NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

Current storms and invests:

Moderators: hurricanetrack, S2k Moderators


The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
dukeblue219
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 556
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2016 3:52 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2701 Postby dukeblue219 » Tue Oct 28, 2025 4:11 pm

NOAA2 crossing over Cuba now
0 likes   

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9026
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2702 Postby aspen » Tue Oct 28, 2025 4:12 pm

ljmac75 wrote:
zzzh wrote:
It should be noted that while Melissa's landfall intensity
is among the strongest ever recorded in the Atlantic basin,
it will take extensive post-analysis to determine exactly
where it ranks among landfalling Atlantic hurricanes.

Too late, the relevant Wikipedia lists have already been adjusted.
In all seriousness, I hope someone somewhere got a pressure reading in the eye.

I think Josh getting a reading on the eastern eyewall should be enough. We can then use the pressure gradient from recon just a few hours prior to work backwards and find the central pressure at landfall with whatever Josh got.
2 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

User avatar
TeamPlayersBlue
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3459
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 1:44 am
Location: Denver/Applewood, CO

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2703 Postby TeamPlayersBlue » Tue Oct 28, 2025 4:12 pm

Amazes me when storms IMMEDIATELY cross back over water, they begin to show signs of life again.
4 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11989
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2704 Postby GCANE » Tue Oct 28, 2025 4:17 pm

Got to hand it to Lockheed.
They build planes that take a beating and keep on ticking.
3 likes   

User avatar
Hurricane2022
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1909
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2022 11:38 pm
Location: Araçatuba, Brazil

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2705 Postby Hurricane2022 » Tue Oct 28, 2025 4:18 pm

2 likes   
Sorry for the bad English sometimes...!
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.

--------

ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11989
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2706 Postby GCANE » Tue Oct 28, 2025 4:20 pm

0 likes   

User avatar
syfr
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 223
Age: 106
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2012 7:33 pm
Location: East Central NC

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2707 Postby syfr » Tue Oct 28, 2025 4:22 pm

Still looks in good shape.

It'll be interesting to see what the data shows it to be in the next recon pass.
1 likes   
I'm not a meteorologist, I'm an electronics engineer. While I can probably fix your toaster oven, you're not going to learn about storms from me!

New Mexico had no hurricanes. Then I moved to NC right before Fran.....

MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 490
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2020 1:43 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2708 Postby MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS » Tue Oct 28, 2025 4:25 pm

GCANE wrote:I dunno. 355K PV is still in the clear over a wide area.
Still has the setup for upshear vortex precession.
Over very warm and deep water.

Has all the necessary components except for time.
1 likes   
Emily '87, Felix '95, Gert '99, Fabian '03, Humberto '19, Paulette '20, Teddy '20, Fiona '22, Lee '23, Ernesto '24, Humberto/Imelda '25

MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 490
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2020 1:43 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2709 Postby MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS » Tue Oct 28, 2025 4:27 pm

rwfromkansas wrote:they should have stayed until landfall.


Easy there, hotshot. Those g-force limits are for their safety.
4 likes   
Emily '87, Felix '95, Gert '99, Fabian '03, Humberto '19, Paulette '20, Teddy '20, Fiona '22, Lee '23, Ernesto '24, Humberto/Imelda '25

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5439
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2710 Postby Nimbus » Tue Oct 28, 2025 4:32 pm

tallywx wrote:
Ed_2001 wrote:
Nimbus wrote:

38 with 58 at the airport now

28 05:00 E 38 G 54 0.00 Heavy Rain and Windy BKN010 OVC045 77 75.2 94% 78 0 0.0


Then that anemometer is collecting faulty or outdated data. I mean just check out the video tweet to your top.


Timestamp 05:00 local? That was 9 hours ago!


Montego Bay, Saint James, Jamaica Weather Conditions just updated 87 mph from the NW
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10384
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2711 Postby Sanibel » Tue Oct 28, 2025 4:54 pm

Correction: Eye exited Salt Marsh, Jamaica...

Hard eyewall probably exited over Falmouth, Jamaica on its way back over water...
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurrilurker
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 738
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 3:32 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2712 Postby Hurrilurker » Tue Oct 28, 2025 4:54 pm

It's a mess (and disaster) but honestly it could have been a lot worse. If it was going to hit Jamaica, that looks like about the best possible path it could have taken for minimal population impacts.
1 likes   

User avatar
StormWeather
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 454
Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2024 2:34 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2713 Postby StormWeather » Tue Oct 28, 2025 4:56 pm

Anyone know what happened to Mission 26? They did a U-turn and went back to the island they took off from.
0 likes   
Just an average cyclone tracker

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

TomballEd
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1066
Age: 61
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2023 4:52 pm
Location: Spring/Klein area, not Tomball

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2714 Postby TomballEd » Tue Oct 28, 2025 4:56 pm

GCANE wrote:Got to hand it to Lockheed.
They build planes that take a beating and keep on ticking.



They get overhauled every few years and are out of service for the better part of a year (I saw something on Discovery) but the planes are 50 years old. The Navy is phasing out the last of the Orion subhunters in favor the P8 Poseidon (both the Orion and Poseidon are modified civilian aircraft, the Lockheed Electra and the B-737)). NOAA is going to have to start training its own Orion pilots with the Navy retiring the plane.

The WC-130J just looks sturdier to me.
1 likes   

dukeblue219
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 556
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2016 3:52 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2715 Postby dukeblue219 » Tue Oct 28, 2025 4:57 pm

Hurrilurker wrote:It's a mess (and disaster) but honestly it could have been a lot worse. If it was going to hit Jamaica, that looks like about the best possible path it could have taken for minimal population impacts.

It's really hard to tell the day-of, though. Katrina felt the same way - "it's weakening," "it missed New Orleans to the East," "the levees appear to be holding," etc.
9 likes   

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11989
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2716 Postby GCANE » Tue Oct 28, 2025 5:10 pm

TomballEd wrote:
GCANE wrote:Got to hand it to Lockheed.
They build planes that take a beating and keep on ticking.



They get overhauled every few years and are out of service for the better part of a year (I saw something on Discovery) but the planes are 50 years old. The Navy is phasing out the last of the Orion subhunters in favor the P8 Poseidon (both the Orion and Poseidon are modified civilian aircraft, the Lockheed Electra and the B-737)). NOAA is going to have to start training its own Orion pilots with the Navy retiring the plane.

The WC-130J just looks sturdier to me.


C130 is awesome. I was a Flight Test Engineer for Lockheed in my earlier years. Flew on the X130 many times and did many crazy things. X130 was a modified C130 designed for VSTOL. Flew tree top levels in the Smokies and did sonobuoy drops at Pax River. Luckily I got out just before it crashed and burned in Marietta,
1 likes   

User avatar
Teban54
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3727
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 1:19 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2717 Postby Teban54 » Tue Oct 28, 2025 5:11 pm

dukeblue219 wrote:
Hurrilurker wrote:It's a mess (and disaster) but honestly it could have been a lot worse. If it was going to hit Jamaica, that looks like about the best possible path it could have taken for minimal population impacts.

It's really hard to tell the day-of, though. Katrina felt the same way - "it's weakening," "it missed New Orleans to the East," "the levees appear to be holding," etc.

Same for Helene. Initial comments after the landfall focused on the Big Bend area itself, which, despite enduring a Cat 4 landfall, was seen as "good luck" by FL landfall standards due to lower population. Even the surge in the Tampa Bay area only caught attention a few hours later. The flooding and destruction much further inland, which eventually became the most well-known impacts of Helene, only started dominating the discussions a day or so after landfall.

As for Melissa, inland flooding already seems to be a theme, even in areas far from the eyewall.
5 likes   

User avatar
Kazmit
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2250
Age: 22
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2016 8:49 am
Location: Bermuda

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2718 Postby Kazmit » Tue Oct 28, 2025 5:12 pm

Didn’t have time to post these earlier. Peak intensity/landfall.

Image
Image
Last edited by Kazmit on Tue Oct 28, 2025 8:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
7 likes   
Igor 2010, Sandy 2012, Fay 2014, Gonzalo 2014, Joaquin 2015, Nicole 2016, Humberto 2019, Imelda 2025

I am only a tropical weather enthusiast. My predictions are not official and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Teban54
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3727
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 1:19 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2719 Postby Teban54 » Tue Oct 28, 2025 5:13 pm

Landfall, weakening, and (possible) recovery:
Image
3 likes   

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11989
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2720 Postby GCANE » Tue Oct 28, 2025 5:14 pm

What happened to AF301?
0 likes   


Return to “Active Storms/Invests - Atlantic/EastPAC/CentralPAC/MED”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 117 guests