ATL: INVEST 95L - DISCUSSION

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
CYCLONE MIKE
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2183
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 6:04 pm
Location: Gonzales, LA

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - DISCUSSION

#541 Postby CYCLONE MIKE » Mon Jul 05, 2010 7:59 pm

tailgator,
better hurry and rush to your final preparations before we get smacked by the RFQ. I am putting the final boards up right now. :cheesy: Looks to be only a couple of hours away before we get into some the the heavier rain that should last all night. Do have to agree with most others saying this was at least a depression before making landfall. Even our 6 o'clock weatherman said the NHC left him scratching his head over what transpired earlier this afternoon. Also believed it should of been declared a depression upon making landfall and another few hours of water and it would have been Bonnie.
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#542 Postby RL3AO » Mon Jul 05, 2010 7:59 pm

Oh that crazy NHC. :lol:

I have no proof, I'm just throwing this out there. I wonder if politics were involved. If they take a single thunderstorm TC and call it Bonnie right near the oil spill, there is massive media over reaction and headaches all around. I could easily be wrong. Just throwing it out there.
0 likes   

User avatar
tailgater
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3339
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 9:13 pm
Location: St. Amant La.

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - DISCUSSION

#543 Postby tailgater » Mon Jul 05, 2010 8:00 pm

Nice catch Cycloneye, this one has been a little strange and if there is proof of a LLC, which it certainly looked like on the visible loops, then i think they will classify it. Plus it still looks like on radar as if isn't on shore yet and has a somewhat better appearance. It's just a little baby. :roll:
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - DISCUSSION

#544 Postby wxman57 » Mon Jul 05, 2010 8:07 pm

Surface obs still don't confirm an LLC. They do show a trof axis. Could be the circulation was mid-level.
0 likes   

User avatar
MGC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5899
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2003 9:05 pm
Location: Pass Christian MS, or what is left.

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - DISCUSSION

#545 Postby MGC » Mon Jul 05, 2010 8:07 pm

Oh well, on to the next system......personally, I think 95L was a tiny TD. But, since I don't run the NHC......MGC
0 likes   

User avatar
tailgater
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3339
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 9:13 pm
Location: St. Amant La.

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - DISCUSSION

#546 Postby tailgater » Mon Jul 05, 2010 8:12 pm

wxman57 wrote:Surface obs still don't confirm an LLC. They do show a trof axis. Could be the circulation was mid-level.

My thoughts also MLC, that's why it went n then nw and now west.
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11161
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - DISCUSSION

#547 Postby Ivanhater » Mon Jul 05, 2010 8:13 pm

Image
0 likes   
Michael

redfish1
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 125
Age: 44
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 9:24 pm
Location: Port Arthur, Tx

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - DISCUSSION

#548 Postby redfish1 » Mon Jul 05, 2010 8:15 pm

Ivanhater wrote:Image


so is the center of circulation still over water and is it moving west now??
0 likes   

User avatar
vbhoutex
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 29112
Age: 73
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
Location: Cypress, TX
Contact:

Re:

#549 Postby vbhoutex » Mon Jul 05, 2010 8:18 pm

RL3AO wrote:Oh that crazy NHC. :lol:

I have no proof, I'm just throwing this out there. I wonder if politics were involved. If they take a single thunderstorm TC and call it Bonnie right near the oil spill, there is massive media over reaction and headaches all around. I could easily be wrong. Just throwing it out there.

I have to disagree with this. I have already seen huge overreaction, imo, to this system. NBC news tonight stated, and I am quoting as best I can remember, "a very strong storm is moving onshore in Southern LA...". I'm sorry, but a low end TS, if indeed it is one, is not a very strong storm no matter how you paint it. We have tstorms stronger than this quite often all across the South. As far as whether NHC should have named this system, I have to defer to their knowledge and available information, which is much more than anything we have available, except for maybe our pro-mets. My biggest concern now is the fact that this system is shown by most models to be headed WNW to NW in our general direction and this area of TX does not need any more heavy rains any time soon. Whether it is named won't change any of that. JMHO.
0 likes   
Skywarn, C.E.R.T.
Please click below to donate to STORM2K to help with the expenses of keeping the site going:
Image

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - DISCUSSION

#550 Postby ozonepete » Mon Jul 05, 2010 8:26 pm

The radar and satellite seem to indicate the center is still over water.
0 likes   

User avatar
tailgater
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3339
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 9:13 pm
Location: St. Amant La.

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - DISCUSSION

#551 Postby tailgater » Mon Jul 05, 2010 8:29 pm

so is the center of circulation still over water and is it moving west now??
I was referring to what I think was a MLC moving west. but I'm just a gawker with too much time on his hands right now.
This is about 7 hours old so don't jump me about what it shows.
Image
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - DISCUSSION

#552 Postby ozonepete » Mon Jul 05, 2010 8:48 pm

00Z HPC surface analysis has it over water.

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
KFDM Meteorologist
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 1314
Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 9:52 pm
Location: Upper Texas Coast/Orange County

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - DISCUSSION

#553 Postby KFDM Meteorologist » Mon Jul 05, 2010 9:14 pm

0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#554 Postby HURAKAN » Mon Jul 05, 2010 9:14 pm

Best Track confirms they missed this one. If they did it with Arthur? Why not do it again. 2010 and we don't get consistency.
0 likes   

User avatar
Tireman4
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5853
Age: 59
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 1:08 pm
Location: Humble, Texas
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - DISCUSSION

#555 Postby Tireman4 » Mon Jul 05, 2010 9:17 pm

Ok, I have to say this. In my unprofessional opinion ( I am just a lowly community college historian...almost PhD...in 1.5 years...LOL) this system is weird. I am just at a loss for words to say.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
0 likes   

User avatar
KFDM Meteorologist
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 1314
Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 9:52 pm
Location: Upper Texas Coast/Orange County

#556 Postby KFDM Meteorologist » Mon Jul 05, 2010 9:20 pm

ROPICAL WEATHER OUTLOOK
NWS TPC/NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL
800 PM EDT MON JUL 5 2010

FOR THE NORTH ATLANTIC...CARIBBEAN SEA AND THE GULF OF MEXICO...

A SMALL LOW PRESSURE SYSTEM HAS MOVED INLAND OVER SOUTH-CENTRAL
LOUISIANA ABOUT 25 MILES SOUTHEAST OF MORGAN CITY. NOW THAT THE
SYSTEM IS OVER LAND AND WILL MOVE FARTHER INLAND TONIGHT...TROPICAL
CYCLONE DEVELOPMENT IS NO LONGER EXPECTED.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11161
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - DISCUSSION

#557 Postby Ivanhater » Mon Jul 05, 2010 9:23 pm

JimCantore

Invest 95L HASN'T come COMPLETELY onshore yet. It's trying to slowly organize south of Morgan City, LA. Could be interesting.....
0 likes   
Michael

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#558 Postby HURAKAN » Mon Jul 05, 2010 9:27 pm

Image

Looks to be offshore
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11161
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - DISCUSSION

#559 Postby Ivanhater » Mon Jul 05, 2010 9:30 pm

Still offshore and looks to be organizing

Image
0 likes   
Michael

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#560 Postby HURAKAN » Mon Jul 05, 2010 9:31 pm

You have to give credit to 95L. Until today never got more than a 20% chance for development and almost everything was against it, but it was still able to become a depression or storm.
0 likes   


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests