NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

Current storms and invests:

Moderators: hurricanetrack, S2k Moderators


The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
psyclone
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4801
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:04 pm
Location: palm harbor fl

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2001 Postby psyclone » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:17 pm

Most major hurricanes approach Jamaica from the ESE. With the mountainous island oriented that same direction, hurricanes frequently duck in a game of chicken with the island and miss... Gilbert being a very noteworthy exception. Now we have a hurricane pointed perpendicular at the island....making escape impossible. This is a remarkable event...not just the storm intensity but the direction of attack. this one will stand out on historical maps
4 likes   

User avatar
Hurricane2022
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1909
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2022 11:38 pm
Location: Araçatuba, Brazil

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2002 Postby Hurricane2022 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:17 pm

COLD AS HELL :froze:
Image
4 likes   
Sorry for the bad English sometimes...!
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.

--------

ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).

User avatar
eastcoastFL
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3996
Age: 43
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:29 pm
Location: Palm City, FL

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2003 Postby eastcoastFL » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:18 pm

0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Teban54
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3728
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 1:19 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2004 Postby Teban54 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:18 pm

aspen wrote:As if Melissa couldn’t get any more ludicrous, the eye looks to be warming and the CDG is thickening on Dvorak imagery. I’ll be very surprised if next pass doesn’t yield 898-900mb, or lower.

I find CyclonicWx (by Alex Boreham, aka NotSparta on S2K) to be pretty good at viewing the -80~90 C range with greater detail. What it's showing right now is straight up ridiculous.

Image
16 likes   

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15507
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2005 Postby NDG » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:19 pm

Weird how each intense Hurricane is different, it hasn't had an EWRC at all since it became a MH while others barely last a few hours to start their EWRCs.
2 likes   

Nuno
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 618
Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2019 8:35 am
Location: Coral Gables, FL

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2006 Postby Nuno » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:19 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:
wx98 wrote:
xtyphooncyclonex wrote:
Crazy how we have two "M" storms from two years in a row making the list. Guess the M curse is a thing


Weird that despite the “I” curse, there’s no I storms here and 3 M storms.


Strongest of the "I" storms was Ivan at 910 mb, followed by Irma at 914 mb.


Crazy that Irma wasn't lower in her lifespan. Was she just too large?
2 likes   
Andrew (1992), Irene (1999), Frances (2004), Katrina (2005), Wilma (2005), Fay (2008), Irma (2017), Eta (2020), Ian (2022)

HurricaneRyan
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 839
Age: 31
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2010 3:05 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2007 Postby HurricaneRyan » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:20 pm

When you realize that this will probably be landfalling tomorrow morning California time. :eek:
0 likes   
Kay '22 Hilary '23

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34286
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2008 Postby CrazyC83 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:20 pm

One thing that is scary: these -90C cloud top outer bands are hitting Jamaica and likely producing massive flooding and mudslides in the mountains...and will continue to do so...
5 likes   

User avatar
Teban54
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3728
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 1:19 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2009 Postby Teban54 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:21 pm

Nuno wrote:
CrazyC83 wrote:
wx98 wrote:
Weird that despite the “I” curse, there’s no I storms here and 3 M storms.


Strongest of the "I" storms was Ivan at 910 mb, followed by Irma at 914 mb.


Crazy that Irma wasn't lower in her lifespan. Was she just too large?

Higher background pressure in the open Atlantic, especially at an earlier time of the year, would be my guess.
4 likes   

User avatar
Teban54
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3728
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 1:19 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2010 Postby Teban54 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:21 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:One thing that is scary: these -90C cloud top outer bands are hitting Jamaica and likely producing massive flooding and mudslides in the mountains...and will continue to do so...

And when they stop doing so, it wouldn't be long before they're replaced with -90C CDO instead, or if you're lucky, a 150 kt eye.
2 likes   

User avatar
Hurricane2022
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1909
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2022 11:38 pm
Location: Araçatuba, Brazil

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2011 Postby Hurricane2022 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:22 pm

Did I hear someone saying "next pass"?? :roflmao:
Image
1 likes   
Sorry for the bad English sometimes...!
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.

--------

ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).

USTropics
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2727
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 3:45 am
Location: Florida State University

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2012 Postby USTropics » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:22 pm

REDHurricane wrote:Hurricane models have Melissa strengthening up until landfall -- if that holds true we maaaaaybe could get in the ballpark of Wilma. Maybe.


That's truly the scary part, the satellite presentation and environment are quite literally pristine. The only thing holding Melissa back from reaching MPI is herself basically (e.g., inner core changes, like EWRC). Theoretically, Melissa could push ~875mb if the stars aligned:

Image
8 likes   

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6227
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2013 Postby cheezyWXguy » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:22 pm

REDHurricane wrote:Hurricane models have Melissa strengthening up until landfall -- if that holds true we maaaaaybe could get in the ballpark of Wilma. Maybe.

Shaving off another 20mb could be a stretch, though I suppose it’s not impossible. Rivaling Allen’s wind speed record is also a tall order but seems more achievable to me if it can mix those winds aloft down a bit more efficiently.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34286
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2014 Postby CrazyC83 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:23 pm

Hurricane2022 wrote:Did I hear someone saying "next pass"?? :roflmao:
https://i.imgur.com/XEM9g60.png


It has to move around Jamaica. It won't fly over it due to the mountains unless at cruising altitude.
1 likes   

wx98
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1396
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2018 9:24 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2015 Postby wx98 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:23 pm

Nuno wrote:
CrazyC83 wrote:
wx98 wrote:
Weird that despite the “I” curse, there’s no I storms here and 3 M storms.


Strongest of the "I" storms was Ivan at 910 mb, followed by Irma at 914 mb.


Crazy that Irma wasn't lower in her lifespan. Was she just too large?


Probably higher background pressure in the Atlantic making it harder to get lower (but low relative to the surrounding environment).
1 likes   

User avatar
mrbagyo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3875
Age: 33
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 9:18 am
Location: 14.13N 120.98E
Contact:

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2016 Postby mrbagyo » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:25 pm

Image
Image

As good as it gets but ill still give the crown to Haiyan in terms of savage appearance (its pretty close)
11 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to RSMC, NHC and NWS products.

dukeblue219
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 556
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2016 3:52 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2017 Postby dukeblue219 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:25 pm

Hurricane2022 wrote:Did I hear someone saying "next pass"?? :roflmao:
https://i.imgur.com/XEM9g60.png


The plane didn't turn around, if that's what you're suggesting. There's something weird in the very last data point so the plane looked stationary to the plotting app, which must have defaulted to pointing Eastward.
3 likes   

drewschmaltz
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 351
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2015 8:19 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2018 Postby drewschmaltz » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:26 pm

I just learned a bit about mountain "prominence" while hiking mt rainer. Though it's not the tallest in the lower 48, it has by far the most prominence. Is such a record kept for hurricanes? Their mb differential?
1 likes   
I HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT. PLEASE CONSULT SOMEONE WHO DOES. START WITH THE NHC. ALL POSTS ARE FOR ENTERTAINMENT PURPOSES ONLY.

User avatar
ElectricStorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5121
Age: 24
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2019 Postby ElectricStorm » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:26 pm

Hurricane2022 wrote:Did I hear someone saying "next pass"?? :roflmao:
https://i.imgur.com/XEM9g60.png

I think that's just a TT error, it says bearing 90 degrees at 0kts. This happened with last night's mission a couple times as well.
3 likes   
B.S Meteorology, University of Oklahoma '25

Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.

User avatar
Hurrilurker
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 738
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 3:32 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2020 Postby Hurrilurker » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:27 pm

aspen wrote:The CDO is getting even smoother on recent meso floater frames. This is really pushing what is physically possible for an Atlantic storm.

I’m praying enough people in Jamaica have realized how bad this is and have taken all the necessary precautions, because I don’t like how public officials were downplaying Melissa’s threats a few days ago. Bad communication in a situation like this could lead to a devastating loss of life.

Even if they pack the shelters with tons of people, I'm starting to worry that structurally they may not be up to the task of this kind of storm intensity, like we're almost in 5+ territory. I guess the good news is it looks like Kingston will be spared a direct hit from the worst of the storm, if I were on the island I would head as far east as possible (though not on the coast).
2 likes   


Return to “Active Storms/Invests - Atlantic/EastPAC/CentralPAC/MED”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cdenton12 and 96 guests