ATL: HARVEY - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Exalt
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 337
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2015 10:55 pm

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3781 Postby Exalt » Fri Aug 25, 2017 1:02 pm

I'm mad that they didn't upgrade it. People get scared when it comes to rising intensities and it might give the on the fence people the kick in the butt to leave and get the hell outta dodge.
1 likes   

User avatar
Kingarabian
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 16082
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3782 Postby Kingarabian » Fri Aug 25, 2017 1:02 pm

945mb and still only 95kts? What's with the p/w difference. I thought I would be waking up to a cat.4 with its satellite representation 7 hours ago.

Nonetheless Harvey is still an extremely strong storm. Does not need to be a major for there to be catastrophic damage. Hopefully people in its path already evacuated.
Last edited by Kingarabian on Fri Aug 25, 2017 1:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
RIP Kobe Bryant

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3783 Postby RL3AO » Fri Aug 25, 2017 1:02 pm

ALhurricane wrote:
RL3AO wrote:
ALhurricane wrote:Well they kept it a 2 for now. Kind of surprised. It is darn close that's for sure.


As Ryan Maue said - It's a category 2.99


Well in this instance I would round up. :D


Well NHC uses the floor function I guess. :lol:
2 likes   

LearnedHat
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 77
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 11:17 am
Location: Keller, TX

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3784 Postby LearnedHat » Fri Aug 25, 2017 1:02 pm

Fountainguy97 wrote:Umm the maximum wind speed certainly does matter. The difference between cat 2 and 3, although not life changing, is a big deal for the fact of a major hurricane land falling on the he continental US for many years. On a weather level yes it matters


If people and property are concerns #1 and #2, the interest in the record book impact for weather junkies, although intriguing, has to somewhere around #27
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 23020
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3785 Postby wxman57 » Fri Aug 25, 2017 1:02 pm

That dropsonde reading of 102 kts is not a 1-minute average, but I suspect that stronger winds exist elsewhere, so it's probably up to Cat 3.
9 likes   

hurricaneCW
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1795
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:20 am
Location: Toms River, NJ

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3786 Postby hurricaneCW » Fri Aug 25, 2017 1:04 pm

Fountainguy97 wrote:Umm the maximum wind speed certainly does matter. The difference between cat 2 and 3, although not life changing, is a big deal for the fact of a major hurricane land falling on the he continental US for many years. On a weather level yes it matters


In terms of impacts we're literally talking about a 1 mph difference so it means nothing but I guess if the numbers mean so much to people then sure w.e. Yes we haven't had a major hit us in 12 years but we've seen storms like Sandy, Matthew, and now Harvey so does it matter if we continue the streak bc it shouldn't.

It won't help save lives and prevent Harvey's destruction just bc he doesn't hit as a major that's for sure.
0 likes   

Hurricane_Apu
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 124
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:47 pm

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3787 Postby Hurricane_Apu » Fri Aug 25, 2017 1:04 pm

The NHC is always extra conservative at major intensity milestones... INVEST>TC, TS>Hurricane, Hurricane > Major.

Their forecasting skill is still second to none, but when classifying storms they act like picky art critics.
4 likes   

User avatar
Cunxi Huang
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 329
Age: 27
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2013 12:17 pm
Location: San Jose, CA
Contact:

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3788 Postby Cunxi Huang » Fri Aug 25, 2017 1:05 pm

banding eye...? :double:

Image
2 likes   
06 SuTY SAOMAI | 09 TY LINFA | 10 TY FANAPI | 10 SuTY MEGI | 16 SuTY MERANTI | 19 SuTY LEKIMA | 24 C2 FRANCINE
DO NOT use my posts for life and death decisions. For official information, please refer to products from your RSMC and national weather agency.

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9623
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Gulf of Gavin Newsom

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3789 Postby Steve » Fri Aug 25, 2017 1:05 pm

CycloneGuru wrote:
Steve wrote:Despite the uptick, there are a couple of positives I see. First it's got a big envelope, but it's a fairly concentrated storm. Secondly, it's the wrong time of day for Harvey to peak. He's making a run for the coast now, and while it's pretty concentric and nasty in the outer center of circulation, it could be way worse. That doesn't mean to infer that it won't tighten or explode in a few hours at approach. That remains to be seen. Also lucky for the coast so far, it's a relatively weak and diffuse west side of the storm. That was the North side of Isaac in 2012. Not having those advance few inches of rain makes a giant difference when the winds get up to gale and beyond. However, it won't really matter because it's going to be destructive anyway. On the "bad" scale for first landfall, I'd give it a 7 to 7.5.


What do you think far as 2nd landfall If any...


I don't know. If the 00Z European was close to being right, probably the Triangle (Beaumont-Port Arthur-Orange) or Lake Charles MSA get the beating . I don't mean to be a wimp on a call, but the way the models have agreed, disagreed, moved, moved back, etc., I just don't have much confidence even in the short term. Some bring it around San Antonio and rain it out. Some keep it in South Texas or NE Mexico and rain it out. Some loop and bring back to and off the coast. Some come back close to the coast. With those types of inconsistencies between the ones I like to look at, when in doubt, see what the European does and work from that. I'm not saying it's going to be right. But I usually have to figure out what it's doing in order to get a better understanding and then decide if I agree or disagree with it.
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3790 Postby RL3AO » Fri Aug 25, 2017 1:05 pm

102 kt is an instantaneous reading. No other wind data supports 100 knots yet.
1 likes   

hurricaneCW
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1795
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:20 am
Location: Toms River, NJ

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3791 Postby hurricaneCW » Fri Aug 25, 2017 1:08 pm

Exalt wrote:I'm mad that they didn't upgrade it. People get scared when it comes to rising intensities and it might give the on the fence people the kick in the butt to leave and get the hell outta dodge.


Now that does have some merit. For some reason whenever people hear Category 1-2 they don't seem too worried but as soon as they hear 3 then they start leaving. Never understood why that is especially given our damaging history with Cat 1-2 storms.
1 likes   

BYG Jacob

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3792 Postby BYG Jacob » Fri Aug 25, 2017 1:08 pm

Pressure is starting to drop again.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5850
Age: 42
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3793 Postby Hammy » Fri Aug 25, 2017 1:08 pm

RL3AO wrote:102 kt is an instantaneous reading. No other wind data supports 100 knots yet.


Gusts essentially?
0 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
ScottNAtlanta
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2426
Joined: Sat May 25, 2013 3:11 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3794 Postby ScottNAtlanta » Fri Aug 25, 2017 1:09 pm

wxman57 wrote:That dropsonde reading of 102 kts is not a 1-minute average, but I suspect that stronger winds exist elsewhere, so it's probably up to Cat 3.


I feel vindicated :notworthy:
2 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Ntxw
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 22796
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 6:34 pm
Location: DFW, Texas

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3795 Postby Ntxw » Fri Aug 25, 2017 1:09 pm

Board has been warned of strict moderation currently active. Any posts not in good faith or constructive may be deleted without warning.

Stay safe, post friendly, and keep those in the way of the storm in your prayers.
6 likes   
The above post and any post by Ntxw is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including Storm2k. For official information, please refer to NWS products.

  Help support Storm2K!
Help Support Storm2K

User avatar
MGC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5907
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2003 9:05 pm
Location: Pass Christian MS, or what is left.

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3796 Postby MGC » Fri Aug 25, 2017 1:11 pm

Radar eye is much larger since EWRC. Gotta keep an eye on the eye to see if it starts to contract. Larger wind field should equate to larger surge....MGC
0 likes   

Exalt
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 337
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2015 10:55 pm

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3797 Postby Exalt » Fri Aug 25, 2017 1:12 pm

hurricaneCW wrote:
Exalt wrote:I'm mad that they didn't upgrade it. People get scared when it comes to rising intensities and it might give the on the fence people the kick in the butt to leave and get the hell outta dodge.


Now that does have some merit. For some reason whenever people hear Category 1-2 they don't seem too worried but as soon as they hear 3 then they start leaving. Never understood why that is especially given our damaging history with Cat 1-2 storms.


I'm not saying that they're stupid for not upgrading, however when the NHC is quick to upgrade storms to TS status when they look like sheared messes barely worth a name, they really should be consistent in their urgent ways of upgrading especially when it comes to historical standards and these people who seem unphased by Cat 1's and Cat 2's. Especially considering the flooding and storm surge potential from Harvey will be of a Cat 3 or exceeding level, it really makes sense to.
0 likes   

User avatar
storm_in_a_teacup
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 432
Age: 32
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2017 5:01 pm
Location: Huntsville, Alabama (originally from Houston)
Contact:

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3798 Postby storm_in_a_teacup » Fri Aug 25, 2017 1:13 pm

stephen23 wrote:
Soonercane wrote:Is it starting to upwell cooler water?

There is no cooler water to upwell in this area. The warm water runs very deep in this area. Any upwelling just upwells more warm water


So it's basically a buffet for tropical storms? That doesn't sound very reassuring...
0 likes   
I know I can't straddle the atmosphere...just a tiny storm in your teacup, girl.

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34093
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3799 Postby CrazyC83 » Fri Aug 25, 2017 1:13 pm

People are STILL on the beaches right now based on coverage from Corpus Christi. People are so foolish...
2 likes   

SunnyThoughts
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2263
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 12:42 pm
Location: Pensacola, Florida

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#3800 Postby SunnyThoughts » Fri Aug 25, 2017 1:14 pm

Recon headed back in to the eye I think. Maybe wanna drop another sonde and verify the other reading. If they get another cat 3 reading in the eyewall drop, They will probably upgrade imo.
0 likes   


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests