ATL: ETA - Models
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Re: ATL: ETA - Models
I'm a bit hesitant to lean on any particular run or solution until we see how Eta holds up and where it comes back out over water. Seems to be a good bet that models want to initially take it N or NE but hard to deduce anything else.
1 likes
Andrew (1992), Irene (1999), Frances (2004), Katrina (2005), Wilma (2005), Fay (2008), Irma (2017), Eta (2020), Ian (2022)
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 4966
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:43 am
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 4966
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:43 am
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 4030
- Age: 29
- Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
- Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida
Re: ATL: ETA - Models
Run of the year.
Throw it out.
3 likes
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.
Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)
TCVN is a weighted averaged
Re: ATL: ETA - Models
GFS pushes Eta back to the Caribbean and I’m afraid it will ramp up again and threaten us with a more potent storm.
0 likes
-
- Category 4
- Posts: 998
- Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2018 5:29 pm
- Location: Madison, WI
Re: ATL: ETA - Models
supercane4867 wrote:In case anyone has not checked 00z GFS-para...
https://i.imgur.com/OsXcDJl.gif
"The Ultimate Fujiwhara"
Remember when Laura and Marco were supposed to be "Double Trouble?"

1 likes
- Spacecoast
- Category 2
- Posts: 758
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2017 2:03 pm
Re: ATL: ETA - Models
chris_fit wrote:Looks like it's going to go the other way now (West or NW) @ 160 hours.
Seems to be following the 6z AEMI track....
The ensembles are widely dispersed, which seems to accurately reflect the uncertainty (post-CA) of any specific tracks after 72 hrs.
All deterministic runs, or individual ensemble member tracks will be low confidence. The OFCL, and Ensemble mean tracks will be the closest thing to accurate we will have for the next couple of days, IMHO.
0 likes
-
- Category 1
- Posts: 299
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2018 1:38 pm
Re: RE: Re: ATL: ETA - Models
I actually audibly laughed watching this. Twins!

1 likes
Not an meteorologist! Just someone who is interested in weather. Please refer to the NHC and local weather officials to make decisions.
-Jack
-Jack

-
- Category 5
- Posts: 4966
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:43 am
Re: ATL: ETA - Models
We can throw out pretty much every model solution at this point. Let’s just see how things evolve once it emerges in the Gulf of Honduras later this week. May not even leave the NW Caribbean, but who knows. The ensembles haven’t been much better either.
0 likes
Re: ATL: ETA - Models

0 likes
Re: ATL: ETA - Models
12z GFS into Apalachicola at 288 hrs - 988 mb.
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/?model=gfs®ion=seus&pkg=mslp_pcpn&runtime=2020110212&fh=288
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/?model=gfs®ion=seus&pkg=mslp_pcpn&runtime=2020110212&fh=288
0 likes
Re: ATL: ETA - Models
12z CMC and GFS pretty similar with 1001-02 ish low pressure in the Yuc straits at hour 198.
0 likes
Re: RE: Re: ATL: ETA - Models
shiny-pebble wrote:I actually audibly laughed watching this. Twins!
I did too, and my spouse wanted to know what I found funny. Problem is he hasn't studied this stuff and he thinks I'm making fun of his lack of understanding

0 likes
Re: ATL: ETA - Models
12z GFS and CMC are pretty identical. Weak/broad low in the NW Caribbean that tries to shoot NE but gets shunted west around Florida before heading towards the north Gulf Coast.
0 likes
- Spacecoast
- Category 2
- Posts: 758
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2017 2:03 pm
Re: ATL: ETA - Models
TheStormExpert wrote:We can throw out pretty much every model solution at this point. Let’s just see how things evolve once it emerges in the Gulf of Honduras later this week. May not even leave the NW Caribbean, but who knows. The ensembles haven’t been much better either.
I disagree.
Ensembles are specifically designed to provide a wide range of possible solutions, by perturbing the intial observed conditions/ and physics.
Sometimes the ensemble members are tightly clustered around one, or two solutions, which means there is high certainty of those one, or two tracks.
Sometimes the ensemble members are widely dispersed, which is essentially saying anything is possible, and any track forecast will be low confidence, or high statistical spread.
Deterministic runs do not provide this measure of certainty / confidence.
I would be highly suspicious of any tightly clustered ensemble, (or deterministic) runs of Eta after:
1. CA landfall,
2. interacting with mountainous terrian,
3. exiting CA,
4. reforming,
5. potentially interracting with land over cuba,
6. interacting with cold front(s)
That is why the ensembles are screaming "we have no clue what will happen after 96 hrs", which is at this point,is a very accurate statement of the situation.
They will eventually start clustering together, and give us a clearer picture of what will happen (probably after exiting CA).
6 likes
- SouthFLTropics
- Category 5
- Posts: 4236
- Age: 50
- Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 8:04 am
- Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida
Re: ATL: ETA - Models
That GFS-Para run reminds me of a ride at the local county fair...WHEEEEEEEEE!!! I normally don't rule out any model run but this one can go in the waste basket.
0 likes
Fourth Generation Florida Native
Personal Storm History: David 79, Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22, Milton 24
Personal Storm History: David 79, Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22, Milton 24
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests