fact789 wrote:isn't it time to change the title of the thread?
i guess...
Moderator: S2k Moderators
fact789 wrote:isn't it time to change the title of the thread?
fact789 wrote:isn't it time to change the title of the thread?
Hurricane Hunter 914 wrote:I'm really mad at the JMA. They make this system look weaker than it is. They are misleading Hong Kong in thinking this system won't be so strong. I mean you have to admit this system has stronger winds that 100 mph.
fact789 wrote:jtwc says 150 mph
Team Ragnarok wrote:The JMA seriously needs to rethink the way it estimates intensities, or hand over its duties to, say, the JTWC (like that'll ever happen). If you ignore the JTWC advisory, this would be the best-looking Cat 2 I've ever seen.
senorpepr wrote:Team Ragnarok wrote:The JMA seriously needs to rethink the way it estimates intensities, or hand over its duties to, say, the JTWC (like that'll ever happen). If you ignore the JTWC advisory, this would be the best-looking Cat 2 I've ever seen.
I don't know... I'd rather have my advisories coming from a degreed meteorologist who is specialized in tropics, like someone from the JMA, than someone with a limited meteorology and tropics background like JTWC forecasters.
stormtruth wrote:senorpepr wrote:Team Ragnarok wrote:The JMA seriously needs to rethink the way it estimates intensities, or hand over its duties to, say, the JTWC (like that'll ever happen). If you ignore the JTWC advisory, this would be the best-looking Cat 2 I've ever seen.
I don't know... I'd rather have my advisories coming from a degreed meteorologist who is specialized in tropics, like someone from the JMA, than someone with a limited meteorology and tropics background like JTWC forecasters.
You know it is stronger than what the JMA is saying tho.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests