ATL: SAM - Remnants - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
InfernoFlameCat
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2102
Age: 22
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2020 10:52 am
Location: Buford, GA

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#2001 Postby InfernoFlameCat » Fri Oct 01, 2021 11:09 am

NotoSans wrote:Looks like what some posters have suspected is indeed correct. It is not uncommon for storms benefiting from trough interaction but with a weak southern eyewall to find it difficult to mix winds effectively to the surface. Zeta last year has flight-level winds that obviously supporting something above 100kt, but NHC at last goes only with 100kt, adopting a lower-than-usual conversion factor.

The best estimate is 125-130kt based on a blend of flight-level and SFMR data.

The SFMR is experiencing issues with this mission. It glitched on multiple occasions.
0 likes   
I am by no means a professional. DO NOT look at my forecasts for official information or make decisions based on what I post.

Goal: to become a registered expert over tropical and subtropical cyclones.

User avatar
ElectricStorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5017
Age: 24
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#2002 Postby ElectricStorm » Fri Oct 01, 2021 11:11 am

I'd probably go 135kts for now, I'm hesitant to go with anything higher since SFMR is so low. Hopefully we get a good dropsonde in the NE eyewall.
2 likes   
I am in no way a professional. Take what I say with a grain of salt as I could be totally wrong. Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.

Boomer Sooner!

grapealcoholic
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 684
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2021 3:26 pm

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#2003 Postby grapealcoholic » Fri Oct 01, 2021 11:13 am

I think this storm is going to get upgraded in post-analysis anyway with its previous peak
0 likes   

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6091
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#2004 Postby cheezyWXguy » Fri Oct 01, 2021 11:13 am

InfernoFlameCat wrote:
NotoSans wrote:Looks like what some posters have suspected is indeed correct. It is not uncommon for storms benefiting from trough interaction but with a weak southern eyewall to find it difficult to mix winds effectively to the surface. Zeta last year has flight-level winds that obviously supporting something above 100kt, but NHC at last goes only with 100kt, adopting a lower-than-usual conversion factor.

The best estimate is 125-130kt based on a blend of flight-level and SFMR data.

The SFMR is experiencing issues with this mission. It glitched on multiple occasions.

Agreed. Trough interaction or not, there is little chance that winds in the SW quad are stronger than in the NE quad
2 likes   

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8812
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#2005 Postby aspen » Fri Oct 01, 2021 11:13 am

It’s best that the NHC waits until the 2pm intermediate advisory to upgrade Sam to 135 or 140 kt. The NW quadrant could theoretically have higher SFMR readings that better support the 90% FL-to-surface conversion, or maybe more 150-155kt FL winds. If not, Sam should either be kept at 130kt (85% FL-to-surface conversion) or maybe generously raised to 135 kt.
0 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

User avatar
ElectricStorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5017
Age: 24
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#2006 Postby ElectricStorm » Fri Oct 01, 2021 11:16 am

SW eyewall drop shows some nasty winds just above the surface. Probably gusts, but still pretty solid
0 likes   
I am in no way a professional. Take what I say with a grain of salt as I could be totally wrong. Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.

Boomer Sooner!

grapealcoholic
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 684
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2021 3:26 pm

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#2007 Postby grapealcoholic » Fri Oct 01, 2021 11:18 am

Eye still clearing -- it's approaching the 28c dropoff so very little time left to strengthen
0 likes   

User avatar
ElectricStorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5017
Age: 24
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#2008 Postby ElectricStorm » Fri Oct 01, 2021 11:18 am

NE eyewall drop shows the winds mixing down pretty well
3 likes   
I am in no way a professional. Take what I say with a grain of salt as I could be totally wrong. Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.

Boomer Sooner!

grapealcoholic
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 684
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2021 3:26 pm

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#2009 Postby grapealcoholic » Fri Oct 01, 2021 11:20 am

ADT is completely useless half the time. They need to discard that trash
1 likes   

User avatar
InfernoFlameCat
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2102
Age: 22
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2020 10:52 am
Location: Buford, GA

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#2010 Postby InfernoFlameCat » Fri Oct 01, 2021 11:20 am

Noooo recon dropped the dropsonde too early! They didn't drop it around peak winds!
0 likes   
I am by no means a professional. DO NOT look at my forecasts for official information or make decisions based on what I post.

Goal: to become a registered expert over tropical and subtropical cyclones.

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8812
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#2011 Postby aspen » Fri Oct 01, 2021 11:23 am

grapealcoholic wrote:ADT is completely useless half the time. They need to discard that trash

It may be performing poorly with Sam, but it’s not trash at all. It was actually spot-on with Ida’s peak intensity (130kt and low-930s as confirmed by recon) and functions well under most circumstances. Storms that give it a hard time are pinholes, annulars, ones that had their eyes collapse from EWRCs, and stuff at high latitudes like this.
6 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

User avatar
kevin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2554
Age: 26
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 4:35 am

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#2012 Postby kevin » Fri Oct 01, 2021 11:23 am

InfernoFlameCat wrote:Noooo recon dropped the dropsonde too early! They didn't drop it around peak winds!


However, the dropsonde does show a conversion rate of 132/142 = 93% of winds mixing down to the surface, which would give 152*93% = 141 kt for the peak winds. I think the dropsonde does an excellent job at confirming that winds are mixing down very well and that there's just something wrong with SFMR right now.
6 likes   

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8812
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#2013 Postby aspen » Fri Oct 01, 2021 11:27 am

Hopefully recon goes for a NW-SE pass…it’s a long flight back so there’s a non-zero chance they do just one pass.
0 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

User avatar
Hypercane_Kyle
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3344
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:58 pm
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#2014 Postby Hypercane_Kyle » Fri Oct 01, 2021 11:29 am

152 knot flight level winds. Be curious to see what the NHC makes of that! 135 knots would be my guess.

Dropsonde was 132 knots too on the surface. Sam is borderline Category 5!
0 likes   
My posts are my own personal opinion, defer to the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and other NOAA products for decision making during hurricane season.

User avatar
Iceresistance
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9279
Age: 21
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2020 9:45 am
Location: Tecumseh, OK/Norman, OK

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#2015 Postby Iceresistance » Fri Oct 01, 2021 11:38 am

I've seen farther Recon Missions (From Louisiana to Eta & Iota in the Caribbean) before
0 likes   
Bill 2015 & Beta 2020

Winter 2020-2021 :cold:

All observations are in Tecumseh, OK unless otherwise noted.

Winter posts are focused mainly for Oklahoma & Texas.

Take any of my forecasts with a grain of salt, refer to the NWS, SPC, and NHC for official information

Never say Never with weather! Because ANYTHING is possible!

User avatar
InfernoFlameCat
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2102
Age: 22
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2020 10:52 am
Location: Buford, GA

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#2016 Postby InfernoFlameCat » Fri Oct 01, 2021 11:39 am

Hypercane_Kyle wrote:152 knot flight level winds. Be curious to see what the NHC makes of that! 135 knots would be my guess.

Dropsonde was 132 knots too on the surface. Sam is borderline Category 5!

IMO Sam is Cat 5. They did not drop the dropsonde at peak winds but it did show a 93% conversion rate between fl and srfc winds.
1 likes   
I am by no means a professional. DO NOT look at my forecasts for official information or make decisions based on what I post.

Goal: to become a registered expert over tropical and subtropical cyclones.

User avatar
kevin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2554
Age: 26
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 4:35 am

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#2017 Postby kevin » Fri Oct 01, 2021 11:39 am

The need to go south anyways to get back home so I think they'll do at least one more NW to SE pass.
0 likes   

Sciencerocks
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8903
Age: 39
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:51 am

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#2018 Postby Sciencerocks » Fri Oct 01, 2021 11:39 am

I'd go with cat5.
1 likes   

User avatar
ElectricStorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5017
Age: 24
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#2019 Postby ElectricStorm » Fri Oct 01, 2021 11:40 am

InfernoFlameCat wrote:
Hypercane_Kyle wrote:152 knot flight level winds. Be curious to see what the NHC makes of that! 135 knots would be my guess.

Dropsonde was 132 knots too on the surface. Sam is borderline Category 5!

IMO Sam is Cat 5. They did not drop the dropsonde at peak winds but it did show a 93% conversion rate between fl and srfc winds.

Dropsonde are usually gusts. They never upgrade based on the drops. Also they're flying at 700 mb so the peak FL winds aren't going to show up in the dropsonde.
1 likes   
I am in no way a professional. Take what I say with a grain of salt as I could be totally wrong. Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.

Boomer Sooner!

User avatar
Iceresistance
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9279
Age: 21
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2020 9:45 am
Location: Tecumseh, OK/Norman, OK

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#2020 Postby Iceresistance » Fri Oct 01, 2021 11:44 am

I'm predicting 155 mph & 938 MB on Advisory 36A
0 likes   
Bill 2015 & Beta 2020

Winter 2020-2021 :cold:

All observations are in Tecumseh, OK unless otherwise noted.

Winter posts are focused mainly for Oklahoma & Texas.

Take any of my forecasts with a grain of salt, refer to the NWS, SPC, and NHC for official information

Never say Never with weather! Because ANYTHING is possible!


Return to “2021”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests