ATL: IKE Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
robbielyn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1298
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 9:45 am
Location: brooksville, fl

Re: Re:

#4961 Postby robbielyn » Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:09 pm

fasterdisaster wrote:
wxman57 wrote:
fasterdisaster wrote:He's also not going to move inland for another 4 hours so I don't see him weakening until then.


NHC just put out a special statement saying Ike has made landfall. The surface center is near the southwest side of the eye on satellite.


Are you sure it's there because I think that image is from over half an hour ago and radar doesn't show that. I also think he's moving a tad north of west right now so that will stop him from moving inland IMO.

what sat pic are you looking at? You can see where the eyewall is partially inland.
0 likes   

User avatar
Vortex
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4644
Age: 53
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2003 9:34 pm
Location: Hilton Head, SC

#4962 Postby Vortex » Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:11 pm

The small resort area of guardalavaca will take a direct hit with the strong N/NE causing a surge over the entire resort. Google earth it and you'll see what i mean. This is the worst case scenario for this town.
0 likes   

jacindc
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 79
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2003 8:38 pm
Location: Capitol Hill, DC

Re: Re:

#4963 Postby jacindc » Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:13 pm

fasterdisaster wrote:Are you sure it's there because I think that image is from over half an hour ago and radar doesn't show that. I also think he's moving a tad north of west right now so that will stop him from moving inland IMO.


It's generally a good idea to not question whether a storm has made landfall once the NHC has sent out a landfall statement. :)
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL IKE: Category 3 - Discussion

#4964 Postby Sanibel » Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:14 pm

A lengthwise track of a strong hurricane will strip Cuba of economically important crops like tobacco and sugar cane.
0 likes   

fasterdisaster
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1868
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:41 pm
Location: Miami, Florida

Re: Re:

#4965 Postby fasterdisaster » Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:15 pm

robbielyn wrote:
fasterdisaster wrote:He's also not going to move inland for another 4 hours so I don't see him weakening until then.


he already made landfall so what do you mean? he's going to hang on the coast for a while?


Yeah because looking at the coastline he went on a small piece of land that 'juts out' from the rest of the coast and since he is moving at about 275 he will hug the coastline for a good 4 hours I think.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22980
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL IKE: Category 3 - Discussion

#4966 Postby wxman57 » Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:15 pm

DESTRUCTION5 wrote:
wxman57 wrote:00Z plots. Pretty good consensus on Matagorda Bay to mid LA coast:

http://myweb.cableone.net/nolasue/IkeModels.gif



Whats in the gulf? Imaginary Water counties? :lol:


You're obviously not familiar with the offshore lease areas. Those pink areas are all offshore drilling lease areas. Tens of thousands of people work out there in the path of Ike. For example, GC = Green Canyon, MC = Mississippi Canyon, GA = Galveston, etc. Inside each pink area are hundreds of smaller lease blocks.
0 likes   

Bon
Tropical Wave
Tropical Wave
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 1:48 pm

Re: ATL IKE: Category 3 - Discussion

#4967 Postby Bon » Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:15 pm

Man, Ike's got some rough mountains ahead..gonna be a very rough ride
0 likes   

fasterdisaster
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1868
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:41 pm
Location: Miami, Florida

Re: Re:

#4968 Postby fasterdisaster » Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:16 pm

jacindc wrote:
fasterdisaster wrote:Are you sure it's there because I think that image is from over half an hour ago and radar doesn't show that. I also think he's moving a tad north of west right now so that will stop him from moving inland IMO.


It's generally a good idea to not question whether a storm has made landfall once the NHC has sent out a landfall statement. :)


Come on people. What don't you get? I'm not arguing that he has not made landfall, there is a difference between 'onshore' and 'inland' and storms can usually maintain intensity if they are in an otherwise favorable environment and merely hugging the coastline.
0 likes   

User avatar
HarlequinBoy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1400
Age: 34
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 1:57 am
Location: Memphis

Re: ATL IKE: Category 3 - Discussion

#4969 Postby HarlequinBoy » Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:16 pm

wxman57 wrote:00Z plots. Pretty good consensus on Matagorda Bay to mid LA coast:

Image


The Golden Triangle must be groaning.
0 likes   

Wx_Warrior
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Category 3 - Discussion

#4970 Postby Wx_Warrior » Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:18 pm

Everyone on the Texas coast is...OT, BTW, is that the infamous jonas bros on your avatar?
0 likes   

User avatar
JtSmarts
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1437
Age: 39
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2003 1:29 pm
Location: Columbia, South Carolina

Re: ATL IKE: Category 3 - Discussion

#4971 Postby JtSmarts » Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:19 pm

carversteve wrote:Ok..i gotta ask...how in the world can Ike survive a trip through all of cuba and come back to hit the gulf coast as a hurricane?? Will he or could he just dissipate over cuba? Look what happened to Gustav with just a little land interaction.(No bashing please...just curious)


There are factors to take into account such as exactly how long he spends over land, the terrain of the land, and the upper atmosphere conditions. One of Gustav's biggest problems was the shear along with land interaction. It seems Ike will have much better conditions than Gustav to work with. I hope that helps some. :)
0 likes   

User avatar
DESTRUCTION5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4423
Age: 43
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:25 am
Location: Stuart, FL

Re: ATL IKE: Category 3 - Discussion

#4972 Postby DESTRUCTION5 » Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:19 pm

wxman57 wrote:
DESTRUCTION5 wrote:
wxman57 wrote:00Z plots. Pretty good consensus on Matagorda Bay to mid LA coast:

http://myweb.cableone.net/nolasue/IkeModels.gif



Whats in the gulf? Imaginary Water counties? :lol:


You're obviously not familiar with the offshore lease areas. Those pink areas are all offshore drilling lease areas. Tens of thousands of people work out there in the path of Ike. For example, GC = Green Canyon, MC = Mississippi Canyon, GA = Galveston, etc. Inside each pink area are hundreds of smaller lease blocks.



No figured it had something to do with oil and ur clients..Was joking really...
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145455
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL IKE: Category 3 - Discussion

#4973 Postby cycloneye » Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:21 pm

WTNT64 KNHC 080149
TCUAT4
HURRICANE IKE TROPICAL CYCLONE UPDATE
NWS TPC/NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL AL092008
950 PM EDT SUN SEP 07 2008

...IKE MAKES LANDFALL IN EASTERN CUBA...

THE EYE OF HURRICANE IKE MADE LANDFALL ON THE NORTH COAST OF EASTERN
CUBA IN THE PROVINCE OF HOLGUIN...NEAR PUNTO DE SAMA AROUND 0945 PM
EDT...0145 UTC. MAXIMUM WINDS AT LANDFALL WERE ESTIMATED TO BE 125
MPH...205 KM/HR.

$$
FORECASTER PASCH/KIMBERLAIN
0 likes   

User avatar
HarlequinBoy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1400
Age: 34
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 1:57 am
Location: Memphis

Re: ATL IKE: Category 3 - Discussion

#4974 Postby HarlequinBoy » Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:21 pm

Wx_Warrior wrote:Everyone on the Texas coast is...OT, BTW, is that the infamous jonas bros on your avatar?


Yeah, I imagine so.

No, lol. It's the Gossip Girl cast. I did just watch them perform on the MTV VMAs though. (Sorry for the OT)
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthFLTropics
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4236
Age: 50
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 8:04 am
Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida

Re: ATL IKE: Category 3 - Discussion

#4975 Postby SouthFLTropics » Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:25 pm

HarlequinBoy wrote:
wxman57 wrote:00Z plots. Pretty good consensus on Matagorda Bay to mid LA coast:

Image


The Golden Triangle must be groaning.


All of us are going to be groaning some more soon...At the gas pump! :double:

SFT
0 likes   

User avatar
stormspotter
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 68
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 8:34 am
Location: Mobile, Al.

#4976 Postby stormspotter » Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:25 pm

I am truely sorry that Texas and possibly Louisiana has to possibly take on a potentially damaging storm. Its not looking good for you guys. The NHC has been so good with their track record, I'm afraid preparations are in your best interest. Our thoughts and prayers are with you.
0 likes   

User avatar
bahamaswx
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1542
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2003 1:11 am
Location: Georgetown, Bahamas

#4977 Postby bahamaswx » Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:26 pm

Why does everyone keep saying this is Ike's 2nd landfall? IIRC the eye passed directly over Grand Turk and Great Inagua, making this his 3rd landfall.
0 likes   

BigB0882
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2284
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 12:08 am
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Contact:

#4978 Postby BigB0882 » Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:29 pm

My mom was joking that last time it was Katrina for Louisiana and Rita for Texas (although, wasn't that technically a LA landfall? Oh well, she lives in Beaumont so to her it was a Texas storm) so since Louisiana had Gustav it would be Texas getting a big one soon. I hope she isn't right but Louisiana doesn't want yet another one. If this one hits around Cameron then it will be quite ironic.
0 likes   

User avatar
Vortex
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4644
Age: 53
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2003 9:34 pm
Location: Hilton Head, SC

#4979 Postby Vortex » Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:32 pm

This looks to become a very large and intense hurricane for the upper texas coast..Look out houston/galveston!!
0 likes   

User avatar
Sabanic
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 683
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 7:01 am
Location: Mobile, AL
Contact:

Re:

#4980 Postby Sabanic » Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:32 pm

stormspotter wrote:I am truely sorry that Texas and possibly Louisiana has to possibly take on a potentially damaging storm. Its not looking good for you guys. The NHC has been so good with their track record, I'm afraid preparations are in your best interest. Our thoughts and prayers are with you.


I feel the same way, but geez what is up with people conceding that Ike is definitely going to a certain location so far out? Just don't get caught with your pants down in case.
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests