chris_fit wrote:I knew this was a discussion by Forecaster Stewart even without looking at the bottom - Love his discussions.
He's a blast to talk tropical meteorology with. One of my favorite things this summer was chatting with him.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
chris_fit wrote:I knew this was a discussion by Forecaster Stewart even without looking at the bottom - Love his discussions.
chaser1 wrote:I don't think 99L warranted the designation of depression when it did. I don't think we're seeing any level of organization at this point that would better make the case for it being a depression than we've seen at at least one or two previous junctures during this systems life-span. Thats not to say that things will not change, but thus far the shear and/or dry air have not.
RL3AO wrote:chris_fit wrote:I knew this was a discussion by Forecaster Stewart even without looking at the bottom - Love his discussions.
He's a blast to talk tropical meteorology with. One of my favorite things this summer was chatting with him.
Aric Dunn wrote:oh look irregardless of the new data .. the models are the same.. only slight track and speed differences. overall thinking the same.. hwrf can not be throw out.. its been nearly 3 days of the same solution..
Kingarabian wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:oh look irregardless of the new data .. the models are the same.. only slight track and speed differences. overall thinking the same.. hwrf can not be throw out.. its been nearly 3 days of the same solution..
Aric, I think the HWRF can definitely be thrown out. I remember it repeatedly showing Hurricane Kilo hitting Hawaii as a cat.5 last year. Showed it for 72 hours. Never materialized.
Aric Dunn wrote:Kingarabian wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:oh look irregardless of the new data .. the models are the same.. only slight track and speed differences. overall thinking the same.. hwrf can not be throw out.. its been nearly 3 days of the same solution..
Aric, I think the HWRF can definitely be thrown out. I remember it repeatedly showing Hurricane Kilo hitting Hawaii as a cat.5 last year. Showed it for 72 hours. Never materialized.
re read the discussion..
also even the gfdl has now for two runs deepened despite the issues the global models are "possibly" showing. also the hwrf and gfdl have been on both sides sometimes they show nothing and it turns out to be a major impact and other times it they show a major impact and nothing happens... and well a lot of the times they are fairly close.. the fact that all the models have given (on more than one occasion) a very strong system gives credence to the models that have been very consistent with a stronger system. just 2 days ago the euro had run after run of a cat 3 into the SAME AREA. its completely plausible.
Blinhart wrote:Is the center even still North of Cuba or has it moved South of Cuba?
Hammy wrote:Blinhart wrote:Is the center even still North of Cuba or has it moved South of Cuba?
Doesn't even look closed based on latest data--I think NHC was premature in upgrading this and it doesn't even qualify at the moment, and honestly I don't think it did earlier today either.
Hammy wrote:Blinhart wrote:Is the center even still North of Cuba or has it moved South of Cuba?
Doesn't even look closed based on latest data--I think NHC was premature in upgrading this and it doesn't even qualify at the moment, and honestly I don't think it did earlier today either.
Alyono wrote:looking at satellite, the low does look better defined
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 149 guests