ATL: FLORENCE - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Vdogg
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 621
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2016 9:56 am

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#3321 Postby Vdogg » Mon Sep 10, 2018 5:17 pm

Blinhart wrote:
Shell Mound wrote:
tallywx wrote:
Consensus track now appears to be Morehead City to Greenville to Rocky Mount as opposed to Wilmington to Fayetteville to Raleigh. That slight shift would take millions of people out of the RFQ.

The EPS/ECMWF had a notorious short-term W bias with Irma last year as that hurricane neared South FL and the Keys. I'm not surprised to see the E shifts in guidance. I'm not downplaying this storm, but I've always suspected the worst-case scenario(s) were improbable. This will still be a very serious event, but far less than it could have been, at least in my humble view.

This will be a horrible position for all the Carolina's and DelMarVa. There will be continous powerful winds with rain on top of it for days. This is a horrific situation, just because a system comes in 40 miles further North than one spot doesn't mean it will not be serious. You are talking about serious storm surge going up all the bays, including Chesapeake Bay.

Exactly. That shift is catastrophic for Norfolk/Va. Beach. It takes millions out of RFQ, to only put a different million in it.
1 likes   

PandaCitrus
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 424
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:44 pm

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#3322 Postby PandaCitrus » Mon Sep 10, 2018 5:19 pm

A northern Norfolk/VA Hit with RFQ and then up Chesapeake Bay is the ultimate catastrophic scenario puts many, many millions and DC metro in harms way. There were model runs last week that hinted at this scenario.
1 likes   

supercane4867
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4966
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:43 am

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#3323 Postby supercane4867 » Mon Sep 10, 2018 5:20 pm

Image
0 likes   

Ken711
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1074
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 12:48 pm

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#3324 Postby Ken711 » Mon Sep 10, 2018 5:22 pm

supercane4867 wrote:[im g]https://i.imgur.com/4E1iGyy.gif[/img]


Very close to Euro landfall location.
1 likes   

Sciencerocks
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9155
Age: 39
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:51 am

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#3325 Postby Sciencerocks » Mon Sep 10, 2018 5:23 pm

The gfs is truly a funny model.

I'd take its southern North Carolina final landfall inline with the ecmwf as where it is going to make landfall as it will likely be a straight "line" track into the Carolina's.
Last edited by Sciencerocks on Mon Sep 10, 2018 5:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

hurricaneCW
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1794
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:20 am
Location: Toms River, NJ

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#3326 Postby hurricaneCW » Mon Sep 10, 2018 5:24 pm

Even when the Gfs misses NC on the first try, it still manages to get them. That's what happens when you have nothing but ridges for thousands of miles out.

Gfs essentially loops her around the gulf stream and waits for the next ridge to build to her northeast and send her to the coast. We'd be talking days and days of pounding surf and erosion before the storm even makes LF.
Last edited by hurricaneCW on Mon Sep 10, 2018 5:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

PandaCitrus
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 424
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:44 pm

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#3327 Postby PandaCitrus » Mon Sep 10, 2018 5:24 pm

GFS does a loop de loop stall to get to the same place as Euro. That says it all. CRAZYTOWN.
1 likes   

Ken711
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1074
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 12:48 pm

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#3328 Postby Ken711 » Mon Sep 10, 2018 5:24 pm

PandaCitrus wrote:A northern Norfolk/VA Hit with RFQ and then up Chesapeake Bay is the ultimate catastrophic scenario puts many, many millions and DC metro in harms way. There were model runs last week that hinted at this scenario.


I'd be surprised to see it move NE up the Chesapeake Bay.
0 likes   

PandaCitrus
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 424
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:44 pm

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#3329 Postby PandaCitrus » Mon Sep 10, 2018 5:25 pm

Now moving NNE through eastern NC.

Image
0 likes   

PandaCitrus
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 424
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:44 pm

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#3330 Postby PandaCitrus » Mon Sep 10, 2018 5:27 pm

I'd be surprised to see it move NE up the Chesapeake Bay.


The models last week had some prolonged NNW runs that went straight to DC after hitting the outer banks. There weren't stalls or loop de loops. It was a parabolic northwest path.
1 likes   

tallywx
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 790
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 10:19 am
Location: Raleigh/Durham, NC

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#3331 Postby tallywx » Mon Sep 10, 2018 5:29 pm

hurricaneCW wrote:Even when the Gfs misses NC on the first try, it still manages to get them. That's what happens when you have nothing but ridges for thousands of miles out.

Gfs essentially loops her around the gulf stream and waits for the next ridge to build to her northeast and send her to the coast. We'd be talking days and days of pounding surf and erosion before the storm even makes LF.


That would be the Diana 1984 track and you'd have to expect serious core degradation due to upwelling and continental dry air intrusion during the loop.
0 likes   

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6108
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#3332 Postby cheezyWXguy » Mon Sep 10, 2018 5:31 pm

As ridiculous as this model run is, it's a little unnerving that it isn't the first time the gfs has shown this move, or this intensity. The intensity is obviously overblown, but it does suggest the possibility that Florence could be moving very slowly in an environment that would allow it to strengthen or at least maintain until landfall...wherever that is. I couldn't be further from taking this as gospel, but I can't help but acknowledge the possibility of some version of this occurring.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hypercane_Kyle
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3352
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:58 pm
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#3333 Postby Hypercane_Kyle » Mon Sep 10, 2018 5:32 pm

FV3-GFS has a far better handle on Florence, 12z FV3-GFS close to the ECMWF/NHC.
1 likes   
My posts are my own personal opinion, defer to the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and other NOAA products for decision making during hurricane season.

User avatar
Emmett_Brown
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1432
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:10 pm
Location: Sarasota FL

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#3334 Postby Emmett_Brown » Mon Sep 10, 2018 5:35 pm

So, does this mess up the tight clustering and agreement we had yesterday? It appears the new ridge forecasted to build in is giving the GFS and it's new replacement the FV3 fits. The forecast is getting more difficult near landfall it would seem.
0 likes   

User avatar
Emmett_Brown
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1432
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:10 pm
Location: Sarasota FL

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#3335 Postby Emmett_Brown » Mon Sep 10, 2018 5:36 pm

Hypercane_Kyle wrote:FV3-GFS has a far better handle on Florence, 12z FV3-GFS close to the ECMWF/NHC.


Even the FV3 shows a terrible looping scenario just inland from the coast, so there is definitely some uncertainty being introduced by that new ridge.
1 likes   

Ken711
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1074
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 12:48 pm

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#3336 Postby Ken711 » Mon Sep 10, 2018 5:37 pm

PandaCitrus wrote:
I'd be surprised to see it move NE up the Chesapeake Bay.


The models last week had some prolonged NNW runs that went straight to DC after hitting the outer banks. There weren't stalls or loop de loops. It was a parabolic northwest path.


Not what the NHC and models are showing presently though.
Last edited by Ken711 on Mon Sep 10, 2018 5:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
meriland29
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 770
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2017 11:05 am

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#3337 Postby meriland29 » Mon Sep 10, 2018 5:38 pm

Is it likely or possible this change in latitude now will cause her to hit a less populated bit or stay offshore and go out?
0 likes   

tallywx
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 790
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 10:19 am
Location: Raleigh/Durham, NC

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#3338 Postby tallywx » Mon Sep 10, 2018 5:41 pm

Emmett_Brown wrote:
Hypercane_Kyle wrote:FV3-GFS has a far better handle on Florence, 12z FV3-GFS close to the ECMWF/NHC.


Even the FV3 shows a terrible looping scenario just inland from the coast, so there is definitely some uncertainty being introduced by that new ridge.


The new ridge is concerning and could be the downstream sink of the upward motion now being introduced by the strengthening disturbance over the Carib/GOM. It builds in and blocks the storm from coming in initially, but then provides the shield and steering to loop it back in as opposed to OTS track. Of course one has to wonder what would be left of the system on such a track. Would convection get stripped away during the loop (Diana 1984), or could it maintain or build (Elena 1985)?
0 likes   

User avatar
meriland29
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 770
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2017 11:05 am

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#3339 Postby meriland29 » Mon Sep 10, 2018 5:44 pm

tallywx wrote:
Emmett_Brown wrote:
Hypercane_Kyle wrote:FV3-GFS has a far better handle on Florence, 12z FV3-GFS close to the ECMWF/NHC.


Even the FV3 shows a terrible looping scenario just inland from the coast, so there is definitely some uncertainty being introduced by that new ridge.


The new ridge is concerning and could be the downstream sink of the upward motion now being introduced by the strengthening disturbance over the Carib/GOM. It builds in and blocks the storm from coming in initially, but then provides the shield and steering to loop it back in as opposed to OTS track. Of course one has to wonder what would be left of the system on such a track. Would convection get stripped away during the loop (Diana 1984), or could it maintain or build (Elena 1985)?


Forgive me, but what does 'downstream sink' mean? At least in this case? Would the trajectory take a more W or WSW motion?
0 likes   

User avatar
Blinhart
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2081
Age: 48
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 3:13 pm
Location: Crowley, La.

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#3340 Postby Blinhart » Mon Sep 10, 2018 5:45 pm

meriland29 wrote:Is it likely or possible this change in latitude now will cause her to hit a less populated bit or stay offshore and go out?


If it gets within 100 miles of the coast, it will be causing serious hazards all across the East Coast. This storm is probably already over 200 miles wide and growing, so this will have effects all the way up and down the East coast.
2 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.


Return to “2018”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests