ATL : INVEST 92L - DISCUSSION

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Thunder44
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5922
Age: 44
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 7:53 pm
Location: New York City

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L - Discussion

#761 Postby Thunder44 » Wed Jun 16, 2010 9:57 am

NHC's definition is for closed surface circulation for an upgrade. And I still don't see any evidence of closed surface or LLC, on the visible loop. But I think there is a MLC near 14N 50W.
0 likes   

bob rulz
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1704
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 7:30 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

#762 Postby bob rulz » Wed Jun 16, 2010 9:57 am

Whether or not it is or was a TD, it could still be upgraded in the postseason analysis.

I don't think whether it was declared or not is really that important except to give us something to talk about because it's clearly headed to its doom long before it reaches the Lesser Antilles. Even if it were a TD or even a TS then it was only for a very short amount of time.
0 likes   

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5300
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

#763 Postby Nimbus » Wed Jun 16, 2010 10:05 am

Looks like another convective burst might be starting, they seem to be coming a little closer together now. Probably due to the warmer SST's.
0 likes   

clfenwi
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3331
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 12:54 pm

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L - Discussion

#764 Postby clfenwi » Wed Jun 16, 2010 10:08 am

Something to keep in mind regards "call/no call" is that at no point has either SSD or TPC rated the system above 1.5 in Dvorak classification. Only when there's been overwhelming evidence of a tropical depression/storm have they upgraded a system that's not a sustainable 2.0 +.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L - Discussion

#765 Postby HURAKAN » Wed Jun 16, 2010 10:15 am

Image

Latest
0 likes   

User avatar
bvigal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2276
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 8:49 am
Location: British Virgin Islands
Contact:

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L - Discussion

#766 Postby bvigal » Wed Jun 16, 2010 10:20 am

Cryomaniac wrote:Calls shouldn't be made (or not) for PR purposes though, they should be made on meteorological grounds only.

Absolutely correct, Cryomaniac! Hey, no doubt feds do some wierd stuff and it's all about how the 'spin' will help certain people or about payback of promises to others. The whole oil spill topic just breaks my heart. But, I don't see a reason to 'smell smoke' in the case of not classifying 92L. Have seen many of these kind of discussions occur in past years, when folks thought the NHC was refusing to call the'obvious'. Heck, I've been one of them, at certain times, lol!

(Hasn't been much love lost between NHC & 'the Penn Senators and their 'weather service' since RS proposed a bill to dissolve NWS a few years back - ok, not dissolve, but put data dissemination into private hands so we can pay for it! hey Rick, hey Arlen, enjoy your retirement from politics, :roflmao: !)
0 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10145
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L - Discussion

#767 Postby Blown Away » Wed Jun 16, 2010 10:26 am

bvigal wrote:
Cryomaniac wrote:Calls shouldn't be made (or not) for PR purposes though, they should be made on meteorological grounds only.

Absolutely correct, Cryomaniac! Hey, no doubt feds do some wierd stuff and it's all about how the 'spin' will help certain people or about payback of promises to others. The whole oil spill topic just breaks my heart. But, I don't see a reason to 'smell smoke' in the case of not classifying 92L. Have seen many of these kind of discussions occur in past years, when folks thought the NHC was refusing to call the'obvious'. Heck, I've been one of them, at certain times, lol!

(Hasn't been much love lost between NHC & 'the Penn Senators and their 'weather service' since RS proposed a bill to dissolve NWS a few years back. hey Rick, hey Arlen, enjoy your retirement from politics, :roflmao: !)


Really, you don't think politics can influence a government program like the NHC? Yeah maybe 92L was temporarily a TD, the can upgrade it postseason if warranted.
0 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05... EYE COMING MY WAY IN 2024…
Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15446
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L - Discussion

#768 Postby NDG » Wed Jun 16, 2010 10:45 am

Thunder44 wrote:NHC's definition is for closed surface circulation for an upgrade. And I still don't see any evidence of closed surface or LLC, on the visible loop. But I think there is a MLC near 14N 50W.


Here's where I see the now exposed LLC, it has left the mid level circulation behind now that it finally is encountering the stronger shear especially in the mid levels.

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11161
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L - Discussion

#769 Postby Ivanhater » Wed Jun 16, 2010 10:47 am

If it continues to head westerly and take this path, it will be able to avoid most of the shear

Image

96 hours

Image
0 likes   
Michael

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11161
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L - Discussion

#770 Postby Ivanhater » Wed Jun 16, 2010 10:49 am

New 12z GFS 54 HOURS

Image
0 likes   
Michael

User avatar
hockeytim19
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 15
Age: 44
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 7:36 pm
Location: Deerfield Beach, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L - Discussion

#771 Postby hockeytim19 » Wed Jun 16, 2010 10:49 am

I agree with some of the posts I've seen... and maybe this is better suited for a general discussion. Whether 92L was/is a tropical depression, it begs the question: when should the NHC classify a system as a tropical depression? In recent years, I can remember many times when the NHC would drag its feet time and time again in upgrading to a depression, or from a depression to a named storm.

If it's purely beacuse there is not enough sound meteorological evidence behind an upgrade, then fine. But if there's more going on in a government organization... after the 2005 season we had... after the oil spill in the gulf this year... then that's a completely different story. Unfortunately I think the bottom line is we have an instance of actual scientists working in a governmental organization trying to walk a fine line between science and PR... knowing full well that the media is salivating at the opportunity to jump all over a newly formed tropical system, whether its a lowly tropical depression being sheared apart... or a cat 5 hurricane bearing down on NOLA/Miami, etc.

While I do agree with JB to a point... it's a heck of a lot easier for AccuWeather to make a call on a system then it is for the NHC.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145313
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L - Discussion

#772 Postby cycloneye » Wed Jun 16, 2010 11:02 am

For the members that live in the Caribbean and still dont know,we have a thread for the Local Caribbean & Central-America Weather at U.S. & Caribbean Weather forum where you can post what is going on weatherwise in the islands,and it will be important for the next few days to know the observations from the different islands as 92L moves thru.Also,there are many web cams posted on the first post of the thread.

viewtopic.php?f=24&t=85676&p=1991635#p1991635
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
Bocadude85
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2991
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
Location: Honolulu,Hi

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L - Discussion

#773 Postby Bocadude85 » Wed Jun 16, 2010 11:21 am

Ivanhater wrote:If it continues to head westerly and take this path, it will be able to avoid most of the shear

Image

96 hours

Image



I am not sure how much of 92L will be left if it passes over the greater antilles
0 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10145
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L - Discussion

#774 Postby Blown Away » Wed Jun 16, 2010 11:31 am

Image
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/loop-vis.html

IMO, the LLC looks intact but is in the process of losing the convection to the SE. I expect the LLC to be totally exposed in a few hours. The LLC seems to be moving a pretty good clip and maybe this will help keep the LLC intact when it encounters better conditions???
0 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05... EYE COMING MY WAY IN 2024…
Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…

User avatar
TexasF6
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 816
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 9:33 pm
Location: Austin, TX

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L - Discussion

#775 Postby TexasF6 » Wed Jun 16, 2010 12:09 pm

Not so fast my friend--the center may be undergoing a reformation to the SE under that burst which seems to have decent rotation. TC's often do this to protect themselves vs. shear.......
0 likes   

User avatar
tailgater
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3339
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 9:13 pm
Location: St. Amant La.

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L - Discussion

#776 Postby tailgater » Wed Jun 16, 2010 12:27 pm

Check out this five day loop out and draw your own conclusions, especially the last few frames in the eastern Caribbean.
http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic2/real ... 1java.html
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38090
Age: 36
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L - Discussion

#777 Postby Brent » Wed Jun 16, 2010 12:33 pm

NHC still says NEXT!

SHOWERS AND THUNDERSTORMS ASSOCIATED WITH THE LOW PRESSURE SYSTEM
LOCATED ABOUT 625 MILES EAST OF THE LESSER ANTILLES ARE POORLY
ORGANIZED. UPPER-LEVEL WINDS ARE EXPECTED TO REMAIN UNFAVORABLE
FOR TROPICAL CYCLONE FORMATION. THERE IS A LOW CHANCE...10
PERCENT... OF THIS SYSTEM BECOMING A TROPICAL CYCLONE DURING THE
NEXT 48 HOURS AS IT MOVES WEST-NORTHWESTWARD NEAR 15 MPH.
0 likes   
#neversummer

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#778 Postby KWT » Wed Jun 16, 2010 12:41 pm

Well this mornings convective burst was pretty interesting but as it has done nearly every day over the last few the convection is really weakening.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20009
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L - Discussion

#779 Postby tolakram » Wed Jun 16, 2010 12:57 pm

It hit the wall and now the LLC is fully exposed.

Image
0 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#780 Postby KWT » Wed Jun 16, 2010 1:00 pm

Whilst I think most of us have said this at some point, I think this really could be it for 92L this time round, the shear is finally hitting the system, its done well to avoid it as long as it did.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests