starsfan65 wrote:When is the 0z GFS run?
The run just started. It will finish within the next hour and a half. Middle of next week and later will be within the next hour or so.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
 The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.starsfan65 wrote:When is the 0z GFS run?

I hope that 18z run was a bad run.Ntxw wrote:starsfan65 wrote:When is the 0z GFS run?
The run just started. It will finish within the next hour and a half. Middle of next week and later will be within the next hour or so.

 . 1047mb high and all higher surface heights to Mexico. It's funny. Canadian is chilly with a hard freeze/
. 1047mb high and all higher surface heights to Mexico. It's funny. Canadian is chilly with a hard freeze/
Brent wrote:snowing in Mexico on the 0z GFS while DFW Is in the mid 40s
Can't make this up


Ntxw wrote:GFS has thickness in the 530s, 850s below 0C while the surface is 50s. 1047mb high and all higher surface heights to Mexico. It's funny. Canadian is chilly with a hard freeze/



spencer817 wrote:Ntxw wrote:GFS has thickness in the 530s, 850s below 0C while the surface is 50s. 1047mb high and all higher surface heights to Mexico. It's funny. Canadian is chilly with a hard freeze/
Could the CMC be right for once?
spencer817 wrote:Ntxw wrote:GFS has thickness in the 530s, 850s below 0C while the surface is 50s. 1047mb high and all higher surface heights to Mexico. It's funny. Canadian is chilly with a hard freeze/
Could the CMC be right for once?

Brent wrote:spencer817 wrote:Ntxw wrote:GFS has thickness in the 530s, 850s below 0C while the surface is 50s. 1047mb high and all higher surface heights to Mexico. It's funny. Canadian is chilly with a hard freeze/
Could the CMC be right for once?
its usually way too cold in my experience
but maybe I guess lol
I'm having a hard time buying the GFS though... it can't snow in Mexico and be 45 here lol






Quixotic wrote:I wouldn’t fret yet. Most of the ensembles show a retrograding trough from the Midwest to the plains. Also, no matter the year, there’s always a good arctic breakout for Nina years in December.....even last year...

spencer817 wrote:Quixotic wrote:I wouldn’t fret yet. Most of the ensembles show a retrograding trough from the Midwest to the plains. Also, no matter the year, there’s always a good arctic breakout for Nina years in December.....even last year...
Wonder of the upgrade the CMC got a couple of weeks ago might help it (and us) for this pattern. IT's far fetched, but it's stayed somewhat consistent.




spencer817 wrote:This second blast signal has looked better most of the runs so far.

Brent wrote:spencer817 wrote:This second blast signal has looked better most of the runs so far.
if that was just a little faster...


spencer817 wrote:Brent wrote:spencer817 wrote:This second blast signal has looked better most of the runs so far.
if that was just a little faster...
I want snow as much as the next guy in DFW (Coppell specifically) but the last 2 years make me pessimistic.
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 344 guests