted to be taken more seriously (by some of us), you would be able to support your claims, and not just play the "stop attacking me" card. There are no personal attacks being thrown around here, at all. Hazing? Geez.

You don't have to even discuss it with us; but don't whine and accuse people of attacking you when they aren't.

[Aric Dunn]

Air Force, what rule says that my opinion has to be based on what you are anyone else says? Its not gonna be that way with me. So in other words, its okay with you if someone resorts to personal attack because my "forecast" doesn't conform to what they would like to see? I didn't think we allowed hazing or "code red's" at this site.

ok .. for the last time .. nobody is attacking you!! or hazing .... its called "constructive criticism"

[Aric Dunn]

Air Force, what rule says that my opinion has to be based on what you are anyone else says? Its not gonna be that way with me. So in other words, its okay with you if someone resorts to personal attack because my "forecast" doesn't conform to what they would like to see? I didn't think we allowed hazing or "code red's" at this site.

You are allowed to post whatever you want. And just like you are allowed to post whatever forecast you want, we are allowed to question its meteorological backing. That is called discussion. If you wanted to be taken more seriously (by some of us), you would be able to support your claims, and not just play the "stop attacking me" card. There are no personal attacks being thrown around here, at all. Hazing? Geez.

thank you..

[Berwick Bay]

I'm a big boy, However, if you disagree with my forecasting, then stop using words like ridicule. I haven't seen you use that term with anyone else, and I can only infer that you feel threatened by me. BTW I'm going to hold you to your own words (not your forecast, anyone can have a failed forecast),but when you are first to use the word ridicule, you have to be careful. Especially in this business. Now I would suggest you keep your eyes focused on the Yucutan Penninsula.

[Aric Dunn]

I'm a big boy, However, if you disagree with my forecasting, then stop using words like ridicule. I haven't seen you use that term with anyone else, and I can only infer that you feel threatened by me. BTW I'm going to hold you to your own words (not your forecast, anyone can have a failed forecast),but when you are first to use the word ridicule, you have to be careful. Especially in this business. Now I would suggest you keep your eyes focused on the Yucutan Penninsula.

holy crap !! go back and read where the "ridicule" was first used..... it was used by someone you thought that it was .. but in fact it was not... i only used it as a quote!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Air Force Met]

Could you kids take it to another room? Between you two and the metaphysical forecasting being done...complete with poetry no less...I am having a hard time remembering that I am on the "TALKING TROPICS" forum.

Dang just when we start having fun the parents come home
O.K. we will be good AFM I promise

HEHEHE

[Aric Dunn]

In BB's defense.... His Barry's prediction was dead on, that's why I give him the respect to make predictions like this without ridicule. Granted he may get some wrong but he isn't going off of junk science.

.

and this is were the "ridicule" was used... it was my fault i should have caught myself and should not have used that again sorry .

ok here look !!!

you see now.. nobody is bashing you ridiculing you or hazing you or anything along those line!!! its "constructive criticism"

here is the definition

Main Entry: constructive criticism
Part of Speech: n
Definition: criticism or advice that is useful and intended to help or improve something, often with an offer of possible solutions

[sevenleft]

In BB's defense.... His Barry's prediction was dead on, that's why I give him the respect to make predictions like this without ridicule. Granted he may get some wrong but he isn't going off of junk science.

.

and this is were the "ridicule" was used... it was my fault i should have caught myself and should not have used that again sorry .

ok here look !!!

you see now.. nobody is bashing you ridiculing you or hazing you or anything along those line!!! its "constructive criticism"

here is the definition

Main Entry: constructive criticism
Part of Speech: n
Definition: criticism or advice that is useful and intended to help or improve something, often with an offer of possible solutions

I'd prolly just let it go.

[Air Force Met]

Air Force, what rule says that my opinion has to be based on what you are anyone else says? Its not gonna be that way with me. So in other words, its okay with you if someone resorts to personal attack because my "forecast" doesn't conform to what they would like to see? I didn't think we allowed hazing or "code red's" at this site.

Nobody has personally attacked you. Disagreeing with you or you methods is not an attack. Now...if they said that your methods were idiot and stupid...not worthy of discussion because you were a fool...then I would say you would have been attacked. I have not seen that. If you think that what has happened is personal attacks...then I would say you are a very sensative person.

[Stratosphere747]

I'd let his forecast play out, then we can go back and critique where he was right or wrong.

At least for the time being, there is nothing going on, IMO, that points to his forecast verifying. I'm looking at the Yuctan area BB, and it is about as tranquil as it can get for this time of the year...

[canetracker]

Could you kids take it to another room? Between you two and the metaphysical forecasting being done...complete with poetry no less...I am having a hard time remembering that I am on the "TALKING TROPICS" forum.

Dang just when we start having fun the parents come home
O.K. we will be good AFM I promise

HEHEHE

That is funny!!! In the midst of all of this heated debate, it is nice to find a post that makes you laugh.

[southerngale]

Can we get back on topic? I came to see how the prediction was going and instead, I read 3 pages of arguments. I don't see what I would call personal attacks, but could we all just play a little nicer? Take the OT stuff to PM or something, please. Thanks!

[drezee]

Air Force, what rule says that my opinion has to be based on what you are anyone else says? Its not gonna be that way with me. So in other words, its okay with you if someone resorts to personal attack because my "forecast" doesn't conform to what they would like to see? I didn't think we allowed hazing or "code red's" at this site.

Nobody has personally attacked you. Disagreeing with you or you methods is not an attack. Now...if they said that your methods were idiot and stupid...not worthy of discussion because you were a fool...then I would say you would have been attacked. I have not seen that. If you think that what has happened is personal attacks...then I would say you are a very sensative person.

You should have been here to see the bannings back in 04 and 05. Now those were some personal attacks. Cycloneye, the Dolphin and others had to clean it up a bit.

[southerngale]

Could you kids take it to another room? Between you two and the metaphysical forecasting being done...complete with poetry no less...I am having a hard time remembering that I am on the "TALKING TROPICS" forum.

Thanks for trying. I was having a hard time myself.

[boca]

Sometimes I feel its not worth posting a forecast due to whats happening here. Its just a posters prediction thats it.

[Aric Dunn]

Sometimes I feel its not worth posting a forecast due to whats happening here. Its just a posters prediction thats it.

if your not up to getting "constructive criticism" why are you posting.. thats why i post so i can get some feed back

im not here to force my "OPINIONS" on anyone.. but i do like feed back . it helps re think and look at more data to better refine my thinking..