ATL: MATTHEW - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Medtronic15
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 53
Age: 44
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2016 5:25 am
Location: Texas,USA

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#641 Postby Medtronic15 » Tue Sep 27, 2016 11:22 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:last hour or so looks like a low level circ is taking shape roughly here with the recent convection building. the MLC is to the NE but not far.

recon takes off in soon at least according to the plan of the day. if they canceled it then it was not mentioned. if so the not 930Z take off is next one.

http://www.nhc.noaa.go


Image


Maybe here?

Image
1 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#642 Postby Aric Dunn » Tue Sep 27, 2016 11:27 pm

Medtronic15 wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:last hour or so looks like a low level circ is taking shape roughly here with the recent convection building. the MLC is to the NE but not far.

recon takes off in soon at least according to the plan of the day. if they canceled it then it was not mentioned. if so the not 930Z take off is next one.

http://www.nhc.noaa.go


[img]http://s16.postimg.org/74lkpo6ud/rgb0_lalo.gif[/mg]


Maybe here?

Image


it is possible there is something under the MLC there is no way to confirm without recon or some good surface obs. from satellite analysis only evidence is from the low level flow. like I mentioned it will all depend where any convection persists.

thats also from 4 hours ago..

that and in that image there are three separate vorts.. anyone could take over.
1 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
JtSmarts
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1437
Age: 39
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2003 1:29 pm
Location: Columbia, South Carolina

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#643 Postby JtSmarts » Tue Sep 27, 2016 11:41 pm

Posting here not to clutter the model thread. GFS is fast, only about a week away from impact at the earliest. Verbatim shows a NC hit on next Thursday but it's at FL's latitude by 0z on Wednesday.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7351
Age: 45
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#644 Postby Hurricaneman » Tue Sep 27, 2016 11:56 pm

The center is at 55.7W 12.8N
0 likes   

SeGaBob

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#645 Postby SeGaBob » Tue Sep 27, 2016 11:58 pm

Hurricaneman wrote:The center is at 55.7W 12.8N


Good rotation there anyway
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#646 Postby Aric Dunn » Wed Sep 28, 2016 12:05 am

SeGaBob wrote:
Hurricaneman wrote:The center is at 55.7W 12.8N


Good rotation there anyway


thats all in the midlevels. looks at the low level flow. the light grey clouds.


http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/floater ... -long.html
1 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#647 Postby Alyono » Wed Sep 28, 2016 12:07 am

anything at the low levels may be as far west as 58W
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#648 Postby Aric Dunn » Wed Sep 28, 2016 12:09 am

Alyono wrote:anything at the low levels may be as far west as 58W


agreed. low level vorticity is not under MLC. things are likely to quickly change over the next 6 to 12 hours.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

WeatherEmperor
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4806
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 2:54 pm
Location: South Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#649 Postby WeatherEmperor » Wed Sep 28, 2016 12:10 am

Aric Dunn wrote:
Alyono wrote:anything at the low levels may be as far west as 58W


agreed. low level vorticity is not under MLC. things are likely to quickly change over the next 6 to 12 hours.


In what ways??


Sent from my iPhone 6 using Tapatalk
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#650 Postby Alyono » Wed Sep 28, 2016 12:16 am

looks like there may be 20 kts of shear over this, mainly due to very fast low level easterlies.

This was not supposed to happen
1 likes   

WeatherEmperor
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4806
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 2:54 pm
Location: South Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#651 Postby WeatherEmperor » Wed Sep 28, 2016 12:18 am

Alyono wrote:looks like there may be 20 kts of shear over this, mainly due to very fast low level easterlies.

This was not supposed to happen


Yeah but you forget this is 2016. It would shock us all if it didnt happen.


Sent from my iPhone 6 using Tapatalk
2 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#652 Postby Aric Dunn » Wed Sep 28, 2016 12:24 am

WeatherEmperor wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:
Alyono wrote:anything at the low levels may be as far west as 58W


agreed. low level vorticity is not under MLC. things are likely to quickly change over the next 6 to 12 hours.


In what ways??


Sent from my iPhone 6 using Tapatalk


In terms of convection. there is a large amount of rotational energy in the low to mid levels which has yet to work to the surface fully but with every convective burst we get vort after vort develop an die at the surface adding the energy. I like to call it "bottoming out" the fluid mechanics of it ( dealing with maximum rotational energy within a fairly diffuse fluid ) where due to pressure and density cause the left side or lower pressures to "pile" up on the southern portion of the vorticity forcing the eastern side to accelerate to the north then west further transferring energy ( assuming convection is present to intern transfer the energy to the surface). kind like if you were holding a rope at one end and someone was hold the other end and you both were spinning around with the "center of rotation" being in the middle of the rope... then all of a sudden one of you stops and the rotational momentum transfers to the the person on the outside causing them to accelerate.

which then ( following lines of pressure in the atmosphere) transfers that energy inwards towards the lower pressure. anyway...
1 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
TropicalAnalystwx13
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2109
Age: 27
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2011 8:20 pm
Location: Wilmington, NC
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#653 Postby TropicalAnalystwx13 » Wed Sep 28, 2016 12:28 am

Alyono wrote:looks like there may be 20 kts of shear over this, mainly due to very fast low level easterlies.

This was not supposed to happen

According to whom? There's a reason models only slowly developed this storm through the Windward Islands. This was completely expected.
1 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#654 Postby Aric Dunn » Wed Sep 28, 2016 12:38 am

the biggest thing in this scenario is convection.. that is a very well pronounced low to MLC. convection is the only thing that will bring that energy to the surface.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
TropicalAnalystwx13
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2109
Age: 27
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2011 8:20 pm
Location: Wilmington, NC
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#655 Postby TropicalAnalystwx13 » Wed Sep 28, 2016 12:46 am

97L's convection has continued to become better organized and consolidated today. A microwave pass around 21z showed nice structure. I'd wager the only reason we don't currently have Matthew is because of the lack of an aircraft in the system.
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#656 Postby Alyono » Wed Sep 28, 2016 12:47 am

right now, the structure reminds me of Fay pre genesis.

We either need the convection to collapse and let the low level feature take over, or for the low level feature to dissipate, and let a new low level feature form near the MLC. I lean toward the latter in this scenario
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#657 Postby Aric Dunn » Wed Sep 28, 2016 12:52 am

Alyono wrote:right now, the structure reminds me of Fay pre genesis.

We either need the convection to collapse and let the low level feature take over, or for the low level feature to dissipate, and let a new low level feature form near the MLC. I lean toward the latter in this scenario


This is a classic convective born system we are not likely going to see convection collapse enough to see that transfer. wherever convection can concentrate enough is where we will see a LLC take shape. this recent convection has potential ...
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
Fego
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 767
Age: 65
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2004 7:58 pm
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#658 Postby Fego » Wed Sep 28, 2016 12:53 am

Per NHC.

Image
0 likes   
Go Giants! Go Niners! Go Warriors!

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5849
Age: 41
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#659 Postby Hammy » Wed Sep 28, 2016 1:01 am

Wave axis is showing up on Barbados radar, around 58W, well west of the convection, and there is absolutely no evidence of a closed circulation. This may not form for another 2-3 days, which is about what the Euro showed earlier today.
0 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

SeGaBob

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#660 Postby SeGaBob » Wed Sep 28, 2016 1:07 am

Hammy wrote:Wave axis is showing up on Barbados radar, around 58W, well west of the convection, and there is absolutely no evidence of a closed circulation. This may not form for another 2-3 days, which is about what the Euro showed earlier today.

I think It won't be THAT long.
0 likes   


Return to “2016”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests