TS Ernesto Analysis,Sat Pics,Models Thread 6
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
- ConvergenceZone
- Category 5
- Posts: 5194
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
- Location: Northern California
gatorcane wrote:ConvergenceZone wrote:KFDM Meteorologist wrote:It's over!!!! Same thing happened to chris. 95% chance it will not make it!!
hehe, and this is a MET saying this folks....I"m sure the posting in this thread will slow down significantlly once the boredom of this soon to be wave sets in.......
Yep lets see it pull a Chris........shouldn't be too long once that shear gets to it.
Plus, I'm sure that with a 95% chance of dissipation that the next advisory from the NHC will probably show the dissipation happening as well.
0 likes
- Wthrman13
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 502
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2003 12:44 pm
- Location: West Lafayette, IN
- Contact:
Sanibel wrote:
I'm glad you answered this that way. You couldn't be more wrong. Sometimes technically excellent observers can miss the subtle.
The reason why some storms have stronger "heart" than others is probably provable. In my years of observing cyclones in the Atlantic I've seen a tendency of some storms to possess an intangible extra quality that gives them something above other systems. While I agree a cyclone is the sum of its scientific surroundings I have seen disturbances of equal magnitude (pressure, convection, dvorak, circulation etc) get impacted by the exact same amounts of environmental negatives and react differently. I'm talking about identical disturbances that enter identical synoptics. Some survive and some don't. Therein is the proof of storm "heart". Scientifically, it could be a persisting combination of favorable variables that work in favor of one equal system over the other - but never the less that is the same thing. Remember, even NHC admits it doesn't know everything about cyclones.
Your inference that uncentered nocturnal refire is meaningless goes against the numerous examples of dislocated refires that then went on to become major storms. I could point out dozens.
Sanibel, with all respect, I doubt you or anyone else has the ability to make the assessment that "identical" storms in "identical" synoptics behaved differently. Almost certainly more likely, there were subtle differences in the storm structure or the environment that went undetected that in turn lead to the different behavior of the two seemingly identical storms. Some of these differences, as you said, we may indeed not know about, and are awaiting discovery, but in most cases I think it's just a matter of us not being able to observe the atmosphere in enough detail in real time. I'm convinced that if many of these systems you speak of were revisted in a careful scientific study, certain important differences would be noticed that were not noticed at the time they actually happened. Researchers see this all the time when they do detailed case studies on different events.
Last edited by Wthrman13 on Fri Aug 25, 2006 2:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
-
- Tropical Low
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 11:26 pm
- Location: NEW ORLEANS, LA
- Contact:
I believe Ernesto did almost the same thing yesterday. With that being said you can see a new burst of convection on the nw edge of the ball of convection kinda like its tryn to keatch up. http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t2/sloop-rb.html
It did this almost yesterday but the "seperation" was to the south towards SA and it regenerated over night and became better organized now its doin it again. well i gtg i have 2 get to work now.
It did this almost yesterday but the "seperation" was to the south towards SA and it regenerated over night and became better organized now its doin it again. well i gtg i have 2 get to work now.

0 likes
-
- Military Met
- Posts: 4372
- Age: 56
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
- Location: Roan Mountain, TN
- GeneratorPower
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1648
- Age: 45
- Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 11:48 pm
- Location: Huntsville, AL
-
- Tropical Low
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 6:29 am
- Location: NYC
Wow, many here have nearly written off a storm that a) for the first time has a clearly identifiable closed circulation, b) has only recently shown significant bursts of deep convection over that circulation (not at the moment but the we're still very early in this game and probably between pulses), c) is currently in a marginally favorable environment and will be moving into an improving environment within the next 36 hours (the much maligned C-W Carib shear is not static and is influenced by ongoing environmental factors that have done their harm and will soon begin a slow ramp-down), and d) has within the last 2 hours given up its first TS wind ob.
Nobody can forecast exactly what is to become of Ernesto at this point, but we all know that this afternoon through tomorrow evening will see slow development if any.
After that, I believe the factors in favor of development will predominate, however, any real strengthening (IF there is any) will likely not occur until west of Jamaica.
Nobody can forecast exactly what is to become of Ernesto at this point, but we all know that this afternoon through tomorrow evening will see slow development if any.
After that, I believe the factors in favor of development will predominate, however, any real strengthening (IF there is any) will likely not occur until west of Jamaica.
0 likes
- jasons2k
- Storm2k Executive
- Posts: 8245
- Age: 51
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:32 pm
- Location: The Woodlands, TX
Air Force Met wrote:Evil Jeremy wrote:why is everyone writing this system off?
To irritate you...because weaker systems at lower latitudes move more to the west and have a tendency to avoid south Florida.
I know this is late - I was getting lunch and reading-up - but I almost choked on my food when I read that!
0 likes
-
- Tropical Wave
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 3:06 pm
- SouthFloridawx
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 8346
- Age: 46
- Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
- Location: Sarasota, FL
- Contact:
-
- Military Met
- Posts: 4372
- Age: 56
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
- Location: Roan Mountain, TN
Sanibel wrote: I'm glad you answered this that way. You couldn't be more wrong. Sometimes technically excellent observers can miss the subtle.
The reason why some storms have stronger "heart" than others is probably provable. In my years of observing cyclones in the Atlantic I've seen a tendency of some storms to possess an intangible extra quality that gives them something above other systems. While I agree a cyclone is the sum of its scientific surroundings I have seen disturbances of equal magnitude (pressure, convection, dvorak, circulation etc) get impacted by the exact same amounts of environmental negatives and react differently. I'm talking about identical disturbances that enter identical synoptics. Some survive and some don't. Therein is the proof of storm "heart". Scientifically, it could be a particular combination of favorable variables that work in favor of one equal system over the other - but never the less that is the same thing. Remember, even NHC admits it doesn't know everything about cyclones.
Your inference that uncentered nocturnal refire is meaningless goes against the numerous examples of dislocated refires that then went on to become major storms. I could point out dozens.
Heart is a term used to denote "emotion." Those things you cite are scientific aspects to a system. Normally when people use it around here...they are adding some sort of personality to a storm and that is just not the case. There may be some intangibles we miss...but it isn't heart. It doesn't think. It doesn't "have a mind of it's own." It's just we don't understand it.
And as far as the re-fire goes. Go ahead...cite an example where a refire did any good where there was shear (which was my criteria). All the convergence is to the east...and the shear is westerly. That means your refire will be on the east...the latent heat release will be in the eastern quad and all the latent heat release of condensation will be transported AWAY from the LLC...thus doing it NO good...unless the shear relaxes.
Now tell me...SCIENTIFICALLY...what aspect of that do you have a problem with?
0 likes
gatorcane wrote:I agree its fate is being decided today because the TUTT is doing what it can to save the US right now...
thank the TUTT if it succeeds!
Might be a bit of a double-edged sword.. if the storm gains enough latitude it might feel the trough moving through the plains in about 5 days.. otherwise it could just head westward toward mexico. could make it interesting for the gulf coast the farther north it gets... if the trough doesn't totally kill it.
On a related topic... why is everyone saying it is dead? tstms are forming near the center again.. the pressure has fallen about 3 mb since this time yesterday... we've seen dead systems before and this isn't there.. yet. if you believe the models.. the shear will be relaxing soon. we'll see.. but too early to declare it dead/alive/anything. these things are fragile at this state...
Last edited by benny on Fri Aug 25, 2006 2:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 6684
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
- Location: Houston, TX
I'm not writing it off at all but I also see the obvious (shear). I have read the promises of better conditions ahead for Ernesto and other systems this season many times before and it doesn't materialize. We shall see what happens.
Last edited by Stormcenter on Fri Aug 25, 2006 2:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
- gatorcane
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 23692
- Age: 47
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
- Location: Boca Raton, FL
Air Force Met wrote:Sanibel wrote: I'm glad you answered this that way. You couldn't be more wrong. Sometimes technically excellent observers can miss the subtle.
The reason why some storms have stronger "heart" than others is probably provable. In my years of observing cyclones in the Atlantic I've seen a tendency of some storms to possess an intangible extra quality that gives them something above other systems. While I agree a cyclone is the sum of its scientific surroundings I have seen disturbances of equal magnitude (pressure, convection, dvorak, circulation etc) get impacted by the exact same amounts of environmental negatives and react differently. I'm talking about identical disturbances that enter identical synoptics. Some survive and some don't. Therein is the proof of storm "heart". Scientifically, it could be a particular combination of favorable variables that work in favor of one equal system over the other - but never the less that is the same thing. Remember, even NHC admits it doesn't know everything about cyclones.
Your inference that uncentered nocturnal refire is meaningless goes against the numerous examples of dislocated refires that then went on to become major storms. I could point out dozens.
Heart is a term used to denote "emotion." Those things you cite are scientific aspects to a system. Normally when people use it around here...they are adding some sort of personality to a storm and that is just not the case. There may be some intangibles we miss...but it isn't heart. It doesn't think. It doesn't "have a mind of it's own." It's just we don't understand it.
And as far as the re-fire goes. Go ahead...cite an example where a refire did any good where there was shear (which was my criteria). All the convergence is to the east...and the shear is westerly. That means your refire will be on the east...the latent heat release will be in the eastern quad and all the latent heat release of condensation will be transported AWAY from the LLC...thus doing it NO good...unless the shear relaxes.
Now tell me...SCIENTIFICALLY...what aspect of that do you have a problem with?
I agree Ernesto is going to need a pretty big stroke of luck to reorganize with the center so far displaced from the convergence and the increasing westerly shear.
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 6684
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
- Location: Houston, TX
NESDIS Met wrote:Wow, many here have nearly written off a storm that a) for the first time has a clearly identifiable closed circulation, b) has only recently shown significant bursts of deep convection over that circulation (not at the moment but the we're still very early in this game and probably between pulses), c) is currently in a marginally favorable environment and will be moving into an improving environment within the next 36 hours (the much maligned C-W Carib shear is not static and is influenced by ongoing environmental factors that have done their harm and will soon begin a slow ramp-down), and d) has within the last 2 hours given up its first TS wind ob.
Nobody can forecast exactly what is to become of Ernesto at this point, but we all know that this afternoon through tomorrow evening will see slow development if any.
I agree with you...That this is the first time they could easly find a LLC with this system. In this system is likely better organized today then yesterday. But the system is still racin westward at the tutt. Yes I can read these maps in yes the tutt is moving westward to...With the gfs forecasting it only moving(12z) showing the wall of shear moving back to only 75-78 west. If this storm doe's not slow down its chances go way down. But if it doe's its chances look alright. Another thing you need to look at is how the outflow channel set up.
After that, I believe the factors in favor of development will predominate, however, any real strengthening (IF there is any) will likely not occur until west of Jamaica.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: convergencezone2, HurricaneRyan, texsn95, zal0phus and 38 guests