ATL: ISAIAS - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
tiger_deF
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 468
Age: 24
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2016 11:47 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#321 Postby tiger_deF » Mon Jul 27, 2020 9:57 am

aspen wrote:Could the large size of 92L and the nearby dry air potentially cause it to fragment into two or more areas of vorticity, with one taking over to eventually become a TC?


Maybe, the southern portion of 92L with the convection is moving west while the actual center has a northern component.

Honestly with the conditions now and the way the year has gone I wouldn't be surprised if we had a major hurricane or no formation at all
2 likes   

User avatar
chaser1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5464
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Longwood, Fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#322 Postby chaser1 » Mon Jul 27, 2020 10:01 am

HurricaneEnzo wrote:
chaser1 wrote:I think we are reaching a point with this particular disturbance that I was most concerned about prior to the start of the season. Particularly strong easterly trades resulting in potent tropical disturbances to remain low latitude until reaching a point further west in the basin. Then, given more conducive conditions development begins to occur resulting in a greater number of storms to develop or track into the Caribbean thus posing an increased landfall threat to the Greater Antilles, Yucatan, and CONUS. 92L has plenty of time to develop and still pose a primary threat to the Leewards and Puerto Rico but I'm worried that the greater threat may be to Cuba and GOM.


Maybe we will have to see. It it gets to the E Carib and is still this disorganized I think it gets shredded or suffers a fate similar to Gonzalo.


Your overall perception of conditions in the E. Caribbean are correct especially as it applies to small tropical cyclones tracking west at lower latitudes. One particular cause is an interruption of surface convergence due to proximity to South America. Upper level winds seem to commonly plague tropical cyclones in this region as well. At the same time however, there have been notable tropical storms and hurricanes which actually blossomed and bomb-out in the Eastern Caribbean. The one thing I will say is that 92L has such a large envelope that lower level convergence should be the least of it's problems. I really think that the biggest impediment to development has been the inability for a vertical column to develop in large part due to lack of organized convection. SAL might have contributed but mid level heights are fairly stout. I think the combination of fast westerly motion and added mid level capping have mostly contributed to lack of deep convection. If we do begin to see a healthier burst of convection that can sustain for a good part of a day then this might be a clue that the broad behemoth of a system might be slowing down just enough for a tighter vertical core to form and establish itself. If that happens, it's game over and we'll have something to really worry about. For what it's worth, the 500mb flow in the E. Caribbean is more relaxed. Ironically this may end up being this system's sweet spot.
5 likes   
Andy D

(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)

TheStormExpert

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#323 Postby TheStormExpert » Mon Jul 27, 2020 10:03 am

wxman57 wrote:It is failing to consolidate. Ingesting a lot of dry Saharan air. Moving too quickly. Less model support for development and strengthening today. NHC will begin gradually lowering development chances, which I agree with. Perhaps I will be able to take some of the 5 comp days I've accrued over the past 2 weeks.

Yep there wording in the 8am TWO is a indication that they’ll likely lower chances of development starting with the 2pm TWO assuming the 12z suite doesn’t abruptly change its tune.
0 likes   

sma10
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1710
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 1:13 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#324 Postby sma10 » Mon Jul 27, 2020 10:07 am

djones65 wrote:I just heard that Isaias just said the EXACT same thing about "sma10!" :D


I would believe you ... if there was actually a real person named Isiaias :ggreen:
2 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#325 Postby wxman57 » Mon Jul 27, 2020 10:14 am

sma10 wrote:
djones65 wrote:I just heard that Isaias just said the EXACT same thing about "sma10!" :D


I would believe you ... if there was actually a real person named Isiaias :ggreen:


From Wikipedia, it appears that Isaias is a popular name for Brazil soccer players. ;-)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaias_(given_name)
7 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#326 Postby Aric Dunn » Mon Jul 27, 2020 10:18 am

Given the current trends I highly doubt they lower the numbers.
9 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
ouragans
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 490
Age: 53
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 12:09 pm
Location: Abymes, Guadeloupe F.W.I
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#327 Postby ouragans » Mon Jul 27, 2020 10:22 am

NHC said "development in a day or two" , so if development occurs on wednesday, we're still in. This kind of huge system take time to consolidate, and SAL is not really an issue. It's creating its own moisture environment
8 likes   
Personal forecast disclaimer
This post is a personal point of view, not an information. Please refer to official statements for life-threatening decisions.

David '79, Frederic '79, Hugo '89, Iris, Luis & Marilyn '95, Georges '98, Lenny '99, Dean '07, Irma '17, Maria '17, Fiona '22, Philippe '23, Tammy '23
16°13'33.3,"6N -61°36'39.5"W

TheStormExpert

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#328 Postby TheStormExpert » Mon Jul 27, 2020 10:26 am

wxman57 wrote:
sma10 wrote:
djones65 wrote:I just heard that Isaias just said the EXACT same thing about "sma10!" :D


I would believe you ... if there was actually a real person named Isiaias :ggreen:


From Wikipedia, it appears that Isaias is a popular name for Brazil soccer players. ;-)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaias_(given_name)

Fortunately if trends continue and it briefly develops into Isaias we won’t have to say the name for long. :lol:

 https://twitter.com/derekortt/status/1287734542657359873


0 likes   

User avatar
AnnularCane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2862
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 9:18 am
Location: Wytheville, VA

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#329 Postby AnnularCane » Mon Jul 27, 2020 10:28 am

wxman57 wrote:
sma10 wrote:
djones65 wrote:I just heard that Isaias just said the EXACT same thing about "sma10!" :D


I would believe you ... if there was actually a real person named Isiaias :ggreen:


From Wikipedia, it appears that Isaias is a popular name for Brazil soccer players. ;-)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaias_(given_name)



We should toss a soccer ball to 92L and see what he does with it. :wink:

The pronunciation can be learned, but the problem is that saying the name doesn't seem to come naturally to someone who isn't a native Spanish (or Portuguese) speaker. (I hope that wasn't too awkwardly worded.)
1 likes   

RT23
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 65
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 2:21 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#330 Postby RT23 » Mon Jul 27, 2020 10:33 am

Ok for the ignoramus in me, should we be caution about that area of spin in the lower SW quad?
1 likes   

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15446
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#331 Postby NDG » Mon Jul 27, 2020 10:34 am

Image
8 likes   

St0rmTh0r
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 369
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2020 8:04 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#332 Postby St0rmTh0r » Mon Jul 27, 2020 10:38 am

Boy oh boy better hope this never gets going and stays away from land the storm surge with this would be UNBELIEVABLE!!!
5 likes   

St0rmTh0r
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 369
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2020 8:04 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#333 Postby St0rmTh0r » Mon Jul 27, 2020 10:40 am

RT23 wrote:Ok for the ignoramus in me, should we be caution about that area of spin in the lower SW quad?

I saw that too definitely looks like it has some spin. The larger circulation should win out but it is possible it could break free and keep west
1 likes   

User avatar
northjaxpro
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8900
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:21 am
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#334 Postby northjaxpro » Mon Jul 27, 2020 10:44 am

St0rmTh0r wrote:
RT23 wrote:Ok for the ignoramus in me, should we be caution about that area of spin in the lower SW quad?

I saw that too definitely looks like it has some spin. The larger circulation should win out but it is possible it could break free and keep west


I have been curious about that vigorous piece of energy all morning.
0 likes   
NEVER, EVER SAY NEVER in the tropics and weather in general, and most importantly, with life itself!!

________________________________________________________________________________________

Fay 2008 Beryl 2012 Debby 2012 Colin 2016 Hermine 2016 Julia 2016 Matthew 2016 Irma 2017 Dorian 2019

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#335 Postby Aric Dunn » Mon Jul 27, 2020 10:47 am

northjaxpro wrote:
St0rmTh0r wrote:
RT23 wrote:Ok for the ignoramus in me, should we be caution about that area of spin in the lower SW quad?

I saw that too definitely looks like it has some spin. The larger circulation should win out but it is possible it could break free and keep west


I have been curious about that vigorous piece of energy all morning.


Well, it is the center of the overall system and the only well-defined vorticity..

So not really all that much else to focus on. :P
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

RT23
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 65
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 2:21 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#336 Postby RT23 » Mon Jul 27, 2020 10:48 am

Aric Dunn wrote:
northjaxpro wrote:
St0rmTh0r wrote:I saw that too definitely looks like it has some spin. The larger circulation should win out but it is possible it could break free and keep west


I have been curious about that vigorous piece of energy all morning.


Well, it is the center of the overall system and the only well-defined vorticity..

So not really all that much else to focus on. :P



Much Lower than what NHC is calling the centre of 92 L
3 likes   

RT23
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 65
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 2:21 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#337 Postby RT23 » Mon Jul 27, 2020 10:56 am

no 1100 TWO from NHC as yet
0 likes   

St0rmTh0r
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 369
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2020 8:04 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#338 Postby St0rmTh0r » Mon Jul 27, 2020 10:59 am

Aric Dunn wrote:
northjaxpro wrote:
St0rmTh0r wrote:I saw that too definitely looks like it has some spin. The larger circulation should win out but it is possible it could break free and keep west


I have been curious about that vigorous piece of energy all morning.


Well, it is the center of the overall system and the only well-defined vorticity..

So not really all that much else to focus on. :P

The center looks like the broad circulation to the north of this or maybe I'm wrong?
0 likes   

St0rmTh0r
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 369
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2020 8:04 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#339 Postby St0rmTh0r » Mon Jul 27, 2020 11:00 am

RT23 wrote:no 1100 TWO from NHC as yet

They may not be sure how to word it
0 likes   

RT23
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 65
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 2:21 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#340 Postby RT23 » Mon Jul 27, 2020 11:02 am

Aric Dunn wrote:
northjaxpro wrote:
St0rmTh0r wrote:I saw that too definitely looks like it has some spin. The larger circulation should win out but it is possible it could break free and keep west


I have been curious about that vigorous piece of energy all morning.


Well, it is the center of the overall system and the only well-defined vorticity..

So not really all that much else to focus on. :P


Well if that flare up of vorticity and convections continues, may that is where the COC maybe redefined.
2 likes   


Return to “2020”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests