fasterdisaster wrote:What are the Dvorak numbers for Ike? If they're still based off old presentation when can we expect new ones?
09/2345 UTC 23.1N 84.0W T4.5/4.5 IKE -- Atlantic Ocean
Moderator: S2k Moderators

fasterdisaster wrote:What are the Dvorak numbers for Ike? If they're still based off old presentation when can we expect new ones?
jasons wrote:People - I feel AFM's frustration in the models thread.
Please READ a few pages before posting. Use your noggin. There are "veteran" members making posts that make no sense.
A temporary northern jog is expected. That weakness will eventually close. There is nothing to suggest Ike will move into the NC Gulf Coast. Give it a rest. Please.
This storm has 3 days and 3 warm eddies to go before landfall. The core is very well-organized. The setup is there for intensification. If that doesn't concern you then you need to read more and post less.

Texas Snowman wrote:Guilt by association?
Not sure if I know what you're inferring there.
Maybe it's just me, but the S2K board seems a little snippy tonight and I think it might be good for all of us to take a deep breath, chill out, and let Ike figure out what he's going to do.


Tampa Bay Hurricane wrote:Ike is slow as a snail...not moving much.


The other type of eye is dreaded by most forecasters is the pinhole eye. Much like normal hurricanes these storms do under-go eyewall replacement cycles, but for some unknown reason, when the eye re-emerges its a small and compact eye rather then the large eye that's normal. Quite why this is the case is unknown, though I do have a theory.
It goes that once a hurricane starts to under-go EWRC it's environmental condtions/Heat content rapidly improve. This means that while the eye is forming it contracts like a normal eye would in such condtions. When it emerges its already smaller then a normal eye would be. Then depending on its gradiant it can continue to shrink its eye until its so tiny that the eyewall is forced to collaspe into the eye and it re-begins a EWRC.
A classic example of a pinhole eye was hurricane Wilma, which had one of the smallest ever. Due to the samll size of the eye it takes very little change in atmopsheric condtions for the system to deepen rapidly. Wilma was rather an anomaly and I consider it as a ultra-pinhole hurricane. As with normal pinhole eye hurricanes, it travelled over a region which had a greatly increased heat content compared to its origin. Yet the hurricane had yet to form a eye. So it started life already having a eye as small as most pinhole storms. It then did what most pinhole eyes do, tighten its gradiant. the fact that it already had such a small eye and tight gradiant was, I believe, the reason why it got stronger so fast and was the main facotr in allowing it to get so strong. Here's a image of pinhole eye Wilma at her ultimate, pressure in that 2 mile wide eye was probably below 880mbs.
WILMA HAS DEVELOPED THE DREADED PINHOLE EYE. REPORTS FROM THE AIR FORCE RESERVE HURRICANE HUNTER INVESTIGATING WILMA BETWEEN 19Z AND 23Z INDICATED A 7-8 N MI WIDE EYE...WITH THE CENTRAL PRESSURE DROPPING FROM 970 MB TO 954 MB IN 3 HR 14 MIN.





Extremeweatherguy wrote:If the 11pm track is correct, then this will be a very bad storm from the Texas coast all the way up through Dallas and even into Oklahoma and beyond! We could be looking at a big wind event for cities such as Houston and Victoria, followed by an extreme rainfall and possible tornado threat for Austin, Dallas and Oklahoma City. Nasty! Nasty! Nasty!
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/storm_graphics/ ... 15W_sm.gif
This could very well be one of the worst tropical systems to affect all of the above mentioned areas in many, many years..
That doesn't explain why this storm has a history of such a small eye at such a low rotational velocity. You have seen a similar sat image such as this? Such a small eye with a low angular speed to me implies that atmospheric density or another parameter has changed.

That's exactly what will make it interesting to watch - what will happen with a storm having a similar structure, though lower strength, in an environment with less shear?fasterdisaster wrote:Gustav had shear. Ike doesn't have that, at least for 2 and a half more days (even then it MIGHT not have too much)

done, but this isn't the only page that's crawling for me - I think with Ike's potential, s2k is experiencing a pretty heavy loadEd Mahmoud wrote:Can we edit out the Mimic animations in the response? This page is crawling for me.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests