ATL: IRMA - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
meriland29
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 770
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2017 11:05 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7061 Postby meriland29 » Tue Sep 05, 2017 12:00 pm

will there be a 2pm update and discussion per nhc?
0 likes   

User avatar
SFLcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10162
Age: 47
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Lake Worth Florida

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7062 Postby SFLcane » Tue Sep 05, 2017 12:01 pm

meriland29 wrote:will there be a 2pm update and discussion per nhc?


Yep! Winds likely increased to 185 or so
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 19990
Age: 61
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7063 Postby tolakram » Tue Sep 05, 2017 12:03 pm

Since I was doubting Irma intensity estimates earlier it must be said that just about every reliable model has this storm very intense all the way to Florida. Obviously why the NHC predicts cat 5 almost all the way in. Not GFS intense, but honestly it just doesn't matter when we are talking cat 5.
9 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 19990
Age: 61
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7064 Postby tolakram » Tue Sep 05, 2017 12:04 pm

Image
0 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
meriland29
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 770
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2017 11:05 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7065 Postby meriland29 » Tue Sep 05, 2017 12:04 pm

SFLcane wrote:
meriland29 wrote:will there be a 2pm update and discussion per nhc?


Yep! Winds likely increased to 185 or so



I see the max wind as per last Recon was around 169mph (and other factors of course). Does anyone know what the max wind was in the Recon pass prior to the last one?
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9591
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7066 Postby Steve » Tue Sep 05, 2017 12:05 pm

txwatcher91 wrote:
Steve wrote:
txwatcher91 wrote:
CMC is a terrible model for forecasting TC track. If the Euro comes in similar to GFS and UK then I wouldn’t put much stock into it at all. Plus, it did shift east from its prior run.


I've been running it for 20+ years. It was #2 for a while with IRMA behind HWRF. It's a model. It's the model thread. NHC often uses it and defers to it. It often sucks too and completely botches a solution. However, it's not been all that terrible since the upgrade last year. Also, it's the model thread and it is currently running. Its track is closer to the NHC's track than the current GFS. I'm not suggesting anyone rely on the CMC for life and death decisions. I'm reporting what it shows on the run.


I certainly understand, I’ve been running it 20 years myself. Yes it is useful for observing trends and worth mentioning for that reason alone, but it has performed horribly this year and many new people who read this and see that it hits the FL panhandle may not understand that.


I hear you. I don't claim to be the NHC or a guru or anything so I'll put this out there:

For those of you who are new, I'll tell you if/when I have a specific call or disagreement with a model, the NHC, pro-mets or whatever. As for the models, CMC is one of the main models the NHC uses to make and adjust forecasts. For my money, by itself, it can be particularly useful to sniff out patterns of high/low pressure in the CONUS and in Canada. It's got a pretty good handle usually on upper flow. We here always referred to it as the Crazy Uncle Canadian because at times it used to spin up 4, 5, 6 lows in the basin - basically any spin had the potential to be a storm on the CMC. They tweaked it a bit last year, and the forecasts and reliability are better. But it's not nearly as good as the GFS or ECMWF (both suspect themselves) and is more in the NAVGEM realm - models you want to throw out but still need to consider how they are handling the pattern and interactions with airmasses.
7 likes   

txwatcher91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1498
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:29 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7067 Postby txwatcher91 » Tue Sep 05, 2017 12:07 pm

tolakram wrote:Since I was doubting Irma intensity estimates earlier it must be said that just about every reliable model has this storm very intense all the way to Florida. Obviously why the NHC predicts cat 5 almost all the way in. Not GFS intense, but honestly it just doesn't matter when we are talking cat 5.


The strengthening shown in the Bahamas is concerning. The models are probably too extreme on the pressure (GFS and HMON) but the upper level conditions seem about as perfect as one could imagine. If it taps into the huge outflow channel into the trough to the north... it could be really bad. The high heat content, moist environment, and exceptional upper level conditions are probably why all the models bomb this like they do. I’ve never seen the UK forecast a sub 920mb storm before...
0 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10140
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7068 Postby Blown Away » Tue Sep 05, 2017 12:08 pm

Only 9 more Euro runs before reaching Florida ATM...
0 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05... EYE COMING MY WAY IN 2024…
Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…

dukeblue219
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 535
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2016 3:52 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7069 Postby dukeblue219 » Tue Sep 05, 2017 12:09 pm

meriland29 wrote:
SFLcane wrote:
meriland29 wrote:will there be a 2pm update and discussion per nhc?


Yep! Winds likely increased to 185 or so



I see the max wind as per last Recon was around 169mph (and other factors of course). Does anyone know what the max wind was in the Recon pass prior to the last one?


The last recon pass (maybe 20 minutes ago?) had a SFMR reading of about 184mph. The vortex message from 17:05 UTC contains this too:

D. Estimated (by SFMR or visually) Maximum Surface Wind Inbound: 160kts (~ 184.1mph)
Last edited by dukeblue219 on Tue Sep 05, 2017 12:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 19990
Age: 61
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7070 Postby tolakram » Tue Sep 05, 2017 12:09 pm

txwatcher91 wrote:
tolakram wrote:Since I was doubting Irma intensity estimates earlier it must be said that just about every reliable model has this storm very intense all the way to Florida. Obviously why the NHC predicts cat 5 almost all the way in. Not GFS intense, but honestly it just doesn't matter when we are talking cat 5.


The strengthening shown in the Bahamas is concerning. The models are probably too extreme on the pressure (GFS and HMON) but the upper level conditions seem about as perfect as one could imagine. If it taps into the huge outflow channel into the trough to the north... it could be really bad. The high heat content, moist environment, and exceptional upper level conditions are probably why all the models bomb this like they do. I’ve never seen the UK forecast a sub 920mb storm before...


Yea, having the UKie go that low after land interaction is a little alarming.
0 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

jdjaguar
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 551
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 12:07 pm
Location: Jacksonville Beach, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7071 Postby jdjaguar » Tue Sep 05, 2017 12:10 pm

Blown Away wrote:Only 9 more Euro runs before reaching Florida ATM...

when is the next run?
0 likes   

Ken711
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1074
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 12:48 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7072 Postby Ken711 » Tue Sep 05, 2017 12:10 pm

Steve wrote:
txwatcher91 wrote:
Steve wrote:
I've been running it for 20+ years. It was #2 for a while with IRMA behind HWRF. It's a model. It's the model thread. NHC often uses it and defers to it. It often sucks too and completely botches a solution. However, it's not been all that terrible since the upgrade last year. Also, it's the model thread and it is currently running. Its track is closer to the NHC's track than the current GFS. I'm not suggesting anyone rely on the CMC for life and death decisions. I'm reporting what it shows on the run.


I certainly understand, I’ve been running it 20 years myself. Yes it is useful for observing trends and worth mentioning for that reason alone, but it has performed horribly this year and many new people who read this and see that it hits the FL panhandle may not understand that.


I hear you. I don't claim to be the NHC or a guru or anything so I'll put this out there:

For those of you who are new, I'll tell you if/when I have a specific call or disagreement with a model, the NHC, pro-mets or whatever. As for the models, CMC is one of the main models the NHC uses to make and adjust forecasts. For my money, by itself, it can be particularly useful to sniff out patterns of high/low pressure in the CONUS and in Canada. It's got a pretty good handle usually on upper flow. We here always referred to it as the Crazy Uncle Canadian because at times it used to spin up 4, 5, 6 lows in the basin - basically any spin had the potential to be a storm on the CMC. They tweaked it a bit last year, and the forecasts and reliability are better. But it's not nearly as good as the GFS or ECMWF (both suspect themselves) and is more in the NAVGEM realm - models you want to throw out but still need to consider how they are handling the pattern and interactions with airmasses.


Both the CMC and UKMET interestingly are the two models that take a track through most of Cuba, unlike the GFS and Euro that skirt to the north of it.
2 likes   

User avatar
meriland29
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 770
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2017 11:05 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7073 Postby meriland29 » Tue Sep 05, 2017 12:11 pm

dukeblue219 wrote:
meriland29 wrote:
SFLcane wrote:
Yep! Winds likely increased to 185 or so



I see the max wind as per last Recon was around 169mph (and other factors of course). Does anyone know what the max wind was in the Recon pass prior to the last one?


The last recon pass (maybe 20 minutes ago?) had a SFMR reading of about 184mph. The vortex message from 17:05 UTC contains this too:

D. Estimated (by SFMR or visually) Maximum Surface Wind Inbound: 160kts (~ 184.1mph)



Oh, I stand corrected, I apologize. I apparently can't keep up fast enough. Thank you for informing me.
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 19990
Age: 61
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7074 Postby tolakram » Tue Sep 05, 2017 12:12 pm

jdjaguar wrote:
Blown Away wrote:Only 9 more Euro runs before reaching Florida ATM...

when is the next run?


1:45 EDT am/pm
0 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

M3gaMatch
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 38
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2016 2:32 pm
Location: Queensland, Australia

Re: RE: Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7075 Postby M3gaMatch » Tue Sep 05, 2017 12:12 pm

tolakram wrote:UK Plot

Image

16.7, -57.7
17.2, -60.2
17.9, -63.0
18.9, -65.4
19.8, -68.0
20.6, -70.7
20.9, -73.1
20.9, -75.2
21.0, -77.2
21.2, -78.7
22.2, -79.7
23.5, -79.6
25.5, -79.5

Map tool: https://www.darrinward.com/lat-long/?id=59aed24b454f67.43185594
Thanks tola, still right into Cuba :(
Last edited by M3gaMatch on Tue Sep 05, 2017 12:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23689
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7076 Postby gatorcane » Tue Sep 05, 2017 12:13 pm

12Z NAVGEM shifts EAST, now east of SE Florida:

Image
1 likes   

jdjaguar
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 551
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 12:07 pm
Location: Jacksonville Beach, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7077 Postby jdjaguar » Tue Sep 05, 2017 12:13 pm

tolakram wrote:
jdjaguar wrote:
Blown Away wrote:Only 9 more Euro runs before reaching Florida ATM...

when is the next run?


1:45 EDT am/pm

thank you.

are they every 6 hours?

or 12?
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 19990
Age: 61
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7078 Postby tolakram » Tue Sep 05, 2017 12:13 pm

Image
0 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9591
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7079 Postby Steve » Tue Sep 05, 2017 12:13 pm

at 66 hours, HWRF is passing between Mayaguana to the North and Inagua to the South and appears to be headed for the Bahamas at that point as Strong Cat 5. Been my #1 worry for the last week that some of the Bahamas would get wrecked. HWRF seems to agree with the scenario.
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 0512&fh=66
2 likes   

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4811
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#7080 Postby ronjon » Tue Sep 05, 2017 12:13 pm

12z HWRF a little SW of 06z run at 60 hrs.
0 likes   


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests