orangeblood wrote:cheezyWXguy wrote:Ntxw wrote:
I was a little surprised too. GEFS/EPS on average you'd give 50/50 based on the number of members showing snowfall for DFW. The upper end has some doozies. 1 in 2 is a pretty probability given the range. But shows perhaps they are weighing more heavily on the Euro OP. Once that switches it should change.
I expect them to be even more conservative than usual for the next couple days, even if trends continue, due to last years storm and the hype and weariness that surrounds it among the public. I’ve had family friends ask me in advance of some of our normal nightly freezes this year if they needed to worry about power or getting supplies. With last year’s storm still so fresh in everyone’s mind, I imagine the nws does not want to talk this up until it’s a sure thing
The problem with this approach is relying too much on ERCOT to correct their mistakes from last year , do you have faith in that ? I sure don’t. IMO, best to get the word out now so most can prepare way ahead of time individually instead of relying on ERCOT to adequately supply them with electricity/heat. The “probability” basis FW NWS office is using for a winter storm doesn’t make a lot of sense….we’re looking at the same output they are and it’s greater than 20% and arguably quite significantly
Haha, I haven’t had faith in ERCOT since 2011 when they used rolling blackouts to keep the Super Bowl afloat (prior to that I was just a teenager who never paid attention). And I agree, I think more highlighting of the potential range of scenarios is warranted, I’m just expecting them to hold back for a while longer and providing the reason why I think so.