WeatherGuesser wrote:4 at landfall?
More?
Less?
4 or 5 seems most likely at landfall.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
supercane4867 wrote:Kingarabian wrote:CrazyC83 wrote:It's growing larger in size too.
I hate to make the comparison...but how does the environment compare to Haiyan?
Haiyan was a freak that had many variables line up in its favor.
Maybe Rick 2009 is a better (unfortunately as well) comparison?
The rate of intensification is comparable to Linda which both happened in strong El nino year. Although I doubt satellite estimate will be as high as Linda since they are more conservative nowadays
supercane4867 wrote:[img]http://i.imgur.com/QaoCJ9H.gif[img]
[img]http://i.imgur.com/A5N77S8.gif[img]
CrazyC83 wrote:I wouldn't be surprised to see a Cat 5 out of this by late tonight.
Kingarabian wrote:Not sure if CDO thickness is the same but this almost @ Rick's peak when one compares these IR images:
Alyono wrote:probably 120 kts, maybe 125 kts. I'd wait for the recon to go crazy with the intensity
supercane4867 wrote:Kingarabian wrote:Not sure if CDO thickness is the same but this almost @ Rick's peak when one compares these IR images:
That IR imagery of Rick has a cold bias. This is Rick at peak intensity from GOES-12
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests