MrJames wrote:Alyono wrote:MET OFFICE TROPICAL CYCLONE GUIDANCE FOR NORTH-EAST PACIFIC AND ATLANTIC
GLOBAL MODEL DATA TIME 1200UTC 04.09.2017
HURRICANE IRMA ANALYSED POSITION : 16.7N 52.7W
ATCF IDENTIFIER : AL112017
LEAD CENTRAL MAXIMUM WIND
VERIFYING TIME TIME POSITION PRESSURE (MB) SPEED (KNOTS)
-------------- ---- -------- ------------- -------------
1200UTC 04.09.2017 0 16.7N 52.7W 965 69
0000UTC 05.09.2017 12 16.3N 54.8W 968 75
1200UTC 05.09.2017 24 16.2N 57.2W 963 80
0000UTC 06.09.2017 36 16.6N 59.3W 963 73
1200UTC 06.09.2017 48 17.3N 61.7W 961 78
0000UTC 07.09.2017 60 18.0N 64.3W 958 78
1200UTC 07.09.2017 72 18.6N 67.0W 949 90
0000UTC 08.09.2017 84 19.2N 69.4W 949 83
1200UTC 08.09.2017 96 19.5N 72.4W 979 62
0000UTC 09.09.2017 108 19.8N 74.5W 970 67
1200UTC 09.09.2017 120 20.5N 76.6W 964 60
0000UTC 10.09.2017 132 21.3N 78.1W 962 68
1200UTC 10.09.2017 144 22.6N 78.8W 945 83
Mapped it via Google. UKMet sticking with the shredder run.
Goodness gracious, you want to talk about a game of inches. GFS and UK are in a sense not too dissimilar, but that one degree or so of latitude - but what a difference that degree makes! The Gfs brings into FL a catastrophic monster, the Uk, likely a mere annoyance. If but for the Greater Antilles, we'd be saying both models are in general agreement, with things looking grim for FL. Instead Hispaniola may face a catastrophe, saving one for the US













 
 










 )
)