ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION ALEX - DISCUSSION

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
TexWx
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 370
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 11:00 pm
Location: Pearland, Texas
Contact:

Re: ATL: HURRICANE ALEX - DISCUSSION

#4101 Postby TexWx » Wed Jun 30, 2010 10:20 am

My cousins live in South Padre.
They just got power back after a pretty nasty squall line.

They have closed the causeway there, so they can't leave now if they had to.
0 likes   

cwachal

#4102 Postby cwachal » Wed Jun 30, 2010 10:21 am

the inner eyewall is trying to strengthen again....
0 likes   

User avatar
txagwxman
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 960
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 3:26 pm
Location: Tomball, TX

#4103 Postby txagwxman » Wed Jun 30, 2010 10:22 am

A little jog to the NW I see...BRO may get 60-75 mph wind gusts if this continues. However, it should turn more west soon...we will see.
Last edited by txagwxman on Wed Jun 30, 2010 10:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
“If you thought that science was certain - well, that is just an error on your part.”

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re:

#4104 Postby KWT » Wed Jun 30, 2010 10:22 am

deltadog03 wrote:Hello Brownsville????


I still think a little south of Brownsville but if the NW trend carries on, then they will probably end up getting a little more then they expected last night.

LF should still occur in N.Mexico, but its going to come clsoe the populated Rio Grande general region.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: HURRICANE ALEX - DISCUSSION

#4105 Postby ROCK » Wed Jun 30, 2010 10:23 am

that plains high is not as strong as some think....couple that with this stregnthening due to land friction.....wala a more rightish track...

http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real- ... 8dlm3.html
0 likes   

User avatar
deltadog03
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3580
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: Macon, GA

#4106 Postby deltadog03 » Wed Jun 30, 2010 10:23 am

I agree KWT....but, certainly looks* to make landfall north of NHC's point....Nasty weather regardless down there.
0 likes   

User avatar
LAwxrgal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1763
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 1:05 pm
Location: Reserve, LA (30 mi west of NOLA)

Re: ATL: HURRICANE ALEX - DISCUSSION

#4107 Postby LAwxrgal » Wed Jun 30, 2010 10:26 am

With a system as big as this the exact point doesn't really matter -- still going to be pretty bad, anywhere in deep south Texas and northern Mexico. Heavy rain, gusty winds and squalls -- the norms with these.
0 likes   
Andrew 92/Isidore & Lili 02/Bill 03/Katrina & Rita 05/Gustav & Ike 08/Isaac 12 (flooded my house)/Harvey 17/Barry 19/Cristobal 20/Claudette 21/Ida 21 (In the Eye)/Francine 24
Wake me up when November ends

User avatar
tronbunny
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1558
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 1:18 am
Location: Central FL

Re: ATL: HURRICANE ALEX - DISCUSSION

#4108 Postby tronbunny » Wed Jun 30, 2010 10:27 am

TexWx wrote:My cousins live in South Padre.
They just got power back after a pretty nasty squall line.

They have closed the causeway there, so they can't leave now if they had to.


This is alarming.
So,if Alex moves right of forecast. South Padre islanders are in for a bumpy and unpleasant ride for about 24hrs.
Scratch that.. regardless, they're not going to have a nice day, at all.
:(
I don't like that S.Texas isn't more concerned about this.
0 likes   

User avatar
thetruesms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 844
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 1:14 pm
Location: Tallahasee, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: HURRICANE ALEX - DISCUSSION

#4109 Postby thetruesms » Wed Jun 30, 2010 10:29 am

ROCK wrote:that plains high is not as strong as some think....couple that with this stregnthening due to land friction.....wala a more rightish track...

http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real- ... 8dlm3.html
Given what recon has found, it might be a good idea to step up to the 300-850 layer - if anything, it strengthens that argument.

Following AFM's lead, I did a hand analysis of the 12Z 500, and the ridging just isn't buliding in very strong at all. I found evidence of very subtle troughing all the way to DRT (Del Rio, TX).
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re:

#4110 Postby KWT » Wed Jun 30, 2010 10:30 am

txagwxman wrote:A little jog to the NW I see...BRO may get 60-75 mph wind gusts if this continues. However, it should turn more west soon...we will see.


Not sure its a jog though, 6hr motion has been easily NW, indeed may even be close to NNW at times with hourly means. Of course I'd be surprised if it carried this one till landfall as well but ya just never know...

As you say they could well get som big gusts, the whole region near the border will gt big gusts and probably some very big rains given this system isn't exactly flying along at the moment.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
RachelAnna
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 106
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:38 pm
Location: Cypress, Texas

Re: ATL: HURRICANE ALEX - DISCUSSION

#4111 Postby RachelAnna » Wed Jun 30, 2010 10:30 am

Evil Jeremy wrote:
RachelAnna wrote:
TexWx wrote:By the "untrained eye" it appears that the westward movement has begun.


Weather channel just said movement at this time is North West. Interesting.

TWC is likely repeating what the official advisory says, which is indeed NW.


True...
0 likes   

User avatar
Big O
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 252
Age: 55
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2007 4:40 pm
Location: McAllen, Texas

Re:

#4112 Postby Big O » Wed Jun 30, 2010 10:31 am

AdamFirst wrote:According to Brownsville long-range radar, NW or NNW is its current heading.

It's got to turn sudden to the left now to verify the current track.

http://radar.weather.gov/radar.php?prod ... O&loop=yes


I'm not sure. It appears that it may have resumed more of a WNW movement. Anybody with better ideas correct me if I am wrong.
0 likes   

curtadams
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1122
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: Orange, California
Contact:

#4113 Postby curtadams » Wed Jun 30, 2010 10:32 am

With Alex' characteristics (large size, low pressure, long time over water), I'm concerned he's going to bring a surge far larger than people are probably expecting from his Cat 1 status. Sometimes we see surge damage in areas that didn't even see particularly bad weather (e.g. Dennis in the Big Bend area). Coastal areas of South Texas and North Mexico may be in for a nasty surprise.
0 likes   

User avatar
deltadog03
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3580
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: Macon, GA

#4114 Postby deltadog03 » Wed Jun 30, 2010 10:33 am

This was kinda my concern all along. I knew all along that the ridge wouldn't be a classic ridge coming in type deal. AFM and I were talking about this on the phone. BTW, great job to you guys who did the hand drawn H5 map this am. Anyway, the center of the ridge is up near me in WY. (prolly pushing just east of me now) The current trof over the NE is leaving and there is a trof split that looks to be occuring. As that piece comes down (very weak, but noticable) it allows for a small window for alex to climb LAT a bit. It wouldn't suprise me to see this make landfall very very near BRO...maybe BRO itself.
0 likes   

User avatar
Evil Jeremy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5463
Age: 32
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 2:10 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

#4115 Postby Evil Jeremy » Wed Jun 30, 2010 10:34 am

The 11AM advisory's upcoming 00z point for Alex was 24.1N and 96.7W. By the looks of things, Alex should reach 24.1N much sooner than that.
Last edited by Evil Jeremy on Wed Jun 30, 2010 10:36 am, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   
Frances 04 / Jeanne 04 / Katrina 05 / Wilma 05 / Fay 08 / Debby 12 / Andrea 13 / Colin 16 / Hermine 16 / Matthew 16 / Irma 17

SunnyThoughts
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2263
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 12:42 pm
Location: Pensacola, Florida

#4116 Postby SunnyThoughts » Wed Jun 30, 2010 10:35 am

DATE/TIME LAT LON CLASSIFICATION STORM
30/1145 UTC 23.6N 95.3W T5.5/5.5 ALEX
0 likes   

User avatar
Big O
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 252
Age: 55
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2007 4:40 pm
Location: McAllen, Texas

Re:

#4117 Postby Big O » Wed Jun 30, 2010 10:36 am

deltadog03 wrote:Hello Brownsville????

Please elaborate. I live in McAllen/Brownsville area, and the media was for the most part stating how we had dodged a bullet and would get nothing more than heavy rain and some gusts to tropical storm strength. Most are highly complacent.

I was exhausted yesterday and fell asleep after it appeared that Alex was moving WSW. I awake and I find out that it was a wobble, that it had moved NNW overnight, and that the European had shifted north to about 60 miles south of border.
0 likes   

User avatar
gboudx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4080
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 1:39 pm
Location: Rockwall, Tx but from Harvey, La

Re:

#4118 Postby gboudx » Wed Jun 30, 2010 10:36 am

deltadog03 wrote:This was kinda my concern all along. I knew all along that the ridge wouldn't be a classic ridge coming in type deal. AFM and I were talking about this on the phone. BTW, great job to you guys who did the hand drawn H5 map this am. Anyway, the center of the ridge is up near me in WY. (prolly pushing just east of me now) The current trof over the NE is leaving and there is a trof split that looks to be occuring. As that piece comes down (very weak, but noticable) it allows for a small window for alex to climb LAT a bit. It wouldn't suprise me to see this make landfall very very near BRO...maybe BRO itself.


And then what? Would it turn westward, or continue a more northerly component up the Rio Grande? Models have it going into the northern Mexico mountains, but a further north track could have large implications for more parts of Texas than currently forecasted.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: Re:

#4119 Postby KWT » Wed Jun 30, 2010 10:36 am

Big O wrote:
AdamFirst wrote:According to Brownsville long-range radar, NW or NNW is its current heading.

It's got to turn sudden to the left now to verify the current track.

http://radar.weather.gov/radar.php?prod ... O&loop=yes


I'm not sure. It appears that it may have resumed more of a WNW movement. Anybody with better ideas correct me if I am wrong.


I think your just seeing the convection suddenly beed up and expand as the system gets closer to the radar site...to me following the whole thing looks like its almost exactly NW at the moment.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

Re: ATL: HURRICANE ALEX - DISCUSSION

#4120 Postby HouTXmetro » Wed Jun 30, 2010 10:37 am

thetruesms wrote:
ROCK wrote:that plains high is not as strong as some think....couple that with this stregnthening due to land friction.....wala a more rightish track...

http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real- ... 8dlm3.html
Given what recon has found, it might be a good idea to step up to the 300-850 layer - if anything, it strengthens that argument.

Following AFM's lead, I did a hand analysis of the 12Z 500, and the ridging just isn't buliding in very strong at all. I found evidence of very subtle troughing all the way to DRT (Del Rio, TX).


I noticed that yesterday based on the WV images...not that it's changed the forecast but noone else seemed to listen.
0 likes   
[Disclaimer: My Amateur Opinion, please defer to your local authorities or the NHC for Guidance.]


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests