miamicanes177 wrote:We have some saying this is a wave with no closed circulation and others saying it is still closed. So which is it?
LOL..Depends who you ask..
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Canelaw99 wrote:I'm gonna post this here since it goes along with my snippet a couple of posts ago, and it's more likely to be seen in here:sunnyday wrote:In reading the update, a mention is made that the Keys and So. Fla. should keep an eye on Chris. Isn't the path over Cuba ow? If its winds are only 35 and it is virtually dissipated, why should we keep an eye on it?
Thanks for your replies.
sunnyday wrote:In reading the update, a mention is made that the Keys and So. Fla. should keep an eye on Chris. Isn't the path over Cuba ow? If its winds are only 35 and it is virtually dissipated, why should we keep an eye on it?
Thanks for your replies.
jschlitz wrote:OK, question about the infrared:
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/loop-avn.html
-- It looks like a boundry (I thought it was shear) moves SW through the system and as it passes the core, the convection seems to fire along the boundry as it moves SW 'through' Chris as if some convergence is taking place. What's up wit' 'dat? I don't think I've seen that before in a TC.
Stratosphere747 wrote:Canelaw99 wrote:I'm gonna post this here since it goes along with my snippet a couple of posts ago, and it's more likely to be seen in here:sunnyday wrote:In reading the update, a mention is made that the Keys and So. Fla. should keep an eye on Chris. Isn't the path over Cuba ow? If its winds are only 35 and it is virtually dissipated, why should we keep an eye on it?
Thanks for your replies.
Just in case conditions change....
sunnyday wrote:In reading the update, a mention is made that the Keys and So. Fla. should keep an eye on Chris. Isn't the path over Cuba ow? If its winds are only 35 and it is virtually dissipated, why should we keep an eye on it?
Thanks for your replies.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests