ATL: LAURA - Post-Tropical - Discussion
Moderator: S2k Moderators
-
- Tropical Storm
- Posts: 151
- Age: 22
- Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2020 6:19 pm
- Location: Fort Lauderdale
Re: ATL: LAURA - Hurricane - Discussion
If I had a shot everytime I hear about a potential EWRC I'd have blood in my alcohol system
30 likes
- Cunxi Huang
- Category 1
- Posts: 329
- Age: 27
- Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2013 12:17 pm
- Location: San Jose, CA
- Contact:
Re: ATL: LAURA - Hurricane - Discussion
cfisher wrote:Lightning still occurring in the eyewall. It's nowhere near its peak IMO, but I could be wrong.
You ain't wrong.
https://twitter.com/CharlieFurWx/status/1298724004727947266
1 likes
06 SuTY SAOMAI | 09 TY LINFA | 10 TY FANAPI | 10 SuTY MEGI | 16 SuTY MERANTI | 19 SuTY LEKIMA | 24 C2 FRANCINE
DO NOT use my posts for life and death decisions. For official information, please refer to products from your RSMC and national weather agency.
DO NOT use my posts for life and death decisions. For official information, please refer to products from your RSMC and national weather agency.
Re: ATL: LAURA - Hurricane - Discussion
TheHurricaneGod wrote:If I had a shot everytime I hear about a potential EWRC I'd have blood in my alcohol system
We would all like to see an EWRC I think because it would cause her to lose some of her wind speed and with her being so close to land would have trouble regaining it, but I just don't see it happening.
1 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
- Blown Away
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 10145
- Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am
Re: ATL: LAURA - Hurricane - Discussion

Very low dense area along the coast, but many folks going to lose a lot of property and hopefully not their lives.
1 likes
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05... EYE COMING MY WAY IN 2024…
Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…
Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…
Re: ATL: LAURA - Hurricane - Discussion
Blinhart wrote:TheHurricaneGod wrote:If I had a shot everytime I hear about a potential EWRC I'd have blood in my alcohol system
We would all like to see an EWRC I think because it would cause her to lose some of her wind speed and with her being so close to land would have trouble regaining it, but I just don't see it happening.
I disagree. An ERWC would increase RMW and potentially worsen surge
2 likes
Re: ATL: LAURA - Hurricane - Discussion
Blown Away wrote:https://i.imgur.com/3EdEJoG.jpg
Very low dense area along the coast, but many folks going to lose a lot of property and hopefully not their lives.
And I'm probably going to lose a lot of my crabbing grounds.
1 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: LAURA - Hurricane - Discussion
Beef Stew wrote:Blinhart wrote:The question is will they go with 150 in the next 20 minutes and predict a Cat 5 landfall.
Doubtful; they'll probably bump it up to 145 with possibly 150 being the landfall intensity.
nailed it
1 likes
Very useful information on the Dvorak Technique --
https://severe.worldweather.wmo.int/TCF ... kBeven.pdf
https://severe.worldweather.wmo.int/TCF ... kBeven.pdf
Re: ATL: LAURA - Hurricane - Discussion
Cat 4? Cat 5? It really doesn't matter at this point. There will be catastrophic damage caused by Laura, my thoughts and prayers out to all in her path.
If you're thinking about riding this out, you've still got a window to leave. I faced this decision 15 years ago to this date, and I left, and am glad I did.
If you're thinking about riding this out, you've still got a window to leave. I faced this decision 15 years ago to this date, and I left, and am glad I did.
9 likes
The above post and any post by dhweather is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to NWS products.
- Hurrilurker
- Category 2
- Posts: 719
- Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 3:32 pm
- Location: San Francisco, CA
Re: ATL: LAURA - Hurricane - Discussion
Blinhart wrote:Blown Away wrote:https://i.imgur.com/3EdEJoG.jpg
Very low dense area along the coast, but many folks going to lose a lot of property and hopefully not their lives.
And I'm probably going to lose a lot of my crabbing grounds.
You might have all new crabbing grounds.
6 likes
Re: ATL: LAURA - Hurricane - Discussion
4:00 PM CDT Wed Aug 26
Location: 27.9°N 92.8°W
Moving: NW at 15 mph
Min pressure: 947 mb
Max sustained: 145 mph
Location: 27.9°N 92.8°W
Moving: NW at 15 mph
Min pressure: 947 mb
Max sustained: 145 mph
0 likes
Re: ATL: LAURA - Hurricane - Discussion
4:00 PM CDT Wed Aug 26
Location: 27.9°N 92.8°W
Moving: NW at 15 mph
Min pressure: 947 mb
Max sustained: 145 mph
Location: 27.9°N 92.8°W
Moving: NW at 15 mph
Min pressure: 947 mb
Max sustained: 145 mph
0 likes
- AnnularCane
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 2859
- Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 9:18 am
- Location: Wytheville, VA
Re: ATL: LAURA - Hurricane - Discussion
Blown Away wrote:https://i.imgur.com/JRilLlQ.gif
NNW turn pretty clear.
On visible she actually looks kind of serene.
1 likes
Re: ATL: LAURA - Hurricane - Discussion
The difference between 150 mph and 160 is actually huge in terms of kinetic energy...
4 likes
- Hurrilurker
- Category 2
- Posts: 719
- Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 3:32 pm
- Location: San Francisco, CA
Re: ATL: LAURA - Hurricane - Discussion
Beef Stew wrote:Blinhart wrote:The question is will they go with 150 in the next 20 minutes and predict a Cat 5 landfall.
Doubtful; they'll probably bump it up to 145 with possibly 150 being the landfall intensity.
Exactly what happened.
1 likes
Re: ATL: LAURA - Hurricane - Discussion
HWRF forecast from 2 days ago vs reality




12 likes
Very useful information on the Dvorak Technique --
https://severe.worldweather.wmo.int/TCF ... kBeven.pdf
https://severe.worldweather.wmo.int/TCF ... kBeven.pdf
Re: ATL: LAURA - Hurricane - Discussion
Blown Away wrote:https://i.imgur.com/3EdEJoG.jpg
Very low dense area along the coast, but many folks going to lose a lot of property and hopefully not their lives.
The unfortunate situation Lake Charles has is that there are no levees unlike New Orleans, only a very low natural elevation in certain areas of the city.

All that marshland to their south will be like the gulf and I doubt Laura will loose much strength until it reaches I-10.
2 likes
Re: ATL: LAURA - Hurricane - Discussion
Beef Stew wrote:4:00 PM CDT Wed Aug 26
Location: 27.9°N 92.8°W
Moving: NW at 15 mph
Min pressure: 947 mb
Max sustained: 145 mph
I have to admit I didn't really think Laura would become quite as powerful as it is, really rather scary and impressive at the same time.
8 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
Re: ATL: LAURA - Hurricane - Discussion
Still NW.
0 likes
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: LAURA - Hurricane - Discussion
In the discussion they mention Laura still having another 12 hours prior to landfall, so the timeframe is a little later now
1 likes
Re: ATL: LAURA - Hurricane - Discussion
Blinhart wrote:TheHurricaneGod wrote:If I had a shot everytime I hear about a potential EWRC I'd have blood in my alcohol system
We would all like to see an EWRC I think because it would cause her to lose some of her wind speed and with her being so close to land would have trouble regaining it, but I just don't see it happening.
An EWRC is the last thing the Gulf coast needs, it would expand the wind radii and cause an even more catastrophic storm surge.
The cloud tops of the west quad are cooling, looks like a sub-935mb hurricane based on IR appearance. I can't believe its 946mb, doesn't seem right for a Gulf TC like this one. Are the estimates pre-sonde in recon always lower for pressure? What is the deal with that anyways?
1 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest