ATL: MATTHEW - Models
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models
blp wrote:Much more ridging now. How can this escape at this point? Also seems slower timeframe wise.. The more it keeps slowing down the time frame the greater possibility of a trap scenario.
It can escape because the ridge will weaken but it is going to be at least a close call to NC if not an actual scrape/hit.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models
SouthFLTropics wrote:Much more SW at 144...the Midwest cold front can't dig fast enough. It better hurry or South Carolina is in play.
My thoughts too!
0 likes
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models
MASSIVE west shift by the UKMET
HURRICANE MATTHEW ANALYSED POSITION : 13.8N 70.5W
ATCF IDENTIFIER : AL142016
LEAD CENTRAL MAXIMUM WIND
VERIFYING TIME TIME POSITION PRESSURE (MB) SPEED (KNOTS)
-------------- ---- -------- ------------- -------------
1200UTC 30.09.2016 0 13.8N 70.5W 991 61
0000UTC 01.10.2016 12 13.2N 72.2W 993 50
1200UTC 01.10.2016 24 12.8N 73.9W 994 50
0000UTC 02.10.2016 36 12.9N 74.6W 993 45
1200UTC 02.10.2016 48 13.6N 75.9W 990 49
0000UTC 03.10.2016 60 15.0N 77.1W 983 58
1200UTC 03.10.2016 72 16.5N 77.0W 978 60
0000UTC 04.10.2016 84 18.3N 76.6W 976 62
1200UTC 04.10.2016 96 20.4N 76.1W 977 54
0000UTC 05.10.2016 108 22.2N 75.8W 970 63
1200UTC 05.10.2016 120 23.5N 75.5W 966 67
0000UTC 06.10.2016 132 24.7N 75.8W 961 69
1200UTC 06.10.2016 144 26.2N 76.8W 945 80
HURRICANE MATTHEW ANALYSED POSITION : 13.8N 70.5W
ATCF IDENTIFIER : AL142016
LEAD CENTRAL MAXIMUM WIND
VERIFYING TIME TIME POSITION PRESSURE (MB) SPEED (KNOTS)
-------------- ---- -------- ------------- -------------
1200UTC 30.09.2016 0 13.8N 70.5W 991 61
0000UTC 01.10.2016 12 13.2N 72.2W 993 50
1200UTC 01.10.2016 24 12.8N 73.9W 994 50
0000UTC 02.10.2016 36 12.9N 74.6W 993 45
1200UTC 02.10.2016 48 13.6N 75.9W 990 49
0000UTC 03.10.2016 60 15.0N 77.1W 983 58
1200UTC 03.10.2016 72 16.5N 77.0W 978 60
0000UTC 04.10.2016 84 18.3N 76.6W 976 62
1200UTC 04.10.2016 96 20.4N 76.1W 977 54
0000UTC 05.10.2016 108 22.2N 75.8W 970 63
1200UTC 05.10.2016 120 23.5N 75.5W 966 67
0000UTC 06.10.2016 132 24.7N 75.8W 961 69
1200UTC 06.10.2016 144 26.2N 76.8W 945 80
0 likes
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models
the MU keeps turning this to the east just offshore as it tries to form Nicole to the northeast of Matthew
1 likes
- gatorcane
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 23693
- Age: 47
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
- Location: Boca Raton, FL
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models
Way too close for us in South Florida looking at this simulated IR from the 12Z GFS:


Last edited by gatorcane on Fri Sep 30, 2016 11:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models
Alright, call me stupid, but the GFS 12Z to is a significant change to how this is riding the east coast of Florida. Close to TS force winds at the beaches.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
0 likes
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 34090
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models
I honestly believe it will go farther west than indicated...may not turn until close to 80W. That would certainly put Florida into play, as well as central and even western Cuba.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
0 likes
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models
It appears it will likely just miss E NC per hour 156 of the 12Z GFS.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models
wxman57 wrote:12Z GFS has stronger ridging north of Matthew at 138 hrs, increasing the risk to the NC coast.
I've been afraid the OBX are going to get impacted even if it's not a direct landfall.
0 likes
- wxman57
- Moderator-Pro Met
- Posts: 23014
- Age: 67
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
- Location: Houston, TX (southwest)
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models
Looks like (according to the GFS) the faster Matthew moves, the greater the risk to the Carolinas, as the ridge will block it from turning NE. The slower it moves, the more time for the front/trof to approach from the west and steer it NE and out to sea. It's always a timing issue. The 12Z GFS is slower than the 06Z.
0 likes
- otterlyspicey
- Tropical Depression
- Posts: 55
- Age: 37
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2015 2:51 pm
- Location: Washington, DC
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models
168 looks like it really begins it's jet eastward again, still easily missing the coast. Matthew really wants to avoid the USA and all signs point to that. Close, but no cigar. Also, Jamaica really looks like it has a scary situation ahead.
Last edited by otterlyspicey on Fri Sep 30, 2016 11:26 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
HURRICANE FLOYD HURRICANE IRENE HURRICANE SANDY
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
- Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
- Contact:
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models
it wont be long until we see if that happens...a turn at 80 or beyond is big trouble for the SE USCrazyC83 wrote:I honestly believe it will go farther west than indicated...may not turn until close to 80W. That would certainly put Florida into play, as well as central and even western Cuba.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
0 likes
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models
Being "trapped" is possible now, or to Mexico/ Panhandle Fl/ Greenland/ etc. Ya think? lol
Not a pro
Not a pro
0 likes
- SouthFLTropics
- Category 5
- Posts: 4239
- Age: 50
- Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 8:04 am
- Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models
GFS trying to get everyone's attention in the SE with that run. Wow!!!
Last edited by SouthFLTropics on Fri Sep 30, 2016 11:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
Fourth Generation Florida Native
Personal Storm History: David 79, Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22, Milton 24
Personal Storm History: David 79, Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22, Milton 24
- toad strangler
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 4545
- Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 3:09 pm
- Location: Earth
- Contact:
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models
Yesterday the GFS showed a lick of the FL E coast. Today the GFS shows a harder lick. Literally every mile in movement counts.
Last edited by toad strangler on Fri Sep 30, 2016 11:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
My Weather Station
https://www.wunderground.com/dashboard/pws/KFLPORTS603
https://www.wunderground.com/dashboard/pws/KFLPORTS603
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models
The only reason the GFS turns east this run is because it spins up some random low to Matthew's NE that breaks up the ridge just in time to avoid US landfall. That, however, is not something I'd recommend betting on, especially since it's in the 6-7 day timeframe. If not for that low, this would've likely made landfall.
I'll upload a GIF in a minute.
I'll upload a GIF in a minute.
0 likes
I'm a busy grad student, not a professional forecaster. Please refer to the NHC and NWS for official forecasts.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests