Hurricane Dean Recon Discussion
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
- WindRunner
- Category 5
- Posts: 5806
- Age: 34
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
- Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
- Contact:
I'd say it's the radii of an oval-shaped partially-open eyewall within our brand-new eyewall, but the 40 would imply that the inner and outer eyewalls cross . . . and I don't think that's right . . .
Possibly just that there are weaker, partial eyewalls with radii of 8, 10, and 40nmi in addition to the main one at a 25nmi radius . . .
Possibly just that there are weaker, partial eyewalls with radii of 8, 10, and 40nmi in addition to the main one at a 25nmi radius . . .
0 likes
Re: Hurricane Dean Recon Discussion
My guess is that it's elongated with the longest axis along 40 degrees, longest axis 10 nm and shortest axis 8 nm.
0 likes
- WindRunner
- Category 5
- Posts: 5806
- Age: 34
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
- Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
- Contact:
Re: Hurricane Dean Recon Discussion
superfly wrote:My guess is that it's elongated with the longest axis along 40 degrees, longest axis 10 nm and shortest axis 8 nm.
Aaah, I think you've got it there . . . it does say 040, not O40, so that sounds right to me . . .
0 likes
- senorpepr
- Military Met/Moderator
- Posts: 12542
- Age: 43
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
- Location: Mackenbach, Germany
- Contact:
Re: Hurricane Dean Recon Discussion
superfly wrote:My guess is that it's elongated with the longest axis along 40 degrees, longest axis 10 nm and shortest axis 8 nm.
That would be correct.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 1131
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:53 pm
Re: Hurricane Dean Recon Discussion
senorpepr wrote:miamicanes177 wrote:M. CO
What does this stand for in the VDM?
Concentric eyewalls... essentially two (or more) eyewalls surrounding the eye.
Thanks...last question: what about M. C25?
0 likes
- mf_dolphin
- Category 5
- Posts: 17758
- Age: 68
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 2:05 pm
- Location: St Petersburg, FL
- Contact:
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 1131
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:53 pm
Re: Hurricane Dean Recon Discussion
mf_dolphin does this mean there are no concentric eyewalls now? thanks
0 likes
- senorpepr
- Military Met/Moderator
- Posts: 12542
- Age: 43
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
- Location: Mackenbach, Germany
- Contact:
Re: Hurricane Dean Recon Discussion
miamicanes177 wrote:mf_dolphin does this mean there are no concentric eyewalls now? thanks
What it means is that the main, outer eyewall is the circular, 25nm ring. The inner eyewall is now falling apart and is elliptical. It's long axis is from 040° through 220°. The long axis is 10nm while the short axis is 8nm.
0 likes
-
- Admin
- Posts: 20020
- Age: 62
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
- Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)
Re: Hurricane Dean Recon Discussion
Using the .85 that Derek thinks is about right for this storm that would be 137mph at the surface.
0 likes
Re: Hurricane Dean Recon Discussion
141kts max on the NW Quad, supports about 127kts on the surface. There may be higher winds in NE Quad.
The plane just made a eye pass as well. VDM shortly.
The plane just made a eye pass as well. VDM shortly.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 5077
- Age: 42
- Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 11:06 pm
- Location: Tampa, Florida, USA
- Contact:
The reduction factor was 89.7% about two minutes before the highest peak 10 second flight level wind was recorded, so I think you could use the normal 90% for this storm now.
I added a function to my recon decoder last night that calculates the approximate reduction factor.
It is done as follows:
"SFMR Peak (10s Avg.) Sfc. Wind" is divided by the "Peak (10 sec. Avg.) Flight Level Wind" and multiplied by 100
The SFMR surface wind data was suspect at the time the highest observation took place.
And it took place at the 700 mb pressure level.
I added a function to my recon decoder last night that calculates the approximate reduction factor.
It is done as follows:
"SFMR Peak (10s Avg.) Sfc. Wind" is divided by the "Peak (10 sec. Avg.) Flight Level Wind" and multiplied by 100
The SFMR surface wind data was suspect at the time the highest observation took place.
And it took place at the 700 mb pressure level.
0 likes
-
- Admin
- Posts: 20020
- Age: 62
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
- Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)
Re: Hurricane Dean Recon Discussion
145mph winds with a .9 reduction,
138mph with a .85 reduction
Cat 4 either way, but he looks to be getting more organized.
The bastard.
138mph with a .85 reduction
Cat 4 either way, but he looks to be getting more organized.

0 likes
Re: Hurricane Dean Recon Discussion
Still 125kts on the vortex message, I have to assume they'll up that before they're done with this flight.
0 likes
- x-y-no
- Category 5
- Posts: 8359
- Age: 65
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
- Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Re: Hurricane Dean Recon Discussion
141000 1706N 07437W 6954 02849 9681 +086 +086 137119 132 117 007 01
141030 1707N 07436W 6979 02853 9990 +066 +999 139141 145 111 028 01
141100 1708N 07435W 6975 02882 9990 +059 +999 132131 134 103 029 01
141030 1707N 07436W 6979 02853 9990 +066 +999 139141 145 111 028 01
141100 1708N 07435W 6975 02882 9990 +059 +999 132131 134 103 029 01
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Sunnydays, wileytheartist and 37 guests