
4PM

It seems the GFDL stayed put. The BAMMS model is also around the GFDL run.
The rest are right above CC. There is still a significant split. So, its all up to the GFDL now.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Air Force Met wrote:Most models have shifted north at 00Z.
All models now b/w Aransas Pass and GLS.
pablolopez26 wrote:It seems the GFDL stayed put. The BAMMS model is also around the GFDL run.
The rest are right above CC. There is still a significant split. So, its all up to the GFDL now.
sphelps8681 wrote:Well Jim C. is in Galveston if I heard correctly. We know what that means. Ha Ha.
sphelps8681 wrote:Well Jim C. is in Galveston if I heard correctly. We know what that means. Ha Ha.
Serenity wrote:sphelps8681 wrote:Well Jim C. is in Galveston if I heard correctly. We know what that means. Ha Ha.
Well how far off is he going to be though?
TTheriot1975 wrote:wow..if that were to stay..then Florida would be back in the picture...lol..just kidding folks...but that would really be a bad thing
In short, a lack of high-density, quality data. All the models have to work with over open waters are satellite data, recon flights when they're out there, and some widely spaced buoy and ship reports. From that, the model has to create its analysis. With all of the interpolation and estimation it has to do, there are bound to be errorsmattpetre wrote:AFM,
Why are initializations off by so much. This is frustrating, so many local mets here in Houston still counting on the Corpus landfall and so many in government not pulling the trigger to force anything to happen. I'm worried that in the end many people will be hurt and/or trapped on highways they didn't think they would be on for more than a few hours. Why can't we erre on the side of caution????
jimguru wrote:Is there one particular model that seems historically to be more accurate than another? Just curious as I have said before I am new to the Gulf / Atlantic Storm Basin Scene.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests