orangeblood wrote:snownado wrote:Gotwood wrote:I’m not buying the Nam on temps.
See my other post above. With the upper levels looking like this, the warmer temps check out (could even be underdone)...
[url]https://i.ibb.co/jPh2skYx/Screenshot-2026-01-20-205826.png [/url]
NAM 3km is the one to follow from this point forward on surface temps IMO, it’s faster with the frz line and stronger with the Arctic HP currently. Precip can get wacky though but it’s good for temps at this range
Starting to get into view of FV3. I didn't mind this model during synoptic rain set ups during the past year.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or 












