Raleigh K-9 Cop Injured In Accident Dies

Kiko · #41 Postby **Kiko** » Thu Jul 29, 2004 2:56 pm

Out of line? How so? Duck asked a question and I answered it.

Do YOU know the complete circumstances of this accident? If you do, please clue us in.

Sky already said there's been no further reports, so how can anyone say who's to blame for this unfortunate incident with the little info we were given?

Yet anyone who refuses to be a part of the antidog-killer mob becomes fodder for your ire? I own three pets and know I do not deserve it.

Now I have to wonder if the patrolmen aren't asking themselves why they let this dog play next to live traffic--if it's so close to being human. Would anyone let their kids?

Sorry, Lindaloo, I fail to see how setting the record straight can be considered controversial. Or asking questions.

I did re-read the topic and these are the questions it begs to ask.

GalvestonDuck · #42 Postby **GalvestonDuck** » Thu Jul 29, 2004 3:23 pm

Kiko wrote:Out of line? How so? Duck asked a question and I answered it.

Do YOU know the complete circumstances of this accident? If you do, please clue us in.

Sky already said there's been no further reports, so how can anyone say who's to blame for this unfortunate incident with the little info we were given?

Yet anyone who refuses to be a part of the antidog-killer mob becomes fodder for your ire? I own three pets and know I do not deserve it.

Now I have to wonder if the patrolmen aren't asking themselves why they let this dog play next to live traffic--if it's so close to being human. Would anyone let their kids?

Sorry, Lindaloo, I fail to see how setting the record straight can be considered controversial. Or asking questions.

I did re-read the topic and these are the questions it begs to ask.

Actually, the dog was training (as officers in the force often do). It was not "playing."

Lindaloo · #43 Postby **Lindaloo** » Thu Jul 29, 2004 3:24 pm

Kiko wrote:Out of line? How so? Duck asked a question and I answered it.

Do YOU know the complete circumstances of this accident? If you do, please clue us in.

Sky already said there's been no further reports, so how can anyone say who's to blame for this unfortunate incident with the little info we were given?

Yet anyone who refuses to be a part of the antidog-killer mob becomes fodder for your ire? I own three pets and know I do not deserve it.

Now I have to wonder if the patrolmen aren't asking themselves why they let this dog play next to live traffic--if it's so close to being human. Would anyone let their kids?

Sorry, Lindaloo, I fail to see how setting the record straight can be considered controversial. Or asking questions.

I did re-read the topic and these are the questions it begs to ask.

Whatever Kiko. What right do you have coming in here and labeling any of us "anti" anything? Sounds like nothing but a bunch of pot stirring.

And what record did YOU set straight? All you did was tell us YOUR version. :roll:

chadtm80 · #44 Postby **chadtm80** » Thu Jul 29, 2004 3:35 pm

I REALY need to get the "ignore" feature re-installed here at s2k..

Lindaloo · #45 Postby **Lindaloo** » Thu Jul 29, 2004 3:35 pm

chadtm80 wrote:I REALY need to get the "ignore" feature re-installed here at s2k..

AMEN!!

chadtm80 · #46 Postby **chadtm80** » Thu Jul 29, 2004 3:36 pm

bahamaswx wrote:What's wrong with opposition? If she has opposing views, why can't she voice them? You all have a right to post your views, and you often do. Just because hers don't agree with the norm around here, you say she has a "poor attitude"?

Don't label me a "dog hater".

We didnt have to label you anything.. Kiko and yourself wear big old signs around your necks

Lindaloo · #47 Postby **Lindaloo** » Thu Jul 29, 2004 3:39 pm

#48 Postby **Stephanie** » Thu Jul 29, 2004 3:46 pm

It's the way you guys are saying it Bahamas and Kiko. You're opinions are valid but heck you're SO defensive and you do nothing but put people on the defensive;

If the anger displayed here on a message board is any indication, this dog killer is guilty until proven innocent and should throw him/herself on the mercy of the court for protection, because you're starting to sound like a lynching mob to me.

Get the facts people, then get to making judgements.

Guilty until proven innocent? Can anyone say 'To Kill A Mockingbird'?

No, we do not have all of the facts, but we're making assumptions just like you are (dog hit and then ran off...). It's called A DISCUSSION. There are alot of animal lovers on this board and yes this is going to get some passionate responses.

chadtm80 · #49 Postby **chadtm80** » Thu Jul 29, 2004 3:48 pm

Stephanie wrote:It's the way you guys are saying it Bahamas and Kiko. You're opinions are valid but heck you're SO defensive and you do nothing but put people on the defensive;

If the anger displayed here on a message board is any indication, this dog killer is guilty until proven innocent and should throw him/herself on the mercy of the court for protection, because you're starting to sound like a lynching mob to me.

Get the facts people, then get to making judgements.

Guilty until proven innocent? Can anyone say 'To Kill A Mockingbird'?

No, we do not have all of the facts, but we're making assumptions just like you are (dog hit and then ran off...). It's called A DISCUSSION. There are alot of animal lovers on this board and yes this is going to get some passionate responses.

Thank you steph.. Seeing your "side" on this garbage realy shows that they are being rediculous

GalvestonDuck · #50 Postby **GalvestonDuck** » Thu Jul 29, 2004 3:50 pm

Well said, Stephanie!

Additionally, if I might be so frank, you come off as sounding very arrogant and condescending in your replies, Kiko. No offense, but the whole "intelligence dictates...." line really did it for me.

There are ways to speak influentially and intelligently and then there are ways to come off as an intellectual, pompous, know-it-all. And there's a thin line between the two.

Lindaloo · #51 Postby **Lindaloo** » Thu Jul 29, 2004 4:01 pm

Bravo Steph!!

Kiko · #52 Postby **Kiko** » Thu Jul 29, 2004 4:35 pm

It's called pedantry, Duck. And when people want to apply labels to others, to ridicule and scorn, it's time to use a little on them.

Fight fire with fire? No thanks, I won't sink to that level, but I will rise above it. And I won't be intimidated either.

Yesterday I was told, "there are other topics on the board, post somewhere else". So I see something else of interest, raise a few questions, say what's on my mind, then get told to stop posting?

It was the anger I saw in this thread that wasn't exactly relaxing, friendly chit-chat. Way before I called them on it.

Some like to call it pot-stirring, I'll call it raising the level of awareness that there just may be another side to the story.

Get it?

GalvestonDuck · #53 Postby **GalvestonDuck** » Thu Jul 29, 2004 4:55 pm

Like I said, there's a thin line. It's not so much what you say, but how you say it.

Lindaloo · #54 Postby **Lindaloo** » Thu Jul 29, 2004 5:10 pm

Kiko wrote:It's called pedantry, Duck. And when people want to apply labels to others, to ridicule and scorn, it's time to use a little on them.

Fight fire with fire? No thanks, I won't sink to that level, but I will rise above it. And I won't be intimidated either.

Yesterday I was told, "there are other topics on the board, post somewhere else". So I see something else of interest, raise a few questions, say what's on my mind, then get told to stop posting?

It was the anger I saw in this thread that wasn't exactly relaxing, friendly chit-chat. Way before I called them on it.

Some like to call it pot-stirring, I'll call it raising the level of awareness that there just may be another side to the story.

Get it?

Who are you to police us? Yes, I am the one who said there are more topics to post in. But, once again you show up to stir up controversy. Get it?

Kiko · #55 Postby **Kiko** » Thu Jul 29, 2004 5:28 pm

This has nothing to do with policing, Lindaloo, it's about getting a point to sink in.

Duck, sometimes you have to be VERY precise with metaphysical concepts. Concepts that could help those who show anger identify that it could be misplaced by mistakening attributing the cause.

Sorry for the tenacity, but I refuse to stoop to name-calling and the rest of the crap I see so much of in the middle of these discussions.

What I saw here is very simple: An attitude of guilty until proven innocent. Can I say it more plainly?

chadtm80 · #56 Postby **chadtm80** » Thu Jul 29, 2004 5:43 pm

Fight fire with fire? No thanks, I won't sink to that level, but I will rise above it. And I won't be intimidated either

ROFLMAO!!!! OMG!!!!

Kiko · #57 Postby **Kiko** » Thu Jul 29, 2004 5:48 pm

Kiko wrote:I refuse to stoop to name-calling and the rest of the crap I see so much of in the middle of these discussions.

What I saw here is very simple: An attitude of guilty until proven innocent. Can I say it more plainly?

Stay on topic, Chad.

Lindaloo · #58 Postby **Lindaloo** » Thu Jul 29, 2004 5:55 pm

Kiko wrote:This has nothing to do with policing, Lindaloo, it's about getting a point to sink in.

Duck, sometimes you have to be VERY precise with metaphysical concepts. Concepts that could help those who show anger identify that it could be misplaced by mistakening attributing the cause.

Sorry for the tenacity, but I refuse to stoop to name-calling and the rest of the crap I see so much of in the middle of these discussions.

What I saw here is very simple: An attitude of guilty until proven innocent. Can I say it more plainly?

Stop being so political in EVERY post you make. It is quite boring.

Lindaloo · #59 Postby **Lindaloo** » Thu Jul 29, 2004 5:57 pm

Kiko wrote:Stay on topic, Chad.

Look at his logo. And also, since when is laughing not on topic. Everything that you say is quite laughable and so transparent.

Kiko · #60 Postby **Kiko** » Thu Jul 29, 2004 6:00 pm

Ok, (though I fail to see what's political about this).

Say the dog ran into the parkway and KILLED the people in the car?

Then who's anger do we suffer?

This isn't political, it's what I hear people here say all the time: Look at the problem from all sides.

Anything wrong with that approach?

Raleigh K-9 Cop Injured In Accident Dies

Who is online