Air Force Met wrote:Burn1 wrote:Should see some below normal temps by end of next week in Northern Plains and Desert SW, but not on the extreme side
Again, rest of country should see normal to above normal temps through
Jan 22....
Most of the extreme cold will stay bottled up north of the border with nothing to drive it to far south.
As many have pointed out...this is Siberian air. Right now...the high is sitting over northeast Siberia and ridging into alaska. This is a HUGH high. Not pressure wise...it is double-barreled at about 1050 or so. BUt...the ridging etends from eastern Alaska...all the way back into NE Siberia to the first high...and then back to the sw into south Siberia to the next high.
All models bring these highs down. All of them bring a 1050mb+ into the central plains by late weekend.
Now...given that info...I ask how you can say the air will stay bottled up north of the border and that most of the country will see near normal temps?
Oh...BTW...the normal high for Springfield, MO is 41...and they are calling for a high of 20 on Friday. That is 20 below normal. So...are they wrong (because you say they are supposed to be near normal).
Bottom line is you need to brush up on some arctic air forecasting. Go back and look at 1983. It was a classic example. The flow on Dec. 23 was zonal...east west...all the way from ND to the GOM. YEt...even though the upper flow was due east and no front would have ever made it into TExas with that flow...the siberian air plunged due south and stuck us in the deep-freeze. Siberian air behaves differently and this is SIberian air. IF you think that the country by and large will be near normal through Jan 22...than you are 1) not a very good forecaster...or 2) delusional![]()
Oh...one last thing. The NWS is ND is going for lows Wed night of -20 with wind gusts over 50. That is a wind chill of -60. Then...by Friday...they are going for lows of <-30 and highs of -20.
I think I call that extreme.
YIKES. AIR FORCE MET I CALL THAT A WHIPPIN. WAS THERE A NEED FOR IT WHO KNOWS. BUT GOOD ANALYSIS.