SW Pacific: Severe TC Larry (Ex TD 15)

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
P.K.
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 5149
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 5:57 pm
Location: Watford, England
Contact:

#281 Postby P.K. » Wed Mar 22, 2006 9:40 am

HURAKAN wrote:For norhtern hurricanes the stronger part is usually the NE. So, for a southern cyclone the stronger part is the SE?


The eyewall went over Innisfail but how are we to know if the strongest part went over though? Spatial measurements on the BoM website are rather far apart, especialy when you compare it to all the readings you get for North Atlantic storms from recon. Given the movement here would the SW quad not have been the strongest?
0 likes   

JonathanBelles
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 11430
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 9:00 pm
Location: School: Florida State University (Tallahassee, FL) Home: St. Petersburg, Florida
Contact:

#282 Postby JonathanBelles » Wed Mar 22, 2006 2:48 pm

coul dit redevelop off the west coast of austrailia or possibly even combine with TC Floyd
0 likes   

User avatar
P.K.
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 5149
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 5:57 pm
Location: Watford, England
Contact:

#283 Postby P.K. » Wed Mar 22, 2006 3:01 pm

There is a good 2000km between the remnants of Larry and TC Floyd so no.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#284 Postby HURAKAN » Wed Mar 22, 2006 6:47 pm

http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/speci ... visir.html

A loop of Larry's entire life. A really cool loop presented by CIMSS.
0 likes   

Jim Cantore

#285 Postby Jim Cantore » Wed Mar 22, 2006 8:33 pm

AussieMark wrote:Image

Image

Image

Image

Image


My god, thats some extreme stuff

I dont know how surge prone that area that is but that looks like wind damage so I'd think that would be caused by winds at 150-175mph

Imagine of a storm that strong to hit NOLA, Houston, Miami, Savanah, or Tampa :eek:
0 likes   

User avatar
artist
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9792
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 3:26 pm
Location: West Palm

#286 Postby artist » Wed Mar 22, 2006 8:38 pm

looks as though those roofs weren't strapped down.
0 likes   

Jim Cantore

#287 Postby Jim Cantore » Wed Mar 22, 2006 8:50 pm

I've heard about a billion in damage and no reported deaths, I also read on wiki, "Unknown strength cyclone"
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

#288 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Wed Mar 22, 2006 9:00 pm

130 to 135 mph with 150 mph gust I would guest.
0 likes   

Jim Cantore

#289 Postby Jim Cantore » Wed Mar 22, 2006 9:06 pm

Wind damage like that I'll say 135-145 sustained with gusts to 165
0 likes   

Jim Cantore

#290 Postby Jim Cantore » Wed Mar 22, 2006 9:10 pm

I'm looking at the satelitte loop, it looks like an ERC might have begun as it was making landfall, just a guess
0 likes   

User avatar
AussieMark
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5858
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 6:36 pm
Location: near Sydney, Australia

#291 Postby AussieMark » Sun Mar 26, 2006 6:19 am

Cyclone Larry was one of the most intense – and least expected – weather events in Australian history. At first it was simply a low pressure system, but conditions coalesced and it intensified almost overnight into a category five cyclone.

“There was a favourable environment with a ridge to the south that helped keep it on a westerly trajectory,” says Ben Matson, meteorologist and founder of independent weather company SwellNet. “The surface temperature in the Coral Sea was also good and there was nothing to slow it down. It was a very special weather event.”

Although this is peak cyclone season, often a pressure ridge along the Queensland coast creates windshear in the upper atmosphere. This acts to slice the low pressure system in half and the embryonic cyclone is dead before it gets underway.

With Larry, the ridge wasn’t there, and there was nothing to slow it down. The pressure dropped to 915 hecto-pascals and peak wind gusts hit 215kmh. In layman’s terms, it was a very low-pressure system with very high winds.

But it wasn’t just the local conditions. The broader atmospheric signs were also favourable for Larry’s formation, and point to more heavy-duty cyclones before the season closes at the end of April. Larry was the offspring of a phenomenon called Madden-Julian Oscillation, a global, eastward-moving pattern of upper and lower air circulation that operates over a 30- to 60-day cycle.

“It enhances convection in the region and helps spawn tropical lows,” says Matson. The oscillation was in the ideal part of its cycle to help kickstart the convection needed to sustain a cyclone.

Cyclones need a sea surface temperature of at least 27.5°C to get going. Hot air rises, taking moisture with it. A low-pressure system and relatively light winds aloft help its formation, and the Earth’s rotation adds the spin. As long as the energy keeps pouring in, the cyclone keeps going. Fortunately, as soon as it crosses land – as Larry did on Monday – the heat source dries up and the cyclone withers into a tropical depression.

We’re in the middle of the season, the Madden-Julian Oscillation is favourable and the ocean is warm, so more cyclones are inevitable, but another of Larry’s intensity is hard to forecast. The perfect storm requires perfect conditions.
0 likes   

User avatar
P.K.
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 5149
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 5:57 pm
Location: Watford, England
Contact:

#292 Postby P.K. » Fri Mar 31, 2006 4:32 am

http://www.bom.gov.au/weather/qld/cyclone/tc_larry/

That 108kt sustained wind is not included, so it must have been removed.

Maximum Reported Wind Gusts
Low Isles 41 knots / 76 km/h at 9:00am 20 March 2006
Green Island 59 knots / 109 km/h at 7:04am 20 March 2006
Cairns Airport 53 knots / 98 km/h at 7:42am 20 March 2006
Mareeba 55 knots / 102 km/h at 9:00am 20 March 2006
South Johnstone 98 knots / 181 km/h at 6:33am and 6:38am 20 March 2006
Lucinda 54 knots / 100 km/h at 4:00am 20 March 2006

Maximum Sustained Winds
Low Isles 37 knots / 68 km/h at 9:00am 20 March 2006
Green Island 46 knots / 85 km/h at 7:04am 20 March 2006
Cairns Airport 29 knots / 54 km/h at 7:42am
Mareeba 40 knots / 74 km/h at 9:00am 20 March 2006
South Johnstone 48 knots / 89 km/h at 6:50am 20 March 2006
Flinders Reef 79 knots / 146 km/h at 8:00pm and 9:00pm 19 March 2006
Cardwell 47 knots / 87 km/h at 6:00am and 9:00am 20 March 2006
Lucinda 44 knots / 81 km/h at 4:00am 20 March 2006


The estimated minimum central pressure has also been increased to near 940hPa.
0 likes   

User avatar
Weatherfreak14
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1383
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2005 3:40 pm
Location: Beaufort, SC
Contact:

#293 Postby Weatherfreak14 » Fri Mar 31, 2006 8:27 am

Those pics are amazintg. Hope the guy isnt't planning to cook.
0 likes   

HurricaneBill
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: East Longmeadow, MA, USA

#294 Postby HurricaneBill » Fri Mar 31, 2006 10:34 pm

So Larry got downgraded from a Category 5 to a 4?
0 likes   

User avatar
P.K.
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 5149
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 5:57 pm
Location: Watford, England
Contact:

#295 Postby P.K. » Sat Apr 01, 2006 4:35 am

Looks like it, I've e-mailed them to ask about the Innisfail reading.
0 likes   

Squeako da Magnifico
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 26
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 4:54 am
Location: Australia, QLD, Caboolture 45km north of Brisbane

#296 Postby Squeako da Magnifico » Sat Apr 01, 2006 5:26 am

They showed a documentary of Larry tonight. They said they are still assessing the damage. Because due to limited funding of the Bureau. They just don't know how fast the winds were or what pressure. It was only an approximation first off. But they say that Larry was a Strong Catergory 4.
0 likes   

HurricaneBill
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: East Longmeadow, MA, USA

#297 Postby HurricaneBill » Sat Apr 01, 2006 7:07 pm

Well, I'll admit Larry was at the threshold. So it could go either way.

But regardless, I think Larry's already made his mark.
0 likes   

User avatar
NONAME
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 373
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2006 8:15 am
Location: Where the Wind Blows

#298 Postby NONAME » Sat Apr 01, 2006 7:22 pm

his gust were 180mph
0 likes   

User avatar
P.K.
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 5149
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 5:57 pm
Location: Watford, England
Contact:

#299 Postby P.K. » Wed Apr 05, 2006 4:17 am

Turns out the Innisfail reading was purely an estimate using the Beaufort scale. It should be included in the report in some form at some point though.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: chris_fit, Cpv17 and 59 guests