NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

Current storms and invests:

Moderators: hurricanetrack, S2k Moderators


The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
kevin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2874
Age: 27
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 4:35 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2921 Postby kevin » Thu Oct 30, 2025 6:39 am



That's some insane footage for not being during 'peak' winds. The more footage I see of Melissa during landfall and the damage afterwards, the more I'm convinced that it tied or surpassed Allen as the strongest landfall in the Atlantic in terms of wind speed. An upgrade to 165 - 170 kt in post-season analysis is definitely on the table imo.
3 likes   

User avatar
storm_in_a_teacup
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 488
Age: 33
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2017 5:01 pm
Location: Huntsville, Alabama (originally from Houston)
Contact:

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2922 Postby storm_in_a_teacup » Thu Oct 30, 2025 7:01 am



AAAAAGH!
I find these so unsettling to watch…they look…wrong to me. Almost alive and writhing in there.
This is also how I felt seeing the eyewall mesovortices of Harvey…which is why when I drew him making landfall I significantly toned them down
4 likes   
I know I can't straddle the atmosphere...just a tiny storm in your teacup, girl.

User avatar
AnnularCane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2945
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 9:18 am
Location: Wytheville, VA

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2923 Postby AnnularCane » Thu Oct 30, 2025 7:49 am

storm_in_a_teacup wrote:


AAAAAGH!
I find these so unsettling to watch…they look…wrong to me. Almost alive and writhing in there.
This is also how I felt seeing the eyewall mesovortices of Harvey…which is why when I drew him making landfall I significantly toned them down



I think it looks like the inside of a washing machine. :lol:
0 likes   
"But it never rained rain. It never snowed snow. And it never blew just wind. It rained things like soup and juice. It snowed mashed potatoes and green peas. And sometimes the wind blew in storms of hamburgers." -- Judi Barrett, Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 12013
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2924 Postby GCANE » Thu Oct 30, 2025 7:55 am

1 likes   

User avatar
Teban54
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3735
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 1:19 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2925 Postby Teban54 » Thu Oct 30, 2025 8:12 am

Trying to close off a full eyewall again:

Image
1 likes   

User avatar
Kazmit
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2256
Age: 22
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2016 8:49 am
Location: Bermuda

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2926 Postby Kazmit » Thu Oct 30, 2025 8:40 am

Definitely a MH again- don't know why the NHC didn't upgrade it at 8am.
2 likes   
Igor 2010, Sandy 2012, Fay 2014, Gonzalo 2014, Joaquin 2015, Nicole 2016, Humberto 2019, Imelda 2025

I am only a tropical weather enthusiast. My predictions are not official and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 496
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2020 1:43 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2927 Postby MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS » Thu Oct 30, 2025 8:49 am

Well-defined eye, definitely a category 3 now which is restrengthening as most of the models predicted. Will pass to the northwest of Bermuda, but strongest winds are in the southeastern quadrant. Most models still keep the strongest winds offshore but not as far offshore as the center. There is a small chance we could see Cat 3 winds on the island.
3 likes   
Emily '87, Felix '95, Gert '99, Fabian '03, Humberto '19, Paulette '20, Teddy '20, Fiona '22, Lee '23, Ernesto '24, Humberto/Imelda '25

User avatar
sasha_B
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 253
Age: 24
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2024 4:32 pm
Location: Charleston, SC

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2928 Postby sasha_B » Thu Oct 30, 2025 9:16 am

2025OCT30 134020 6.2 932.2 119.8 5.4 5.8 7.0 0.5T/hour ON FLG OFF OFF 3.25 -74.04 EYE 11 IR 40.7 27.26 71.90 ARCHER GOES19 32.0


Melissa truly refuses to give up. The eye was already beginning to clear out between 06z and 09z this morning; if she wasn't a Category 3 then, it seems very probable that she is now.
5 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20153
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2929 Postby tolakram » Thu Oct 30, 2025 9:21 am

Kazmit wrote:Definitely a MH again- don't know why the NHC didn't upgrade it at 8am.


Email them and ask.
2 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 12013
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2930 Postby GCANE » Thu Oct 30, 2025 9:41 am

CDO has done a complete 360-dgree wrap around with ragged eye formed.
If this isn't a major, I don't know what is.
4 likes   

MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 496
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2020 1:43 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2931 Postby MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS » Thu Oct 30, 2025 9:48 am

I expect they'll go 100 kts/960mbar at the update shortly
0 likes   
Emily '87, Felix '95, Gert '99, Fabian '03, Humberto '19, Paulette '20, Teddy '20, Fiona '22, Lee '23, Ernesto '24, Humberto/Imelda '25

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 148325
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2932 Postby cycloneye » Thu Oct 30, 2025 9:53 am

MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS wrote:I expect they'll go 100 kts/960mbar at the update shortly


Not up there.

1500 UTC THU OCT 30 2025

HURRICANE CENTER LOCATED NEAR 27.8N 71.7W AT 30/1500Z
POSITION ACCURATE WITHIN 30 NM

PRESENT MOVEMENT TOWARD THE NORTH-NORTHEAST OR 30 DEGREES AT 21 KT

ESTIMATED MINIMUM CENTRAL PRESSURE 965 MB
MAX SUSTAINED WINDS 90 KT WITH GUSTS TO 110 KT.
64 KT....... 45NE 65SE 30SW 20NW.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
InfernoFlameCat
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2127
Age: 22
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2020 10:52 am
Location: Buford, GA

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2933 Postby InfernoFlameCat » Thu Oct 30, 2025 9:53 am

They kept it at 90 knots…
0 likes   
I am by no means a professional. DO NOT look at my forecasts for official information or make decisions based on what I post.

Goal: to become a registered expert over tropical and subtropical cyclones.

User avatar
sasha_B
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 253
Age: 24
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2024 4:32 pm
Location: Charleston, SC

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2934 Postby sasha_B » Thu Oct 30, 2025 9:58 am

InfernoFlameCat wrote:They kept it at 90 knots…


There'll be an explanation in the discussion, but it's possible that they're excluding the ADT estimates due to how consistently high they've been running, and without more recent recon obs. or a subjective fix at T5.5 or higher (it was T4.0 at 12z), they don't consider the data sufficient to justify any upgrades.
0 likes   

User avatar
Kazmit
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2256
Age: 22
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2016 8:49 am
Location: Bermuda

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2935 Postby Kazmit » Thu Oct 30, 2025 9:59 am

How do 113 kt flight-level winds translate to 90 kts at the surface? Not to mention the improved satellite appearance since the plane left.
2 likes   
Igor 2010, Sandy 2012, Fay 2014, Gonzalo 2014, Joaquin 2015, Nicole 2016, Humberto 2019, Imelda 2025

I am only a tropical weather enthusiast. My predictions are not official and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Teban54
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3735
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 1:19 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2936 Postby Teban54 » Thu Oct 30, 2025 10:50 am

Ironically, Melissa's appearance started degrading immediately after the advisory.

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9029
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2937 Postby aspen » Thu Oct 30, 2025 10:58 am

Kazmit wrote:How do 113 kt flight-level winds translate to 90 kts at the surface? Not to mention the improved satellite appearance since the plane left.

Recurving, somewhat disheveled systems influenced by a trough like this tend to have worse FL-to-surface conversion rates. I remember something similar with either Humberto ‘19 or Isaias ‘20.
5 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

User avatar
Kazmit
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2256
Age: 22
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2016 8:49 am
Location: Bermuda

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2938 Postby Kazmit » Thu Oct 30, 2025 11:40 am

aspen wrote:
Kazmit wrote:How do 113 kt flight-level winds translate to 90 kts at the surface? Not to mention the improved satellite appearance since the plane left.

Recurving, somewhat disheveled systems influenced by a trough like this tend to have worse FL-to-surface conversion rates. I remember something similar with either Humberto ‘19 or Isaias ‘20.

Humberto ‘19 actually developed a sting jet that made it more powerful than it otherwise would have been.
0 likes   
Igor 2010, Sandy 2012, Fay 2014, Gonzalo 2014, Joaquin 2015, Nicole 2016, Humberto 2019, Imelda 2025

I am only a tropical weather enthusiast. My predictions are not official and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5442
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2939 Postby Nimbus » Thu Oct 30, 2025 12:32 pm

aspen wrote:
Kazmit wrote:How do 113 kt flight-level winds translate to 90 kts at the surface? Not to mention the improved satellite appearance since the plane left.

Recurving, somewhat disheveled systems influenced by a trough like this tend to have worse FL-to-surface conversion rates. I remember something similar with either Humberto ‘19 or Isaias ‘20.


Starting to get a little drier air undercutting the circulation but hasn't brought the flight level winds down as much as I thought it would. I was thinking Bermuda might see 75 knot winds at the most by landfall.



Image
0 likes   

LarryWx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6843
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 2:04 pm
Location: GA

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2940 Postby LarryWx » Thu Oct 30, 2025 12:37 pm

For anyone interested, here’s an updated stormchaser Jeff P. (with his host) livestream link from Ground Zero. This is from decimated Black River on the coast. Jeff was just saying they need helicopters there ASAP because there are a whole lot of folks who are injured and need to be airlifted to a hospital.
Edit: He just quoted a Reuters reports saying this is a “humanitarian crisis”:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=eXN7D6JdSPI
Last edited by LarryWx on Thu Oct 30, 2025 12:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.


Return to “Active Storms/Invests - Atlantic/EastPAC/CentralPAC/MED”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 120 guests