2006 Atlantic Tropical Cyclone Reports Thread

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34067
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#41 Postby CrazyC83 » Fri Dec 01, 2006 3:46 pm

wxman57 wrote:
Category 5 wrote:It says Ernesto caused $500 Million in damage in the U.S, I find that hard to believe.


Ernesto was quite likely a Cat 1 hurricane at landfall, but with a very large tropical storm force wind field. H. Cindy produced about $320 million in damage across SE LA last year, and Ernesto was a bit better organized than Cindy at landfall. I'm not surprised at all that it produced $500 million in damage, particularly since it hit a much more populated area with some very expensive real estate.


Yeah, considering it was initially thought that Ophelia - with much of its windfield offshore - did $1.6 billion in coastal NC and wasn't much stronger, so that doesn't seem as large as you think.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#42 Postby Derek Ortt » Fri Dec 01, 2006 5:32 pm

I would have downgraded Ernesto to about 60-65 mph at landfall in NC (and to 40 in Florida). While it had a much better satellite appearance than Cindy, the observations just do not support hurricane status, unlike with Cindy when it was fairly obvious that it was a hurricane based upon the SFMR and oil rig obs
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#43 Postby Derek Ortt » Fri Dec 01, 2006 5:33 pm

Ernesto caused heavy flooding in Virginia. TC's quite often cause hundreds of millions in damage in this region
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#44 Postby Derek Ortt » Fri Dec 01, 2006 5:35 pm

As for the reports, I am not sure that the primary intent is the general public, but instead other scientists. Those who are the primary recipients have access to either word or adobe (Adobe reader is free... so anyone should be able to open the .pdf versions).

I personally like the format better. It is quick and saves a lot of time and money (anyone write a report in html? If you are not proficient in it, it takes time)
0 likes   

User avatar
AussieMark
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5858
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 6:36 pm
Location: near Sydney, Australia

#45 Postby AussieMark » Fri Dec 01, 2006 6:26 pm

HTML can be very time consuming especially with the formating involved to be used so its a good thing that prelim reports are on *.pdf or *.doc now. gives em more time for other things
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

#46 Postby brunota2003 » Fri Dec 01, 2006 6:31 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:I would have downgraded Ernesto to about 60-65 mph at landfall in NC (and to 40 in Florida). While it had a much better satellite appearance than Cindy, the observations just do not support hurricane status, unlike with Cindy when it was fairly obvious that it was a hurricane based upon the SFMR and oil rig obs
See...another problem is that we do not have oil rigs along our coast just offshore...we have some bouys...but those can be knocked out easily and I dont know how reliable the data in terms of strong winds are...
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 23010
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#47 Postby wxman57 » Fri Dec 01, 2006 7:04 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:
I personally like the format better. It is quick and saves a lot of time and money (anyone write a report in html? If you are not proficient in it, it takes time)


Ever use Microsoft FrontPage? It's identical to MS Word, just about. If you can use MS Word, you can create HTML just as easily. Type text, highlight, make bold, colored, whatever. Drag/drop pictures where you want them. No difference except for the extension it's saved as. PDF is much harder to edit than HTML or MS Word documents.

Anyway, compare the two wind fields at landfall. Ernesto's wind field was much larger than Cindy's. Maps are the same scale.

Cindy:
ftp://ftp.aoml.noaa.gov/pub/hrd/hwind/2 ... l04deg.png

Ernesto:
ftp://ftp.aoml.noaa.gov/pub/hrd/hwind/2 ... l04deg.png

The difference in wind field sizes stands out even better on the 8-degree maps. There's no comparison between the two, Ernesto was more significant as far as the wind field.

Cindy:
ftp://ftp.aoml.noaa.gov/pub/hrd/hwind/2 ... l08deg.png

Ernesto:
ftp://ftp.aoml.noaa.gov/pub/hrd/hwind/2 ... l08deg.png
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#48 Postby Derek Ortt » Fri Dec 01, 2006 8:36 pm

no disagreeing about the wind field size.

Another example of how a weaker system can cause more significant wind impacts due to a larger windfield
0 likes   

User avatar
HarlequinBoy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1400
Age: 34
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 1:57 am
Location: Memphis

#49 Postby HarlequinBoy » Fri Dec 01, 2006 10:13 pm

And there wasn't a large difference in the winds anyways between Cindy and Ernesto (at NC landfall) was there? And into that Ernesto's larger wind field and it's not surprising really.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34067
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#50 Postby CrazyC83 » Sat Dec 02, 2006 10:55 pm

Here are my personal estimates on storm peak intensities and landfall intensities:

TS Alberto - peak 60 kt - landfall 45 kt

TS Beryl - peak 50 kt - landfall 40 kt

TS Chris - peak 50 kt

TS Debby - peak 45 kt

TS Ernesto - peak 60 kt - Haiti peak 55 kt - Cuba landfall 40 kt - Florida landfall 40 kt - NC landfall 60 kt

H Florence - peak 85 kt

H Gordon - peak 105 kt

H Helene - peak 105 kt

H Isaac - peak 75 kt
0 likes   

User avatar
Andrew92
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3247
Age: 41
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 12:35 am
Location: Phoenix, Arizona

#51 Postby Andrew92 » Tue Dec 12, 2006 4:57 pm

0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 146109
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

#52 Postby cycloneye » Tue Dec 12, 2006 6:23 pm

The peak intensity was 55kts.The dry air was the main cause for Chris to weaken.Now only two reports are left including the Ernesto one which will be very interesting to read.,to see if it made landfall as a hurricane or not in North Carolina.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
Chacor
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10229
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Singapore

#53 Postby Chacor » Tue Dec 12, 2006 8:19 pm

The wording in the impact section is suspect. Some of us at Wikipedia think Stewart might have "borrowed" from us... including one line verbatim!
0 likes   

JonathanBelles
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 11430
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 9:00 pm
Location: School: Florida State University (Tallahassee, FL) Home: St. Petersburg, Florida
Contact:

#54 Postby JonathanBelles » Tue Dec 12, 2006 10:49 pm

Chacor wrote:The wording in the impact section is suspect. Some of us at Wikipedia think Stewart might have "borrowed" from us... including one line verbatim!


"including one line verbatim" what? and where did he quote us?
0 likes   

User avatar
Chacor
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10229
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Singapore

#55 Postby Chacor » Wed Dec 13, 2006 2:22 am

TCR impact:

News reports indicate that there were indirect economic effects associated with the Chris
official forecasts. Beginning on 2 August, NHC official forecasts projected Chris to move across
the southeastern and central Gulf of Mexico as a category 1 hurricane. In response to these
forecasts, these price for crude oil rose on the New York Mercantile Exchange at branch offices
in London. Natural gas prices also rose considerably in New York Mercantile Exchange
electronic trading that same day. Anticipation of a threat to supply by a potential Hurricane Chris
coupled with high demand during an ongoing heat wave were cited as factors in the price move.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tropical_S ... eparations:

Anticipation of a threat to supply by a potential Hurricane Chris coupled with high demand during an ongoing heat wave were cited as factors in the price move.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#56 Postby wxmann_91 » Wed Dec 13, 2006 3:31 am

Chacor,

Just wondering, did you copy that verbatim from another source? Perhaps the NHC used the same source and asked for permission to copy it verbatim, from that source.
0 likes   

User avatar
Chacor
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10229
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Singapore

#57 Postby Chacor » Wed Dec 13, 2006 4:42 am

Wouldn't be possible, because we're not allowed to copy sources verbatim on Wiki (copyright infringements and all that). The source that information is attributed to on-wiki (http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid= ... refer=home), does not carry such a sentence.

Regardless, it's a tremendous pat on the back for Wikipedia. Our tropical cyclone articles have now been cited by pretty much everyone - Gary Padgett, CSU, Wunderground... and now possbly the NHC. Wow.
0 likes   

User avatar
Alacane2
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 127
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 2:11 pm
Location: Mobile, Alabama

#58 Postby Alacane2 » Fri Dec 15, 2006 3:39 pm

The Ernesto report has been posted on the NHC website.
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/TCR-AL052006_Ernesto.pdf
0 likes   

User avatar
Chacor
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10229
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Singapore

#59 Postby Chacor » Fri Dec 15, 2006 7:24 pm

They've kept it at hurricane strength. Also no upgrade at NC landfall.
0 likes   

Coredesat

#60 Postby Coredesat » Fri Dec 15, 2006 9:29 pm

Interestingly, they did indicate that the possibility was there:

Since it is possible, however, that the maximum wind was not sampled, Ernesto might have reached hurricane strength near North Carolina.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AnnularCane, Argcane, Cpv17, Hypercane_Kyle, IcyTundra, LAF92, skillz305, Stratton23, wzrgirl1 and 124 guests