ATL: MATTHEW - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11508
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4081 Postby GCANE » Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:29 am

mrbagyo wrote:The eye is clearing once again..
Might ramp up in intensity again.
I think Matthew would regain cat 5 status today.


Looks like it is trying to get the stadium effect.
0 likes   

ronyan
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 791
Age: 39
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:46 pm
Location: Lake Jackson, TX

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4082 Postby ronyan » Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:29 am

Vdogg wrote:Why does the page graphic show Matthew as a Cat 3 when it's a Cat 4?


They need to update the range for S2K's map to reflect 130 as a cat 4, 131 used to be the minimum.
1 likes   

User avatar
JaxGator
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 780
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2016 3:33 pm
Location: Jacksonville Florida

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4083 Postby JaxGator » Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:29 am

This was posted in the model thread and um....I pray that it will NOT happen.

Michael Ventrice ‏@MJVentrice · 32m32 minutes ago  Andover, MA

Not good. This AM's ECMWF High probability cluster with a BIG statement. All members now track #Matthew into Florida at a Cat 4 intensity.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ct2RRNVWIAA42R7.jpg
0 likes   
The posts or stuff said are NOT an official forecast. Please look to the NHC and NWS for official forecasts and products.

Floyd-1999, Frances-2004, Jeanne-2004, Fay-2008, Beryl-2012, Debby-2012, Colin-2016, Hermine-2016, Julia-2016, Matthew-2016, Irma-2017, Elsa-2021, Idalia-2023, Debby-2024, Helene-2024.


Go Gators! Go Jags!

User avatar
Ntxw
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 22792
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 6:34 pm
Location: DFW, Texas

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4084 Postby Ntxw » Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:30 am

As picturesque of a storm he is, praying for all in it's path.

Image

His eye is warming meaning he should at the least maintain strength. If that warming continues then it should clear out soon
2 likes   
The above post and any post by Ntxw is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including Storm2k. For official information, please refer to NWS products.

  Help support Storm2K!
Help Support Storm2K

Vdogg
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 621
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2016 9:56 am

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4085 Postby Vdogg » Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:30 am

Alyono wrote:
DESTRUCTION5 wrote:
Alyono wrote:Today was when he models were forecasting rapid to explosive intensification. Unfortunately, instead of starting from cat 2, this process is starting from cat 4


Every wobble counts for Hati at this point. If this rolls over them as forecasted they could be thrown into the stone age. Praying at this point is an understatement.


Does not matter if they get a irect hit or not. Chances are, hurricane winds may miss them entirely

The rains, however, will not


I don't understand this statement. If they take a direct hit, that's category 4 force winds, as opposed to strong tropical storm force winds if it's a miss.
1 likes   

User avatar
JtSmarts
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1437
Age: 39
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2003 1:29 pm
Location: Columbia, South Carolina

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4086 Postby JtSmarts » Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:32 am

Brad Panovich meteorologist at WCNC Charlotte, posted this on facebook and twitter.

I noticed this morning the models are underestimating the strength of the Atlantic ridge of high pressure. It was actually stronger with the morning weather balloon launch from Bermuda. Both the GFS and ECMWF had the ridge at 588dm the sounding from Bermuda shows it at 590dm. The result is the ridge is stronger than the models thought which could mean a shift west in #Matthew s track. Stay alert! #ncwx #scwx


 https://twitter.com/wxbrad/status/782945817116016640


1 likes   

User avatar
bg1
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 409
Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 11:14 am
Location: near Santee, SC

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4087 Postby bg1 » Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:33 am

Vdogg wrote:Why does the page graphic show Matthew as a Cat 3 when it's a Cat 4?


I think when the Hurricane Scale was updated a few years back, the one the map uses wasn't. Before, The upper end of Cat 3 was 130 mph, and 115 kts (low Cat 4, Matt's current intensity) converted to 135 mph. now, the upper end of Cat 3 is 129 mph, and 115 kts (Cat 4) converts to 130 mph. I think the map still uses the old scale and goes by miles per hour first instead of knots first.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hypercane_Kyle
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3357
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:58 pm
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4088 Postby Hypercane_Kyle » Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:35 am

bg1 wrote:
Vdogg wrote:Why does the page graphic show Matthew as a Cat 3 when it's a Cat 4?


I think when the Hurricane Scale was updated a few years back, the one the map uses wasn't. Before, The upper end of Cat 3 was 130 mph, and 115 kts (low Cat 4, Matt's current intensity) converted to 135 mph. now, the upper end of Cat 3 is 129 mph, and 115 kts (Cat 4) converts to 130 mph. I think the map still uses the old scale and goes by miles per hour first instead of knots first.


It's weird but 115 knots converts both to 130mph and 135mph per the NHC.
0 likes   
My posts are my own personal opinion, defer to the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and other NOAA products for decision making during hurricane season.

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4089 Postby Alyono » Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:36 am

Vdogg wrote:
Alyono wrote:
DESTRUCTION5 wrote:
Every wobble counts for Hati at this point. If this rolls over them as forecasted they could be thrown into the stone age. Praying at this point is an understatement.


Does not matter if they get a irect hit or not. Chances are, hurricane winds may miss them entirely

The rains, however, will not


I don't understand this statement. If they take a direct hit, that's category 4 force winds, as opposed to strong tropical storm force winds if it's a miss.


Because its the rain that will kill. The rain is going to be the same regardless
1 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4090 Postby Alyono » Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:38 am

last pass through the center indicates that this is not intensifying further. Eye has also become clouded over again. Probably maintaining its intensity
0 likes   

ronyan
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 791
Age: 39
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:46 pm
Location: Lake Jackson, TX

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4091 Postby ronyan » Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:39 am

Hypercane_Kyle wrote:
bg1 wrote:
Vdogg wrote:Why does the page graphic show Matthew as a Cat 3 when it's a Cat 4?


I think when the Hurricane Scale was updated a few years back, the one the map uses wasn't. Before, The upper end of Cat 3 was 130 mph, and 115 kts (low Cat 4, Matt's current intensity) converted to 135 mph. now, the upper end of Cat 3 is 129 mph, and 115 kts (Cat 4) converts to 130 mph. I think the map still uses the old scale and goes by miles per hour first instead of knots first.


It's weird but 115 knots converts both to 130mph and 135mph per the NHC.


Should be 130 as the actual value from the conversion is 132.34. Unless you are using a ceiling function.
Last edited by ronyan on Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
bg1
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 409
Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 11:14 am
Location: near Santee, SC

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4092 Postby bg1 » Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:39 am

Hypercane_Kyle wrote:
bg1 wrote:
Vdogg wrote:Why does the page graphic show Matthew as a Cat 3 when it's a Cat 4?


I think when the Hurricane Scale was updated a few years back, the one the map uses wasn't. Before, The upper end of Cat 3 was 130 mph, and 115 kts (low Cat 4, Matt's current intensity) converted to 135 mph. now, the upper end of Cat 3 is 129 mph, and 115 kts (Cat 4) converts to 130 mph. I think the map still uses the old scale and goes by miles per hour first instead of knots first.


It's weird but 115 knots converts both to 130mph and 135mph per the NHC.


Yeah, the CPHC still uses the old scale I think.
115 knots is actually 132.34 mph, closer to 130 than 135; that's why there was a slight adjustment to the lower boundary. Same thing with the upper boundary not rounding off properly when converting to km/h.
0 likes   

AutoPenalti
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4032
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4093 Postby AutoPenalti » Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:39 am

JtSmarts wrote:Brad Panovich meteorologist at WCNC Charlotte, posted this on facebook and twitter.

I noticed this morning the models are underestimating the strength of the Atlantic ridge of high pressure. It was actually stronger with the morning weather balloon launch from Bermuda. Both the GFS and ECMWF had the ridge at 588dm the sounding from Bermuda shows it at 590dm. The result is the ridge is stronger than the models thought which could mean a shift west in #Matthew s track. Stay alert! #ncwx #scwx


 https://twitter.com/wxbrad/status/782945817116016640



So by that logic, we should be expecting more west shifts?
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.


Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)

TCVN
is a weighted averaged

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11508
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4094 Postby GCANE » Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:39 am

A new Cu-Nim just popped on the northern eyewall.
Not a sign of weakening.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ntxw
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 22792
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 6:34 pm
Location: DFW, Texas

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4095 Postby Ntxw » Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:40 am

Alyono wrote:
Vdogg wrote:
Alyono wrote:
Does not matter if they get a irect hit or not. Chances are, hurricane winds may miss them entirely

The rains, however, will not


I don't understand this statement. If they take a direct hit, that's category 4 force winds, as opposed to strong tropical storm force winds if it's a miss.


Because its the rain that will kill. The rain is going to be the same regardless


Agreed, for Haiti the bigger concern is always rainfall due to it's topography of mountains. Landslides and mudslides here often kill in greater than actual winds for a smaller area.
0 likes   
The above post and any post by Ntxw is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including Storm2k. For official information, please refer to NWS products.



  Help support Storm2K!

Help Support Storm2K


User avatar
La Sirena
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 307
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 4:02 pm
Location: Formerly of the Keys, back home in East TN

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4096 Postby La Sirena » Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:43 am

JaxGator wrote:This was posted in the model thread and um....I pray that it will NOT happen.

Michael Ventrice ‏@MJVentrice · 32m32 minutes ago  Andover, MA

Not good. This AM's ECMWF High probability cluster with a BIG statement. All members now track #Matthew into Florida at a Cat 4 intensity.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ct2RRNVWIAA42R7.jpg

I saw that on Twitter and almost dropped my coffee. :eek:

Frankly, we are getting closer to knowing a more sure outcome. The rollercoaster ride has been intense. I'm slightly scared to see the models after it comes by Cuba.

Edit: Apparently, I need more coffee.
Last edited by La Sirena on Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:48 am, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.


Hurricane Irma,Hurricane Michael, Hurricane Helene

User avatar
sponger
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1620
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 11:26 am
Location: St Augustine

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4097 Postby sponger » Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:43 am

Quite interested to see the 11 update! Track will move but by how much? May just wait for the GFS run since there is plenty of time. I will guess 50 miles west in deference to the Euro.
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
SouthDadeFish
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2835
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 2:54 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4098 Postby SouthDadeFish » Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:45 am

JtSmarts wrote:Brad Panovich meteorologist at WCNC Charlotte, posted this on facebook and twitter.

I noticed this morning the models are underestimating the strength of the Atlantic ridge of high pressure. It was actually stronger with the morning weather balloon launch from Bermuda. Both the GFS and ECMWF had the ridge at 588dm the sounding from Bermuda shows it at 590dm. The result is the ridge is stronger than the models thought which could mean a shift west in #Matthew s track. Stay alert! #ncwx #scwx


 https://twitter.com/wxbrad/status/782945817116016640




One cannot definitively come to this conclusion without looking at the raw model output. The next contour on that map is 591 dm, so theoretically the models still could have been forecasting a 500 hPa height of 590 dm. Someone pointed this out to him on Twitter as well.
1 likes   

User avatar
northjaxpro
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8900
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:21 am
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4099 Postby northjaxpro » Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:47 am

AutoPenalti wrote:
JtSmarts wrote:Brad Panovich meteorologist at WCNC Charlotte, posted this on facebook and twitter.


So by that logic, we should be expecting more west shifts?


Well, yes I would expect to see west shifts continue, especially in the 96 -120 hr period when I am anticipating the closest approach of Matthew toward the Florida East Coast.
Last edited by northjaxpro on Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
NEVER, EVER SAY NEVER in the tropics and weather in general, and most importantly, with life itself!!

________________________________________________________________________________________

Fay 2008 Beryl 2012 Debby 2012 Colin 2016 Hermine 2016 Julia 2016 Matthew 2016 Irma 2017 Dorian 2019

User avatar
1900hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6059
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2015 12:04 pm
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#4100 Postby 1900hurricane » Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:47 am

The F-18 pass from a little over two hours ago shows a large outer eyewall developing. Considering the eyewall size and the early state of eyewall replacement currently, I doubt eyewall replacement completes before landfall.

Image
0 likes   
Contract Meteorologist. TAMU & MSST. Fiercely authentic, one of a kind. We are all given free will, so choose a life meant to be lived. We are the Masters of our own Stories.
Opinions expressed are mine alone.

Follow me on Twitter at @1900hurricane : Read blogs at https://1900hurricane.wordpress.com/


Return to “2016”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests